Re: [arch-general] Why does virtualbox-host-dkms have a hard dependency on linux-headers?

2016-03-13 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On dim., 2016-03-13 at 19:32 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > PS: > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 11:01:30 -0700, Kyle Terrien wrote: > > > > Why > I guess the maintainer tries to make it as comfortable for us as > possible. Yes that was my goal, until we find a way to dep on at least one kernel and its hea

Re: [arch-general] Missing Dependency virtualbox-host-dkms

2016-03-06 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On dim., 2016-03-06 at 18:16 +0100, Chr1s via arch-general wrote: > On 03/06/2016 05:16 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > > > > It would be rather unfair towards users of a different kernel to make a > > hard dependency on the main kernel. > You're right, that could be unfair esp when you install kernels

[arch-general] Call for the Archlinux France Meetup #2

2015-10-07 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
Hello, In order to prepare the second edition of the french Archlinux meetup, we are looking for talkers[1]. Lightning or longer talks are welcome. This edition should happen this November in Paris. If you are interested, please submit a subject by sending me a mail. Cheers, [1] We are also loo

Re: [arch-general] gpg source validation for kernel.org style signatures

2015-01-05 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 05/01/2015 10:09, Daniel Micay wrote: > On 04/01/15 04:05 PM, Christian Hesse wrote: > I would create a wiki page with the list and then see if you can find a > developer interested in mass-adding the missing signatures. I'd be > interested in helping with it for [community], but you'll likely b

Re: [arch-general] Meetup in Paris

2014-10-20 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 02/10/2014 19:06, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > On 29/08/2014 01:27, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >> Ehlo, >> >> I'm pleased to announce you that a meetup[1] event is in preparation in >> Paris. That is targeting French speakers with 2 talks[2] about our >>

Re: [arch-general] systemd timers: switch default target to timers.target?

2014-10-07 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 06/10/2014 23:45, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 04.10.2014 um 13:44 schrieb Neitsab: > Why? > > Most of these timers should only be available when running a fully > booted system. timers.target is pulled in by basic.target. This implies > that startup of all normal services is delayed until the st

Re: [arch-general] systemd timers: switch default target to timers.target?

2014-10-06 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 05/10/2014 20:21, Rodrigo Rivas wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Neitsab wrote: > $ pkgfile --glob *.timer | xargs -n1 pkgfile --list | grep .timer$ > /usr/lib/systemd/system/mailman-checkdbs.timer > /usr/lib/systemd/system/mailman-cullbadshunt.timer > /usr/lib/systemd/system/mailman-di

Re: [arch-general] Meetup in Paris

2014-10-02 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 29/08/2014 01:27, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > Ehlo, > > I'm pleased to announce you that a meetup[1] event is in preparation in > Paris. That is targeting French speakers with 2 talks[2] about our > favourite distribution. This will be followed by some drinks and foods.

[arch-general] Meetup in Paris

2014-08-28 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
Ehlo, I'm pleased to announce you that a meetup[1] event is in preparation in Paris. That is targeting French speakers with 2 talks[2] about our favourite distribution. This will be followed by some drinks and foods. There is no selected location, person interested by meetup events are invited to

Re: [arch-general] lz4 need add man doc

2013-12-04 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 04/12/2013 06:53, Yi Zheng wrote: > Hi Luttringer, > >I checked the source pkg of lz4, and found that there is a man page > file named "lz4.1" available. But your PKGBUILD script do not install > it into the pkg. > > Do you think it is necessary add that doc? > Hi Zheng, Please use ou

Re: [arch-general] arch rollback machine

2013-12-03 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 03/12/2013 10:36, archli...@jelmail.com wrote: > On 03/12/13 02:09, Gaetan Bisson wrote: >> [2013-12-02 23:55:29 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer: >>> Ok, you want a fake db files with all versions of the same package. >> No, he just wants a directory with every version of e

Re: [arch-general] arch rollback machine

2013-12-02 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 02/12/2013 12:14, Don deJuan wrote: > On 12/02/2013 02:52 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >> On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote: >>>> I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all versions >>>> of the same package in the AR

Re: [arch-general] arch rollback machine

2013-12-02 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 02/12/2013 21:05, archli...@jelmail.com wrote: > On 02/12/13 14:51, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >> On 02/12/2013 15:38, archli...@jelmail.com wrote: >>> On 02/12/13 10:52, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >>>> On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote: >&g

Re: [arch-general] arch rollback machine

2013-12-02 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 02/12/2013 15:38, archli...@jelmail.com wrote: > On 02/12/13 10:52, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >> On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote: >>>> I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all >>>> versions >>>> of the same

Re: [arch-general] arch rollback machine

2013-12-02 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote: > >> I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all versions >> of the same package in the ARM. >> Documentation[1] has been updated. >> > Hello Sébastien, > > It's great that we have ARM again - thank you for your good work to >

Re: [arch-general] arch rollback machine

2013-11-20 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 05/09/2013 02:44, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Lieven Moors wrote: > I setup an ARM-like on one server. You can access it at: > http://seblu.net/a/arm/. > > # tree -L 3 > ├── 2013 > │ ├── 08 > │ │ └── 31 >

Re: [arch-general] iptables script

2013-09-11 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:20 PM, F. Gr. wrote: > Jakub Klinkovský [2013-09-10 20:01:01+0200]: > > [...] >> I don't know how you use the script, but you might consider using >> the 'iptables-restore' command to switch between multiple iptables >> configurations. If you still want to use the iptable

Re: [arch-general] arch rollback machine

2013-09-04 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Lieven Moors wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know what is happening with Arch Rollback Machine? > The server (arm.konnichi.com) has been unavailable for more than a week now, > and I'm depending on it to keep an offline machine up to date... Hello, I setup an ARM-l

Re: [arch-general] OpenNTPd not correcting time on boot

2013-08-07 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Joe Eaves wrote: > On 3 July 2013 08:36, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote: >> >> >> I did not test this, but you may want to make it "want" >> network-online.target instead of network.target. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Maxime > > Hi, > > I tried this but it didn't work. I set bo

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux on servers?

2013-07-10 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:13 PM, M Saunders wrote: > which has some useful tips. But it'd be interesting to hear from > people running Arch on production servers, how well it works for them > and what (if any) problems they've faced. > I've 9 personal servers running Archlinux (previously under d

Re: [arch-general] 'Check out-of-date packages' tool

2013-05-14 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hi everyone > > Per discussion in 'pacman-dev' maillist [1] I implemented a tool that tries > to find Arch out-of-date packages. The tool scans PKGBUILD files is > /var/abs directory, extracts download url and then tries to probe download >

Re: [arch-general] The "new" opensmtpd package

2013-04-18 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > On 2013-04-17 22:04, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera >> wrote: > Yes, but they differ from the defaults for no aparent reason. > For example, since the sys

Re: [arch-general] The "new" opensmtpd package

2013-04-18 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Chris Down wrote: > On 2013-04-17 22:04, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera > I must say I do find it a bit off that a package with a conflicting name would > be added without even attempting to

Re: [arch-general] The "new" opensmtpd package

2013-04-17 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > One of the problems with the new package in [community], is that it's > build configuration differs SO MUCH from the defaults (and my own > package), that their settings are incompatible. I belive this goes > against the Arch way, whic

Re: [arch-general] debug package repositories

2013-04-14 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:14 PM, William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote: > What I would propose (and I've implemented this locally fine) is to have > a separate series of repositories named [$repo-debug] that only contain > the -debug packages, allowing those that don't bother with testing or >

Re: [arch-general] virtualbox-host-modules

2013-04-08 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > It would be nice if virtualbox-host-modules could become an optional > dependency. You should use vbox-host-dkms, it provides vbox-host-modules and allow compiling of modules for custom kernel. Cheers, -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer htt

Re: [arch-general] Can't build virtualbox

2013-03-01 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Manuel Reimer wrote: > Hello, > > I have a reproducible problem with virtualbox on my system. To find out > which version was the first one that causes those problems for me, I want to > build virtualbox on my own and step back until the problem no longer exists.

Re: [arch-general] linux-tools-meta, why?

2013-02-19 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Brock.Zheng wrote: > Hi all > >I found that package in community, >The pkg has no content. The only file in it's pkg is >a .PKGINFO file: > >$> tar -tf > archlinux/community/os/x86_64/linux-tools-meta-3.8-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz >.PKGINFO > >An

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Add Wayland/Weston

2013-02-13 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Armin K. wrote: > On 02/12/2013 05:51 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Andreas Radke >> wrote: >>> >>> Am Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:35:27 +0100 >>> schrieb Andreas Radke : >>> Since cairo will also depend on that libegl then every syst

Re: [arch-general] signature from "Thorsten Tpper " is unknown trust

2013-01-28 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Christian Hesse wrote: > William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> on Sun, 2013/01/27 15:56: >> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 03:19:14PM +0530, Sudaraka Wijesinghe wrote: > Running this from cron from time to time makes sense in my opinion. I've > already added this on my syste

[arch-general] Awesome 3.5

2012-12-23 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
Hello, as a Chritsmas gift, Awesome 3.5 was released yesterdaty and will be available in few minutes in our community-testing repository. As you can expect, this update _will_ break your configuration. Please take time to read the announce[0] from Uli about this release before upgrading. If ever

Re: [arch-general] Prosody update

2012-12-12 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:31 PM, gt wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:11:26AM -0800, David Benfell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> It appears that the prosody package dependencies have been updated, but >> not the program itself: >> >> atlanta# prosodyctl start >> >> ** >> Prosod

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PSA] minor filesystem changes

2012-10-24 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:43:23 +0200 > Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I just pushed a new filesystem package to testing with two minor changes: >> >> We now rely on nss-myhostname being installed, so we no longer have to >> instruct p

Re: [arch-general] Strange pacman problem with conflicting dependencies

2012-09-18 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote: > Hi > > On a machine with a less frequent updating schedule (~once a month) I receive > the following when doing pacman -Suy > > ->8- > # pacman -Suy > :: Synchronizing package databases... > testing is up to

Re: [arch-general] Init script hidden output (careless /dev/null redirection)

2012-09-13 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Jacob Joseph wrote: > Some underlying programs produce no output; I'm not proposing that > Arch address all such cases. Instead, the scenario I continue to run > into is that the init script redirects all output, good or bad, to > /dev/null. In my opinion, this i

Re: [arch-general] cannot set locale (systemd)

2012-08-31 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Tomás Acauan Schertel wrote: > My system was already properly configured, but after last update, > everything is en_US. You can put your local in /etc/environment or in ~/.pam_environment. -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-general] How to align partitions?

2012-08-30 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stayvoid wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to know how to create aligned partitions on a 160GB disk > which uses a 512B sector size. Almost all recent HDD/SSD have 4KiB internal sector (even when reported as 512B by ATA). Read [1]. > (Partition table: msdos) > > I've got

Re: [arch-general] New install media 2012.08.04 uses ZSH, if I may ask, why?

2012-08-05 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Kyle wrote: >> I'm more curious as to why zsh is used in the live/install media but not on >> the base install. I personally like zsh, but it seems better IMHO to use the >> same interactive shell on both the liv

Re: [arch-general] Upcoming changes to virtualbox

2012-07-24 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Christian Hesse wrote: > Sébastien Luttringer on Mon, 2012/07/23 02:01: >> Some changes will be introduced in the next package release of virtualbox. > > This is when virtualbox 4.1.20 is released? Have not seen anything in the > testing repos y

Re: [arch-general] Upcoming changes to virtualbox

2012-07-24 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:28 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 07/23/2012 06:11 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >>> Come to think of this, would dkms then be a hard dep for virtualbox? >> dkms become an hard dep for virtualbox-source (and >> virtualbox-archlinux-so

Re: [arch-general] Upcoming changes to virtualbox

2012-07-23 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Karol Babioch wrote: >>> Am 23.07.2012 02:01, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer: > My current practice is to use my own simple w

Re: [arch-general] Upcoming changes to virtualbox

2012-07-22 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Karol Babioch wrote: > Hi, > > Am 23.07.2012 02:01, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer: >> You will be able to build your virtualbox modules by running >> $ dkms install vboxhost/4.1.18 >> or you can let dkms rc script compile/ins

[arch-general] Upcoming changes to virtualbox

2012-07-22 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
Hello, Some changes will be introduced in the next package release of virtualbox. - vboxbuild will be dropped in favor of upstream provided dkms config. (FS#30692) (FS#30749) (FS#28792) You will be able to build your virtualbox modules by running $ dkms install vboxhost/4.1.18 or you can

Re: [arch-general] My end-user $0.02 on /etc/rc.conf splitting.

2012-07-22 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Nicholas MIller wrote: > I'm also curious how the people who work on initscript believe systemd is > superior. I think it's a consensus! Take a close look, there is no doubt. -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-general] merging files from pacnew

2012-06-24 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Arno Gaboury wrote: > Is there a simple command line I can use, appart sdiff and Vimdiff?? if use pacdiff from pacman-contrib -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-general] Virtualbox USB issues after upgrade

2012-06-13 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running XP SP2 on Vbox, to handle an iPad2 by iTunes via USB cable. > > I already had issues in the past, but after an Arch update today sync, > recovery, any similar operation doesn't work anymore, regarding to USB > issues. > I

Re: [arch-general] virtualbox-bin aur - vboxdrv -> dkms -> confusion...

2012-06-05 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: >  Is there a benefit to the AUR version over the Community version? They > should be feature equivalent now. Most features should be the same as non-free code is in virtualbox-ext-oracle[1]. Using community version is recommended. There is

Re: [arch-general] virtualbox-bin aur - vboxdrv -> dkms -> confusion...

2012-06-05 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:16 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: >  So I read the https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Virtualbox ... This page is for virtualbox official package. You can find informations in the package comment page. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51727 >  Also, since I don't