On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 08:31:21 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>On 08/03/17 08:14, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>> On 03/07/2017 05:04 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> I confirm that apulse-git works with Firefox 52.0-1 and an asoundrc
>>> isn't required :).
>>
>> Keep in mind that firefox 52.0-2 us
On 08/03/17 08:14, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> On 03/07/2017 05:04 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:18:19 +0100, LoneVVolf wrote:
>>> On 07-03-17 21:14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:00:18 +0100, Carlchristian Eckert wrote:
> As a workaround, have y
On 03/07/2017 05:04 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:18:19 +0100, LoneVVolf wrote:
>> On 07-03-17 21:14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:00:18 +0100, Carlchristian Eckert wrote:
As a workaround, have you tried using apulse? It is a pulseaudio
emulation for A
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:18:19 +0100, LoneVVolf wrote:
>On 07-03-17 21:14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:00:18 +0100, Carlchristian Eckert wrote:
>>> As a workaround, have you tried using apulse? It is a pulseaudio
>>> emulation for ALSA. Some time ago, I used it successfully to run
>
On 07-03-17 21:14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:00:18 +0100, Carlchristian Eckert wrote:
As a workaround, have you tried using apulse? It is a pulseaudio
emulation for ALSA. Some time ago, I used it successfully to run Skype
(which also depends on pulseaudio) without having pulseaud
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:00:18 +0100, Carlchristian Eckert wrote:
>As a workaround, have you tried using apulse? It is a pulseaudio
>emulation for ALSA. Some time ago, I used it successfully to run Skype
>(which also depends on pulseaudio) without having pulseaudio installed.
I don't know, if the r
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:05:46 -0500
> Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>
> > On 03/07/2017 12:01 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general wrote:
> > > On 07/03/17, Peter Munch-Ellingsen wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >> the Nim package: https://www
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:05:46 -0500
Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> On 03/07/2017 12:01 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general wrote:
> > On 07/03/17, Peter Munch-Ellingsen wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> the Nim package: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/nim/
> >> was marked out
On 03/07/2017 12:01 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general wrote:
> On 07/03/17, Peter Munch-Ellingsen wrote:
>> Hi,
>> the Nim package: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/nim/
>> was marked out of date on 2016-10-24 but it's still not edited to reflect
>> the new version of 0.1
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:32:30PM +0100, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
> So what? Is linux now about restricting user choice?
> While I generally agree with the referenced text, using it to justify
> restricting user chouce without reason is just
> nonsence. The way it is used, it is also one
>
> So what? Is linux now about restricting user choice?
>
Arch is a pragmatic distribution, both for the users and developers.
Upstream decided to make pulseaudio a hard dependency specifically to
reduce maintenance costs on their end. Arch devs really aren't in the
business of adopting such main
On 07/03/17, Peter Munch-Ellingsen wrote:
> Hi,
> the Nim package: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/nim/
> was marked out of date on 2016-10-24 but it's still not edited to reflect
> the new version of 0.16.2. Would anyone be so kind to adopt this package?
> If not could the pack
Hi,
the Nim package: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/nim/
was marked out of date on 2016-10-24 but it's still not edited to reflect
the new version of 0.16.2. Would anyone be so kind to adopt this package?
If not could the package be dropped to AUR?
Peter
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:23:42PM +0100, Christian Rebischke wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:26:55AM +0100, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
> > Building firefox takes hours making this not really an option for many
> > users.
> > Arch has deviated before from the upstream default, I see no re
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:26:55AM +0100, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
> Building firefox takes hours making this not really an option for many users.
> Arch has deviated before from the upstream default, I see no reason why we
> should follow upstream by restricting the
> choice of the user.
And make a package for firefox-esr[1]? It could maintain the ALSA support
and plugins support.
[1]: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/
2017-03-07 16:14 GMT+01:00 jjgaris via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org>:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:00:18PM +0100, Carlchristian Ec
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:00:18PM +0100, Carlchristian Eckert wrote:
> As a workaround, have you tried using apulse? It is a pulseaudio emulation
> for ALSA. Some time ago, I used it successfully to run Skype (which also
> depends on pulseaudio) without having pulseaudio installed.
>
I was just
As a workaround, have you tried using apulse? It is a pulseaudio
emulation for ALSA. Some time ago, I used it successfully to run Skype
(which also depends on pulseaudio) without having pulseaudio installed.
Am 07.03.2017 um 10:49 schrieb SanskritFritz via arch-general:
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:09:16 +0100, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
>One solution I could think of is an alternative firefox package (not
>in AUR) that still allows users to make their own choice. Would that
>be a possibility?
Hi,
I build with
[rocketmouse@archlinux firefox]$ grep enable-alsa PKG
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 01:58:15PM +0100, Damjan Georgievski via arch-general
wrote:
> > Since the update to firefox 52 the audio support has been broken.
>
> nope, it works fine.
>
> alas, ALSA support in Firefox has become unmaintained …
> this means if Arch reverts to ALSA it'll be shipping w
On 07/03/17 23:09, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
> One solution I could think of is an alternative firefox package (not in AUR)
> that still allows users to make their own
> choice. Would that be a possibility?
No.
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:48:59PM +0100, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> On 2017-03-07 10:26, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:00:12PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> On 07/03/17 18:29, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
> >>> Since the update to firefox 52 the audio suppo
> Since the update to firefox 52 the audio support has been broken.
nope, it works fine.
alas, ALSA support in Firefox has become unmaintained …
this means if Arch reverts to ALSA it'll be shipping worse code just
for the few people that choose to not use Pulseaudio (for their own
reasons).
> Th
On 03/07/17 at 12:15pm, LoneVVolf wrote:
> if we really want to follow firefox upstream, we should :
> - stop replacing the libraries upstream bundles with system libs,
> - disable gold linker
> - disable pie
> - disable rust support
>
> etc.
>
> We don't follow upstream firefox now, do you have
On 2017-03-07 10:26, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:00:12PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 07/03/17 18:29, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
>>> Since the update to firefox 52 the audio support has been broken.
>>> This seems to be because pulse audio is now a dependenc
On 07-03-17 10:00, Allan McRae wrote:
Upstream changed to pulseaudio by default. Arch follows upstream
You can compile firefox yourself to set it being alsa only.
A
Allan,
if we really want to follow firefox upstream, we should :
- stop replacing the libraries upstream bundles with syste
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:26:55 +0100, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
>Building firefox takes hours making this not really an option for many
>users.
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:49:25 +0100, SanskritFritz via arch-general wrote:
>Does a kind soul provide an alternative build of Firefox?
Assuming time shou
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:36 AM, fnodeuser wrote:
> test
This worked.
Thanks for your effort.
cheers!
mar77i
test
Reply-To is not what you are supposed to look into; look at In-Reply-To!
On 03/07/2017 11:06 AM, fnodeuser wrote:
> test
>
--
GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96 7808
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
test
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM, jjgaris via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:00:12PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> > On 07/03/17 18:29, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
> > > Since the update to firefox 52 the audio support has been broken.
> > > This se
fnodeuser writes:
> Bartłomiej Piotrowski,
>
> it is the same email address that i have been using since the beginning.
>
> what opinions?
>
> i never talk with opinions. i always talk with facts.
Hi. You may not notice your current reply function broke this thread.
What is your mail client?
I b
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:00:12PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 07/03/17 18:29, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
> > Since the update to firefox 52 the audio support has been broken.
> > This seems to be because pulse audio is now a dependency by default in
> > firefox.
> > However firefox can st
On 03/07/17 at 10:03am, fnodeuser wrote:
> Bartłomiej Piotrowski,
>
> it is the same email address that i have been using since the beginning.
>
> what opinions?
>
> i never talk with opinions. i always talk with facts.
You broke the thread again. If you want to be taken serious atleast
rep
Bartłomiej Piotrowski,
it is the same email address that i have been using since the beginning.
what opinions?
i never talk with opinions. i always talk with facts.
On 07/03/17 18:29, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
> Since the update to firefox 52 the audio support has been broken.
> This seems to be because pulse audio is now a dependency by default in
> firefox.
> However firefox can still be build with ALSA support.
>
> Without getting into any dicussion
On 2017-03-07 09:36, fnodeuser wrote:
> why are you talking on her behalf? why did she send a message to you instead
> of one to the ML?
> why is she not answering any questions in this ML?
Why do you keep breaking threads on our mailing lists? Why you are
incapable of using one e-mail address? W
Eli Schwartz,
no one is paranoid here. we do not want security and privacy issues.
YANG Ling,
sharing the requested data will not benefit us in any way.
Lukas Fleischer,
why are you talking on her behalf? why did she send a message to you instead of
one to the ML?
why is she not answering any
Since the update to firefox 52 the audio support has been broken.
This seems to be because pulse audio is now a dependency by default in firefox.
However firefox can still be build with ALSA support.
Without getting into any dicussion about issues about pulseaudio itself, I
believe it should be p
40 matches
Mail list logo
