On 07/03/17 23:09, jjgaris via arch-general wrote: > One solution I could think of is an alternative firefox package (not in AUR) > that still allows users to make their own > choice. Would that be a possibility?
No.
- [arch-general] Firefox 52 Audio broken jjgaris via arch-general
- Re: [arch-general] Firefox 52 Aud... Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-general] Firefox 52... jjgaris via arch-general
- Re: [arch-general] Firefo... SanskritFritz via arch-general
- Re: [arch-general] Fi... Ralf Mardorf
- Re: [arch-general] Fi... Carlchristian Eckert
- Re: [arch-genera... jjgaris via arch-general
- Re: [arch-ge... Óscar García Amor
- Re: [arch-general] Firefo... Bartłomiej Piotrowski
- Re: [arch-general] Fi... jjgaris via arch-general
- Re: [arch-genera... Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-genera... Ralf Mardorf
- Re: [arch-general] Firefo... Christian Rebischke
- Re: [arch-general] Fi... jjgaris via arch-general
- Re: [arch-genera... Christian Rebischke
- Re: [arch-genera... Maxwell Anselm via arch-general
- Re: [arch-general] Firefox 52... LoneVVolf
- Re: [arch-general] Firefo... Jelle van der Waa
- Re: [arch-general] Firefox 52 Aud... Damjan Georgievski via arch-general
- Re: [arch-general] Firefox 52... jjgaris via arch-general
