Felipe Contreras [2012.08.23 2214 +0200]:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Andrew Hills wrote:
> > Felipe--if I may address you by your first name--in case you're
> > confused about why no one will listen to your arguments, let me
> > try to explain; it may reduce your frustration. You made the
Could default templates be provided in the post_install(){} hook for
the systemd package? Something like
post_install() {
if [ ! -e /etc/timezone ] ; then
cat > /etc/timezone < /etc/hostname
fi
}
That way, on upgrade, they would not be overwritten, but on install
you would at least have working
>> if arch would provide you with defaults every time the defaults get
>> updated
>> you would get *.pacnew files in your etc. since those files are depending
>> on
>> your system and are user choice it would not be good to provide those.
>>
>> By that logic, wouldn't I also not get an rc.conf file
2012/8/23 Stephen E. Baker :
> On 23/08/2012 4:14 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> Is systemd ready? Where is the evidence?
>
>
> https://www.archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics shows that about 14% of
> arch users who are using pkgstat have systemd installed. It is not default
> and no
On 23/08/2012 4:41 PM, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op donderdag 23 augustus 2012 16:14:26 schreef Qadri:
Hi all,
Given all the hullabaloo about systemd I thought I'd try it out. I went to
the wiki and saw that it has listed several "native systemd configuration
files" that it looks for, and if they're
On 23/08/2012 4:14 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
[snip]
Is systemd ready? Where is the evidence?
https://www.archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics shows that about 14% of
arch users who are using pkgstat have systemd installed. It is not
default and not depended on by anything, so that means a
Op donderdag 23 augustus 2012 16:14:26 schreef Qadri:
> Hi all,
>
> Given all the hullabaloo about systemd I thought I'd try it out. I went to
> the wiki and saw that it has listed several "native systemd configuration
> files" that it looks for, and if they're absent, it takes info from
> rc.conf
Ben Booth wrote:
> In case anyone's still interested in this, I found a pacman.conf option
> called NoExtract, which lets you tell pacman not to overwrite certain
> files and directories in the filesystem. So you could add the following
> line to /etc/pacman.conf:
>
> NoExtract = /usr/bin/python
In case anyone's still interested in this, I found a pacman.conf option
called NoExtract, which lets you tell pacman not to overwrite certain files
and directories in the filesystem. So you could add the following line to
/etc/pacman.conf:
NoExtract = /usr/bin/python
which would prevent pacman
Hi all,
Given all the hullabaloo about systemd I thought I'd try it out. I went to
the wiki and saw that it has listed several "native systemd configuration
files" that it looks for, and if they're absent, it takes info from
rc.conf. It's "strongly advised" (by the wiki) to use the native files.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Andrew Hills wrote:
> Felipe--if I may address you by your first name--in case you're
> confused about why no one will listen to your arguments, let me
> try to explain; it may reduce your frustration. You made the
> following two statements without any evidence o
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Felipe Contreras <
felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Anyway we are talking about 2 seconds...
>
> We are talking about a difference of 100%.
>
> --
> Felipe Contreras
>
You are being pedantic. A 2 second difference is negligible, and certainly
not the huge iss
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Sebastian Günther wrote:
> * Felipe Contreras (felipe.contre...@gmail.com) [22.08.12 02:22]:
>> Funny that you say "around the same time", when it's clearly less than
>> 6 seconds, so it's 15% slower, but that's the second instance of kdm.
>> The first instance st
>
> I don't think we will block the move to core on an isolated hardware
> crash that affects only a single user.
Sure.
> Still, can you give us the link to the kernel bugzilla report for this
> crash?
>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46381
--
xmpp: b...@schafweide.org
bjo.no
Am 23.08.2012 18:29, schrieb Geert Hendrickx:
> Since upgrading to 3.5.x, my system with mdraid mirror boots with either
> a degraded RAID array, or not auto-discovering the RAID at all.
>
> The disks are fine, confirmed by both SMART selftest and badblocks scan.
> Downgraded back to 3.4.9 and the
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 16:10:26 +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> 3.5.x is not yet ready to move to [core],
> - ext4 regression is not fixed yet, will be fixed in 3.5.3
> - watchdogs are completely broken
> I'm not sure how much of a showstopper the watchdogs are, so please
> sho
Am 23.08.2012 18:10, schrieb Bjoern Franke:
> Am Donnerstag, den 23.08.2012, 16:10 +0200 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> 3.5.x is not yet ready to move to [core],
>> - ext4 regression is not fixed yet, will be fixed in 3.5.3
>> - watchdogs are completely broken
>> I'm not sure how mu
Am Donnerstag, den 23.08.2012, 16:10 +0200 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> Hi guys,
>
> 3.5.x is not yet ready to move to [core],
> - ext4 regression is not fixed yet, will be fixed in 3.5.3
> - watchdogs are completely broken
> I'm not sure how much of a showstopper the watchdogs are, so please
>
Hi everyone,
I created a package for the Enttec Open DMX USB driver. It is
available in the AUR under the name dmx_usb-git.
>From Wikipedia:
DMX512 is a standard for digital communication networks that are
commonly used to control stage lighting and effects. It was originally
intended as a standa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
\begin{quote}
While the main approach of Arch is to use vanilla software, as
possible; Arch devs have to follow upstream decisions and at some
point Arch and other distros fall into software those hide things from
end users. I think most of the main up
Hi guys,
3.5.x is not yet ready to move to [core],
- ext4 regression is not fixed yet, will be fixed in 3.5.3
- watchdogs are completely broken
I'm not sure how much of a showstopper the watchdogs are, so please
shout out if this is a real problem.
If you have any other showstopper please let
> trying to be corporate software.
I've been wondering what the best term for 'corporate' or 'enterprise'
software like exchange is where they change your nappies for you but
also offer you razor wire to hang yourself with by giving you IE to
browse the web on the mail server itself and encouragin
I think these discussions will not change the result for Arch. Sooner
or later Arch will have to seperate its way from its KISS philosophy.
While the main approach of Arch is to use vanilla software, as
possible; Arch devs have to follow upstream decisions and at some
point Arch and other distros f
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Sebastian Günther wrote:
> * Kwpolska (kwpol...@gmail.com) [22.08.12 10:19]:
>>
>> Were* and it's not likely. Anyone can happily send you a message like
>> that. You just need to POST email=ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
>> login-unsub=Unsubscribe to
>> http://mailm
Am 23.08.2012 05:28, schrieb Jayesh Badwaik:
> On Thursday 23 Aug 2012 01:28:58 Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> BINARIES="pacman"
>> FILES="/etc/pacman.conf /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist"
>>
>> Then, edit /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux.preset:
>>
>> Add:
>>
>> pacman_config="/etc/mkinitcpio-pacman.conf"
>> pacman_ima
25 matches
Mail list logo
