Em 10/05/2017 18:25, "DR via arch-general"
escreveu:
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Doug Newgard
wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2017 15:33:59 -0400
> DR via arch-general wrote:
>
> > It's breaking 32bit chrome and other stuffs.
> >
> > Regards.
>
> There is no 32 bit Chrome anymore. What "other stu
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Doug Newgard
wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2017 15:33:59 -0400
> DR via arch-general wrote:
>
> > It's breaking 32bit chrome and other stuffs.
> >
> > Regards.
>
> There is no 32 bit Chrome anymore. What "other stuffs"?
>
There's if I build it myself. Maybe I should've
On Wed, 10 May 2017 15:33:59 -0400
DR via arch-general wrote:
> It's breaking 32bit chrome and other stuffs.
>
> Regards.
There is no 32 bit Chrome anymore. What "other stuffs"?
On 05/10/2017 03:33 PM, DR via arch-general wrote:
> It's breaking 32bit chrome and other stuffs.
It's already flagged as out-of-date, no need to go complaining on the
mailing list though.
While it may be disappointing that a package actually goes a whole 2
weeks without getting updated, these th
It's breaking 32bit chrome and other stuffs.
Regards.
For some reason I sent this to arch-dev-public instead, sending again here…
On 2017-05-10 04:27, Pablo Roberto Lezaeta Reyes via arch-general
wrote:
> You should clarify if this affect user cloning the servers repos by
> rsync to set they non-tiered local repos (*.pkg.tag.xzs) or just the
> pkgb
6 matches
Mail list logo