On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2012-10-14 10:19:10 +0200] Menachem Moystoviz:
>> So in essence, what you're proposing is to only upgrade from VPS to private
>> hosting when the resiliency of my private server is good enough - i.e. not
>> mos
>> > That's debateable, DOS sure, but you have much greater control and speed
>> > of access with a local mail server and past mail will still be
>> > accessible during any attack.
>> I wasn't referring to DOS/DDOS-style reliability. In my mind,
>> reliability ~= uptime > 99.999%
>> Of course, you'
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> My other option is to host my own mail server, either at home or on a
>> VPS (which would cost more),
>> which means much lowered reliability, which means much lowered
>> reliability
>
> Sending to you directly as this mail was rejected by
>From the responses I've received, I gather the following:
- Crypto is only going to get me so far, unless I can coerce all
incoming email to use TLS
- Until I have a steady income, my best bet is to use Google Apps for my domain
and to download all incoming mail - probably deleting it from
Googl
Reading through the responses, I find that my previous evaluation of
my options was correct.
The most reliable and easiest solution, by far, would be to set up a
standard account,
and to download a copy of all emails. The only problems with this are
the lack of control and privacy.
My other option
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:29 PM, phanisvara wrote:
> On Thursday 11 Oct 2012 18:18:10 Menachem Moystoviz wrote:
>> Basically, the suggestion I'm seeing here is: go, work, get a VPS -
>> can probably get one for cheap - and setup Arch on it.
>> Sounds good. Will only hav
Basically, the suggestion I'm seeing here is: go, work, get a VPS -
can probably get one for cheap - and setup Arch on it.
Sounds good. Will only have to figure out how to get money...
Gesh
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote:
> Menachem Moystoviz, Thu 2012-10-11 @ 13:23:32+0200:
>> Which do you suggest? Do you have an alternative?
>
> I use Postfix + Dovecot on an Arch Linux Linode VPS and I'm pretty happy
> with it.
>
>
>> 2)
> I do a combination of #1 and #2.
>
> I have a (cheap!) web hosting account (with Dreamhost) which also provides
> me with an email address on their mail system. I have the DNS entries for
> my domain point to Dreamhost, so any mail for my domain gets delivered
> there.
>
> But I only use Dreamho
Thank you. The questions posed were quite enlightening, and showed me
that this needs a bit more thought.
> I believe first question you need to answer is: what is your threat model?
>
> Are you afraid of losing all your mails (backups)? Losing control over
> your email address? What are you going
Recently, my paranoia levels have been ratcheted up by reading about
companies' treatment of their users, along with an increasing awareness
of my powerlessness with respect to most content providers.
I therefore curbed most online activity and have attempted to host those
services I used on my own
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 10.10.2012 09:27, schrieb Dimitri Sabadie:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to contribute as a developper, but I don’t know where to begin. I
>> subscribe to the bug tracker and found an issue I really wanna fix :
>>
>> https://bugs.archlinux.org/tas
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> is there any free secondary dns provider that supports zone transfer?
> BTW: well, this is kind of off topic as it hasn't to do with arch, but help
> is needed... :P
> thanks in advance!
>
> --
> (\_ /) copy the bunny to
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> On Thursday 23 Aug 2012 21:47:14 Norbert Zeh wrote:
>> I tried to keep my mouth shut but can't resist to reply here because I
>> simply don't understand how you think the world works. Do you want to see
>> proof that every piece of open-
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Jean-Luc Bassereau wrote:
> Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:54:37 +0300
> Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> nope :(
>> take a look, /var/log/mail.log:
>> Aug 21 15:21:28 localhost postfix/smtpd[6461]: disconnect from
>> x.google.com[xxx..xxx.xxx]
>
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> On 03.08.2012 17:55, Menachem Moystoviz wrote:
>> I'll try to patch it tomorrow evening, along with PKGBUILD's manpage
>> and the wiki page.
>
> Wait for the next pacman version because all this VCS code is bein
ry to patch it tomorrow evening, along with PKGBUILD's manpage
and the wiki page.
Regards,
M
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:37 PM, arielp wrote:
> On 8/3/2012 6:56 AM, Menachem Moystoviz wrote:
>>
>> I am a bit confused regarding makepkg's versioning of packages.
>>
I am a bit confused regarding makepkg's versioning of packages.
>From what Allan said on this mailing list a couple of days ago, custom
support is being added to makepkg.
In addition, from what I can see on the wiki and manpages, the only
variable influencing the versioning is pkgver.
However, from
As far as I can tell from the systemd blog and people's reactions
here, the only advantages systemd offers are:
- Splitting the configuration files, which increases the robustness of
the configuration files
- Daemon supervision
- Bootup speedup by parallelizing the daemons.
However, from the respon
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:30 AM, wrote:
If everything is to end up in /usr, then I'd argue that this makes /usr
superfluous. If merging is to be done, then IMO things should be moved
out
of /usr, not moved in.
>>>
>>> well
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:46:52 +0200
> Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Yclept Nemo wrote:
>> > 3) Personally this depends on the final rc.conf, is [1] or [2] going
>> > to be it?
>> > [1]
>> > http://projects.archlin
21 matches
Mail list logo
