On 04/07/12 00:43, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 06:42:09AM +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>> On the flip side, most custom kernel users should be more savvy than the
>> average, do I don't see much of a problem. I maintain two aur kennels,
>> shall I implement the move now (seems like it'
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> - bump to latest version
>
> greetings
> tpowa
X still broken :(
Baho Utot wrote:
> This gives me an error
>
> /build/PKGBUILD: line 25: cd: /trinity.source/kdepim: Too many levels
> of symbolic links
>
> I want to symlink the svn repo to inside the chroot so when
> makechrootpkg -c -r creates the clean copy it doesn't have
> to copy the entire svn source code
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> Dedicated to the relatively-closed and more-constrained version of whats
> in the repos. Sure =)
>
> The distros have jumped fast, but I'm wondering about the Windows users
> of openoffice, seems to me none of them would try libreoffice just
> because its there (and frankly the p
Martín Cigorraga escribió:
> Thanks for your quick answer.
>
> @cantabile, @Dave
> Since I didn't upgraded core/filesystem package I have no issues with
> makepkg and FF.
>
> In fact I already installed Dropbox by downloading the PKGBUILD
> and the rest of the files and running makepkg as usual and
Ivan S. Freitas wrote:
>> I would be grateful for feedback to help improve the quality of the
>> document and if possible help testing that my experience was not a
>> fluke.
> After adding the user in the uucp group, is rebooting really
> necessary? I think that a logout/login would be enough.
Eve
Christian Larsson wrote:
> I know it doesn't adress the problem with flash, but are a side note. Most
> of us only use flash in order to view flash videos, an most of the time we
> also would like to download them. For this ytmp (
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40172) is a great substi
Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> I notice it's all under GFDL 1.2. I'm wanting to use a Gentoo doc
> for the Arch Security stuff but it's under a CC-SA attribution license
> which is incompatible with GFDL. Would it be possible to allow Wiki
> content under a CC licenses? I can't see it being too controve
David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'm usually quite good at one-liners, but my simple ones no longer work
> in
> Arch. Same cli works fine in suse. What have I messed up? To wit:
>
>
> What could keep the simple cli from working on Arch? I know this stuff
> worked
> before updates
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>> Under which circunstances would you envision the need to trust an old,
>> compromised signature?
>>
> New install, dev for a coupl of [extra] packages has already left the
> team. Having to recompile everytime a dev leaves the team is additional
> (unnecessary) hassle IMO,
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> We must have a system that allows pacman to automatically verify new
> developer keys and revoke old ones ... even more important, revoke them
> in a way that signatures made before a certain date are still accepted,
> but newer ones aren't.
> I don't see this easily being i
I wrote about this topic ~1 month ago.
You don't need PKCis or distribute the keyrings themselves. GPG supports
transitive trust.
The pacman keyring would be installed by default trusting on whatever keys
a pacman root signature has signed (there could also be a different master
key for community d
Piyush P Kurur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have configured a set of machines to authenticate
> against an LDAP database. For some machines we do not want the
> users to login via their normal shell but some custom program
> runs for them. For example if some one tries to login to the
> smtp server vi
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> Please note that you will need an Google Account to contribute. There
> have been two contributors till I think. Any more ? Come on guys its
> an Open Source project.
>
It won't have much visibility there. Have you considered creating it on
http://en.wikibooks.org/ or
David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> One thing I miss with Arch are init-script shortcuts for starting and
> stopping
> processes. rc-commands really help cut down on typing. For example, all suse
> did
> was to create links to the files in /etc/rc.d/... with a naming convention of
> rc. So,
Seems my message didn't get through.
It was just doing
rc() { /etc/rc.d/$*; }
And to get completion,
complete -o filenames -W "$(cd /etc/rc.d/ && echo *)" rc
That requires a relogin / sourcing the profile again to update
the completion (could be avoided with another function) but
it's neat and s
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 01:12:15PM +0200, Linas wrote:
>>
>>> If your main problem is to create playlists for a recursive music tree,
>>> I guess that
>>> this would work with pretty much all players:
>>> find /
If your main problem is to create playlists for a recursive music tree,
I guess that
this would work with pretty much all players:
find /path/to/music > music-list.m3u
$PLAYER music-list.m3u
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best
Damien Churchill wrote:
> I've got a rather confusing issue with man. Whenever I try and view a
> man page I just end up with a blank screen.
>
> http://www.imagebam.com/image/41dd5973332829
>
> This occurs for any page, even for local ones. I was wondering if
> anyone would be able to shed any lig
On 18/03/10 12:52, Mauro Santos wrote:
On 03/18/2010 09:10 AM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
0xf, 5, Who cares which it's called? As long as it contains the logical
partitions... But the ending sector thing will bug me if I don't fix it.
So for my piece of mind I'm gonna have to do somethin
Myra Nelson wrote:
There is one last problem with trust that no one can cure. You either
trust
the devs or you don't. This is illustrated by a classic quote from Ken
Thompson
"The moral is obvious. You can't trust code that you did not totally create
yourself. (Especially code from companies th
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
Any way I only mention it because When I got around to installing Arch on
one of the two partitions I recovered from Sabayon, I skipped the
installation step of letting cfdisk touch my partitions and simply selected
the partition I previously prepared for it with mkf
I had already this email draft in my head, but Ananda 'Arch Linux
security is still poor' thread, on which the point was also brought up,
moved me to really write it.
First off, there's an implicit level of trust on the package software,
no matter which OS you use.
When using Windows, you trus
Peter Cannon wrote:
pacman -Si xfce|less
and looked for a package that might get me to a minimal desktop I could work
with.
I thought maybe xfdesktop...
pacman -S xfdesktop
Why have you done this? If you look at the 'man' page you will see
http://linux.die.net/man/1/xfdesktop
xfdesktop
Xavier Chantry wrote:
The tiny size of the reopen textbox does not give a lot of freedom for
justifications either.
I think this is completely missing the point though. I don't
understand why Dan is the only developer who sees that it sometimes
makes sense to provide additional information on clo
Byron Clark wrote:
Unfortunately that only works if there is only one sshd process returned
by pidof. Here's the case I'm worried about:
/var/run/sshd.pid: 343
pidof sshd: 3433
And the case where add ^$ around the pid breaks:
/var/run/sshd.pid: 343
pidof sshd: 343 2452 2453
Yes of
Byron Clark wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:32:15AM -0700, Byron Clark wrote:
if pidof sshd | grep -q $(cat /var/run/sshd.pid); then
echo "pid in /var/run/sshd.pid is valid"
else
echo "invalid pid"
fi
Ignore that, it isn't entirely safe.
You may want grep -q "^$(cat
Carlos Mennens wrote:
Yes I am very familiar with that Wiki article but find Swap on RAID is
useless, no? For my scenario I was going to do the following and
please correct me if you think this is wrong:
It is useful if you want to continue running the system even with a
failed disk (witho
Aaron Griffin wrote:
However, this is a mailing list. Not everyone is aware of the "state"
of the list at any given time. It's best to bottom post and only
reference relevant material so that even someone coming upon the 15th
email in a chain is able to read just that email and understand it for
29 matches
Mail list logo
