On 01/09/2017 09:45 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>
>> I still try to use cblrepo to track dependency versions, I just don't
>> use it to generate PKGBUILDs directly.
>
> I *love* hearing that it's being used. I'm just throwing this out
> there... if ArchHaskell goes the way of the dodo I'd be more
On 01/09/2017 06:23 PM, Nicola Squartini via arch-general wrote:
> > 1. How do you manage dependencies and rebuilds of Haskell packages
> > without using cblrepo?
>
> I still try to use cblrepo to track dependency versions, I just don't
> use it to generate PKGBUILDs directly.
>
> > 2. Shouldn't
Am Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:46:08 -0600
schrieb mike lojkovic via arch-general :
> As far as I'm aware BTRFS would be a better choice. Believe it's
> getting close to release.
Honestly, I don't agree. NILFS has features that Btrfs will never have,
simply because of it's design. NILFS is based on increm
Le 09/01/2017 à 20:18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general a écrit :
> On 01/09/2017 02:07 PM, Bruno Pagani via arch-general wrote:
>>> Does this mean we will see 4.8.16 being built and pushed out to users?
>> This could indeed be done (it’s even 4.8.17 as of today) if 4.9.2 still
>> doesn’t fix those i
On 01/09/2017 02:07 PM, Bruno Pagani via arch-general wrote:
>> Does this mean we will see 4.8.16 being built and pushed out to users?
>
> This could indeed be done (it’s even 4.8.17 as of today) if 4.9.2 still
> doesn’t fix those issues (it has been discussed before that Arch should
> continue to
Le 09/01/2017 à 12:24, Phil Wyett via arch-general a écrit :
> On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 12:06 +0100, fredbezies via arch-general wrote:
>> Sorry to reply to Phil Wyet this way. I enabled digest mode for arch-
>> general.
>>
>> You won't see soon linux 4.9.x in core because it is kinda rotten
>> with
As far as I'm aware BTRFS would be a better choice. Believe it's getting
close to release.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Alexander Rath
wrote:
> Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2017 17:20:49 CET schrieb Sean Greenslade:
>
>> On January 9, 2017 7:39:26 AM PST, Alexander Rath <
>> alexander.r...@posteo.ne
Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2017 17:20:49 CET schrieb Sean Greenslade:
On January 9, 2017 7:39:26 AM PST, Alexander Rath
wrote:
Hello!
I'd like to share a link to this description/tutorial about NILFS2:
https://forum.manjaro.org/t/nilfs-a-filesystem-designed-to-minimize-the-likelyhood-of-data-loss/15
On 09-01-2017 15:39, Alexander Rath wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'd like to share a link to this description/tutorial about NILFS2:
> https://forum.manjaro.org/t/nilfs-a-filesystem-designed-to-minimize-the-likelyhood-of-data-loss/15091
>
> Did anybody try to install Arch on a NILFS2-formatted partition?
On January 9, 2017 7:39:26 AM PST, Alexander Rath
wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I'd like to share a link to this description/tutorial about NILFS2:
>https://forum.manjaro.org/t/nilfs-a-filesystem-designed-to-minimize-the-likelyhood-of-data-loss/15091
>
>Did anybody try to install Arch on a NILFS2-formatted p
Hello!
I'd like to share a link to this description/tutorial about NILFS2:
https://forum.manjaro.org/t/nilfs-a-filesystem-designed-to-minimize-the-likelyhood-of-data-loss/15091
Did anybody try to install Arch on a NILFS2-formatted partition?
Best regards,
Alexander
Felix Yan writes:
> On 01/09/2017 07:26 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> Well, the subject line says it all really. Does ArchHaskell still
>> have a role in the Arch world?
>
> Actually I am planning to make everything dynamic-linked in next GHC
> release, and kill all static libraries in the packa
Johan Holmquist writes:
> I'd say that binary packages are really valuable for installing a
> global haskell dev environment for quick hacks and scripts for which
> it would not be practical to setup a project and download and build a
> lot of deps. At least ghc and base should be installed glob
On 01/08/2017 08:11 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> I'll download a new iso and try, but I'd be
> surprised if an iso less than 5 months old no longer works?
>
Well IMO 5 months is pretty damn ancient in the Arch Linux world. :p
Most of the time a simple keyring package update does the trick:
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 12:06 +0100, fredbezies via arch-general wrote:
> Sorry to reply to Phil Wyet this way. I enabled digest mode for arch-
> general.
>
> You won't see soon linux 4.9.x in core because it is kinda rotten
> with
> some Intel CPUs.
>
> You cannot get it to boot on some intel CPUs
Sorry to reply to Phil Wyet this way. I enabled digest mode for arch-general.
You won't see soon linux 4.9.x in core because it is kinda rotten with
some Intel CPUs.
You cannot get it to boot on some intel CPUs like an old T4200 or younger ones.
See these bugs reports :
https://bugs.archlinux.o
On 01/09/2017 07:26 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Well, the subject line says it all really. Does ArchHaskell still have
> a role in the Arch world?
Actually I am planning to make everything dynamic-linked in next GHC
release, and kill all static libraries in the packages. This way haskell
software
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 00:26 +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Well, the subject line says it all really. Does ArchHaskell still
> have
> a role in the Arch world?
Thanks Magnus for raising this topic.
I actually have a few questions for the maintener of Haskell in
[community] (Felix):
18 matches
Mail list logo
