On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 02:16:23AM +0800, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2012-09-28 12:01:01 +0200] Nicolas Sebrecht:
> > The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> >
> > > We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
> > > posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollut
On 09/28/2012 11:19 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> I'm having an issue updating a system that boots over NFS. Attempting to
> upgrade the iputils package results in the following:
>
> ---8<---
> (1/1) upgrading iputils
> [##
[2012-09-28 12:01:01 +0200] Nicolas Sebrecht:
> The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>
> > We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
> > posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollute threads
> > with fear, uncertainty, doubt, and just sheer incompetence.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Rodrigo Rivas
wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I know, this should go to the bugtracker, but I couldn't find the
> `arch-install-scripts` anywhere... so I'm bringing it here.
>
> I've just installed a new Arch in a VM using the new & improved
> `archlinux-2012.09.07-dual.is
On 28 Sep 2012 11:34, "Tom Gundersen" wrote:
>
> An option could be to enable moderation on dev-public, still defaulting to
> rejecting everything, but allow through high-quality contributions from
the
> outside.
>
I concur this idea, but who's is going to moderate it? You should consider
that als
Did you have any luck solving this? I am having a very similar problem.
Fonts that loaded at one time, no longer load.
JC
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2012 12:01 PM, "Nicolas Sebrecht" wrote:
>>
>> The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>>
>> > We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
>> > posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollute
I'm having an issue updating a system that boots over NFS. Attempting to
upgrade the iputils package results in the following:
---8<---
(1/1) upgrading iputils
[###] 100%
Failed to set capabilities on file `usr/bin
According to this bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/31424 I lost all
my files yesterday.
So this is a warning to all users who are wondering about the “git
daemon user” – that is really a demon!
Apologies,
Just noticed the "[arch-general] utmp MIA" thread and FS#31705 as
pointed out by Tom in said thread.
(I blame Friday night boozing)
--
Simon Perry (aka Pezz)
pgpY0g4mmRY5T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Simon Perry wrote:
> /var/log/utmp is not being used.
>
> Updated procps-ng on the 24th, systemd 192 update on the 27th, but have
> only just noticed this.
>
> Running a "w" command no longer shows current logged in users.
>
> An strace of /usr/bin/w shows:
>
> access(
/var/log/utmp is not being used.
Updated procps-ng on the 24th, systemd 192 update on the 27th, but have
only just noticed this.
Running a "w" command no longer shows current logged in users.
An strace of /usr/bin/w shows:
access("/var/run/utmpx", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT
(No such file or directory)
o
The 28/09/12, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> An option could be to enable moderation on dev-public, still defaulting to
> rejecting everything, but allow through high-quality contributions from the
> outside.
>
> I agree that we should create a venue for would-be contributors to engage
> with us, but i a
On Sep 28, 2012 12:01 PM, "Nicolas Sebrecht" wrote:
>
> The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>
> > We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
> > posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollute threads
> > with fear, uncertainty, doubt, and just sheer incom
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2012 12:12 PM, "Jorge Almeida" wrote:
>
> Sounds like FS#31705.
>
Thank you.
J.
On Sep 28, 2012 12:12 PM, "Jorge Almeida" wrote:
>
> I ran pacman -Syu yesterday, and now on boot the file /run/utmp is not
> created. Anyone else with this problem? (Yes, /var/run is a symlink to
/run)
>
> (I also changed from grub2 to syslinux, but I suppose this has nothing to
do
> with the pro
I ran pacman -Syu yesterday, and now on boot the file /run/utmp is not
created. Anyone else with this problem? (Yes, /var/run is a symlink to /run)
(I also changed from grub2 to syslinux, but I suppose this has nothing to do
with the problem; it boots fine. This is the only difference in installed
The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
> posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollute threads
> with fear, uncertainty, doubt, and just sheer incompetence.
I'm very confident that an open dev mailing list with
[2012-09-28 11:38:13 +0200] Nicolas Sebrecht:
> What you're calling crap are all technical content that could gain with
> direct emulation with official maintainers.
We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollut
On 28/09/12 19:38, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> BTW, what a wonderfull attitude from you to non official people. Highly
> contructive and motivating. Thanks.
Thanks.
The 28/09/12, Allan McRae wrote:
> If all that crap went to arch-dev-public, I would have to unsubscribe
> there too.
What you're calling crap are all technical content that could gain with
direct emulation with official maintainers.
BTW, what a wonderfull attitude from you to non official peopl
On 28/09/12 19:01, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 27/09/12, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>
>> Can you give some examples of discussions you would see moving to
>> archlinux-dev?
>
> Sure.
>
> Subject: [arch-general] Modifying archiso
> From: Robbie Smith
> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:47:11 +1000
The 27/09/12, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> > The 27/09/12, Tobias Frilling wrote:
> >
> > The problem is not at the general mailing list but at the dev mailing
> > list side.
>
> archlinux-dev is for contributors and as long somebody is just
23 matches
Mail list logo
