Re: [arch-general] interested in becoming a TU

2016-08-15 Thread Storm Dragon via arch-general
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:06:26AM -0500, Doug Newgard wrote: Looking at things, none of your AUR packages are really candidates for Community. The guideline is 10 votes. So let's look at the accessibility side of things. I was going to suggest contacting the maintainers of the packages you are

Re: [arch-general] interested in becoming a TU

2016-08-15 Thread Doug Newgard
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:21:29 -0400 Storm Dragon via arch-general wrote: > Howdy, > I am interested in becoming a TU. I have several packages in the AUR, > including magic-wormhole{,-git}, rndsig, libsonic-git, rsgames, etc. > My main area of interested, in maintinaing packages as a TU, would be

Re: [arch-general] interested in becoming a TU

2016-08-15 Thread Storm Dragon via arch-general
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 04:37:21PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:21:29 -0400, Storm Dragon via arch-general wrote:, I am interested in becoming a TU. Oops, the above was the wrong quote and link. "Addition of a TU The addition of a TU may occur at any time. In order to

Re: [arch-general] interested in becoming a TU

2016-08-15 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:30:05 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:21:29 -0400, Storm Dragon via arch-general >wrote:, >>I am interested in becoming a TU. > >"SVP begins with a proposal, for example the addition of a TU or an >amendment to the bylaws. The proposal should be clear and

Re: [arch-general] interested in becoming a TU

2016-08-15 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:21:29 -0400, Storm Dragon via arch-general wrote:, >I am interested in becoming a TU. "SVP begins with a proposal, for example the addition of a TU or an amendment to the bylaws. The proposal should be clear and concise and it must be posted on the aur-general mailing list (

[arch-general] interested in becoming a TU

2016-08-15 Thread Storm Dragon via arch-general
Howdy, I am interested in becoming a TU. I have several packages in the AUR, including magic-wormhole{,-git}, rndsig, libsonic-git, rsgames, etc. My main area of interested, in maintinaing packages as a TU, would be accessibility related items, E.G. orca, speech-dispatcher, espeakup. Before I ac

Re: [arch-general] very out of date packages

2016-08-15 Thread Genes Lists via arch-general
On Sun, 2016-08-14 at 15:27 -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > I would argue it is not the raw number or percentage of packages that > are out of date, but *which* packages are out of date.  For example, > I > wouldn't place equal weight on pychess as I would glibc.    Agree with this completely -