On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:46:52 +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > 4.2) To be clear, is there going to be a separate configuration for
> > the HARDWARECLOCK and TIMEZONE variables?
>
> There already are. That's the problem. HARDWARECLOCK is configured in
> the third line of /etc/adjtime (see hwclock
Tom:
>From your latest update to the initscripts in the git repo.
This makes sure that systemd supports some initscripts API's. With this
patch, systemd will:
* Parse and use DAEMONS and MODULES from rc.conf
* Run rc.local and rc.local.shutdown on boot and shutdown respectively
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2012 02:53 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
> Please file bugs if you think there are errors. Sometimes
> "Type=forking" is the right thing to do. If the daemon is not
> socket/dbus actiavted, then Type=forking is the only way to know if
> a serv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2012 02:24 PM, Damjan wrote:
>
> I don't know what's that "kill dictd" but if it's a subprocess
> started from your java program, systemd can handle it too. It puts
> every service in its own CGroup so it know all the processes
> started from
Hello,
I have a system which is hanging during boot at the line "Booting the
kernel" when I have a drive connected to either port of the PCI-Express
SATA card I recently installed (chipset ASM1061). When a drive is not
connected to the card, the system boots normally, and connecting the
drive to
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:39 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>> for example, i modify several .service files -- even ones that are
>> shipped upstream -- because they are pointlessly configured as
>> `forking` when they could be much better i
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Nelson Marambio wrote:
> Well, the cat-concept was the one I tried before - it may work fine for mp3s
> with CBR, but with VBR it fails because you get an inaccurate track length.
There are several tools to recalculate the VBR header; `mp3diags` is
one of them.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
On 07/27/2012 02:24 PM, Damjan wrote:
>> So now that I've got a network through systemd, I ran into
>> trouble with some daemon service files that I crafted by hand.
>>
>> None of the following directives will work (culled from different
>> f
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:39 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> for example, i modify several .service files -- even ones that are
> shipped upstream -- because they are pointlessly configured as
> `forking` when they could be much better integrated (ddclient, dhcpd,
> hostapd, SEVERAL unfortunately
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:39 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> also note that you likely want to simply run the service differently
> that you had previously.
>
> for example, i modify several .service files -- even ones that are
> shipped upstream -- because they are pointlessly configured as
> `f
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:04 PM, David Benfell
wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 02:01 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>
>> Not really, as far as I know. However, it seems that it is common
>> to put "helper scripts" that are shipped with systemd in
>> /usr/lib/systemd/ and those shipped with udev in /usr/lib/udev
So now that I've got a network through systemd, I ran into trouble
with some daemon service files that I crafted by hand.
None of the following directives will work (culled from different files):
ExecStartPre=cd /etc/solr
Use:
WorkingDirectory=
ExecStart=$JAVA_HOME/bin/java -jar $JAVA_OPTS s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2012 02:01 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
> Not really, as far as I know. However, it seems that it is common
> to put "helper scripts" that are shipped with systemd in
> /usr/lib/systemd/ and those shipped with udev in /usr/lib/udev/,
> so for
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:52 PM, David Benfell
wrote:
> So now that I've got a network through systemd, I ran into trouble
> with some daemon service files that I crafted by hand.
>
> None of the following directives will work (culled from different files):
>
> ExecStartPre=cd /etc/solr
> ExecSta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
So now that I've got a network through systemd, I ran into trouble
with some daemon service files that I crafted by hand.
None of the following directives will work (culled from different files):
ExecStartPre=cd /etc/solr
ExecStart=$JAVA_HOM
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> On 27.07.2012 22:11, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>> Is there a way to enable the testing repo and install updates (with
>> pacman -Suyy) from the other repositories and only install updates
>> from testing if I explicitly mention it with some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/2012 09:19 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
(that it worked for him. Does anyone know how to fix Thunderbird's
quoting so that it actually quotes?)
Okay, so this will be a real shocker. I was wrong. It works for me as
well. Unsurprisingly, I ha
On 27.07.2012 22:11, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> Is there a way to enable the testing repo and install updates (with
> pacman -Suyy) from the other repositories and only install updates
> from testing if I explicitly mention it with some pacman command?
Move [testing] below [extra] and [core] in
You should never cherry pick updatates. It is all or nothing. Altought you
can use syntax -S repo/pkgname. But if you are going to do that remember
that I will be slaughtered for sharing this information, if you go
complaining about how that broke your system. As long as you dont install
system lib
Hey list,
Is there a way to enable the testing repo and install updates (with
pacman -Suyy) from the other repositories and only install updates
from testing if I explicitly mention it with some pacman command?
Thanks
--
Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health.
#include
int main(){
tracepath dimitrisze.com:
1: 192.168.1.300.038ms pmtu 1500
1: 192.168.1.1 0.529ms asymm 2
1: 192.168.1.1 0.517ms asymm 2
2: no reply
3: no reply
ping dimitrisze.com:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Jameson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jameson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
wrote:
> Unf
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Jameson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jameson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
>>> wrote:
Unfortunately none of my computers have multi-device btrfs now, u
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jameson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
>> wrote:
>>> Unfortunately none of my computers have multi-device btrfs now, used
>>> to have one for testing a couple of years ago
>>
Hi,
I installed btrfs-progs from testing and regenerated the image
using mkinitcpio. It works fine and my btrfs volume is still being
mounted correctly. I use systemd though and don't have any multi
device btrfs volume either.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> On 07/27/2
On 07/27/2012 01:04 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Seems not many of us yet use btrfs, I therefore would like to ask if
> any users can signoff on the btrfs-progs in testing (i.e. verify that
> the package appears to work).
>
> In particular, I'm interested to hear if someone who uses bt
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jameson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
> wrote:
>> Unfortunately none of my computers have multi-device btrfs now, used
>> to have one for testing a couple of years ago
>
> I have a multi-device volume, but I'm running systemd. I c
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
wrote:
> Unfortunately none of my computers have multi-device btrfs now, used
> to have one for testing a couple of years ago
I have a multi-device volume, but I'm running systemd. I can validate
that btrfs-progs in testing didn't break my vo
all my confs/zones: http://pastebin.com/z23HRyAh
the ONLY thing altered in the confs is the domain
1. You are missing a $ORIGIN line at the top of your zone file:
$ORIGIN dimitrisze.com.
(Don't forget the dot after "com"!)
That $ORIGIN is implied by bind from the
zone "dimitr
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Seems not many of us yet use btrfs, I therefore would like to ask if
> any users can signoff on the btrfs-progs in testing (i.e. verify that
> the package appears to work).
I use btrfs for 3 years now the last 2 is my root and h
I thought that it would be translated to my public ip... :P
A dig proved that I was wrong, I fixed it, but now I have to wait 2 hours
(TTL 7200) to update the zone?
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
(> <) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have c
Hi guys,
Seems not many of us yet use btrfs, I therefore would like to ask if
any users can signoff on the btrfs-progs in testing (i.e. verify that
the package appears to work).
In particular, I'm interested to hear if someone who uses btrfs-progs
and initscripts from testing could verify that th
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> is the IP 0.0.0.0 ok? or do I have to change it to the actual public IP
Why would you want to have 0.0.0.0 in DNS anyway? If you don't want to
have a "www" or "imap" or other subdomains, just delete them
completely... (
is the IP 0.0.0.0 ok? or do I have to change it to the actual public IP
(it's static, so it won't be a problem)
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
(> <) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Δημήτρης
thanks a million man...
yes, you're right, domains are public :P
didn't know about named-check*!
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
(> <) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrot
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to set up my own DNS server but I can't...
> I registered ns1.mydomain.com as a nameserver and I ponted it to my VPS's
> IP.
> the I listed ns1.mydomain.com as the nameserver of mydomain.com.
>
> I don't know
hello,
I'm trying to set up my own DNS server but I can't...
I registered ns1.mydomain.com as a nameserver and I ponted it to my VPS's
IP.
the I listed ns1.mydomain.com as the nameserver of mydomain.com.
I don't know if I've done something wrong with my registrar or my
zones/configs are wrong...
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski
wrote:
> As you probably know, fish release available in [community] is very old.
> Code hasn't been updated since 2009. Official website doesn't work
> currently, but there was the info that development is stalled.
>
> Alex Søndergaard sugge
On 27/07/12 15:45, Stephen E. Baker wrote:
> On 27/07/2012 9:29 AM, Mike wrote:
>> On 27/07/12 13:57, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>>> The 27/07/12, Mike wrote:
>>>
I'm aware of that, but that doesn't mean one can't fix them. Nobody
said, that the code base of sysvinit shouldn't be modified.
>
On Jul 27, 2012 3:57 PM, "Tom Gundersen" wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 27, 2012 3:25 PM, "Jameson" wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Myra Nelson
wrote:
> > > quickly adapt to these types of changes. Many don't seem to grasp the
> > > concept that both systems are still supported. In my case
On Jul 27, 2012 3:25 PM, "Jameson" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Myra Nelson
wrote:
> > quickly adapt to these types of changes. Many don't seem to grasp the
> > concept that both systems are still supported. In my case because of
> > my bull head and set ways, I still use the /etc/
On Jul 27, 2012 3:16 PM, "Kevin Chadwick" wrote:
>
> > > May be this is a silly question but: will there be a general
announcement
> > > when systemd became officially adopted?
> >
> > That would be announced, yes.
>
> As you have said the timescale for initscripts being replaced by
> systemd co
On 27/07/2012 9:29 AM, Mike wrote:
On 27/07/12 13:57, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 27/07/12, Mike wrote:
I'm aware of that, but that doesn't mean one can't fix them. Nobody
said, that the code base of sysvinit shouldn't be modified.
It would have been fixed for a long time if it were easy enou
On 27/07/12 13:57, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 27/07/12, Mike wrote:
>
>> I'm aware of that, but that doesn't mean one can't fix them. Nobody
>> said, that the code base of sysvinit shouldn't be modified.
> It would have been fixed for a long time if it were easy enough. :-)
>
Uhm there are init
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> quickly adapt to these types of changes. Many don't seem to grasp the
> concept that both systems are still supported. In my case because of
> my bull head and set ways, I still use the /etc/rc.d/network script
> for starting my network and let
> > May be this is a silly question but: will there be a general announcement
> > when systemd became officially adopted?
>
> That would be announced, yes.
As you have said the timescale for initscripts being replaced by
systemd comes down to the challenges of maintenance and I guess this
is
The 27/07/12, Mike wrote:
> I'm aware of that, but that doesn't mean one can't fix them. Nobody
> said, that the code base of sysvinit shouldn't be modified.
It would have been fixed for a long time if it were easy enough. :-)
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
The 23/07/12, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Ignoring systemctl output which is still less clear and slowed me down.
I don't agree.
> Show what daemons will be running if you were to boot a filesystem
> which isn't running and tell me it's as quick to work out on a systemd
> system.
http://fedoraproj
On 27/07/12 09:18, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 27/07/12, Mike wrote:
>
>> Instead of fixing such problems we need something new that's broken too?
> You have to know that fixing was tried more than once with various
> approaches along time. Parallelism is one of the best-known of these
> failed a
Hello,
I am new to archlinux, coming from gentoo, and have successful installed
the system so far.
Now I have the problem that when I start X by using startx or startxfce4
(I have only tried this two) I have no keyboard or mouse. I can solve
the problem by disconnecting and reconnecting mous
Oon-Ee Ng on Fri, 2012/07/27 11:33:
> Thanks to Morris and Christian (karol too, but rather not have an
> additional package). Can't seem to find a reference to this specific
> behaviour on the pacman manpage, unfortunately, but it'll simplify my
> script.
>
> Looks like there's no way not to hav
On Jul 27, 2012 6:21 AM, "Martin Cigorraga" wrote:
>
> May be this is a silly question but: will there be a general announcement
> when systemd became officially adopted?
That would be announced, yes.
> As T. G. said in the Dev list:
> "If a move should happen, I suggest waiting a bit longer unt
The 27/07/12, Mike wrote:
> Instead of fixing such problems we need something new that's broken too?
You have to know that fixing was tried more than once with various
approaches along time. Parallelism is one of the best-known of these
failed attempts. Smart logs, correct error reporting are oth
53 matches
Mail list logo
