On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 29/06/12 02:58, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>> I have a question about pacman's behaviour regarding packges to
>>> be updated.
>>>
>>> According to < $:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 29/06/12 16:01, martin kalcher wrote:
>> Am 29.06.2012 07:58, schrieb Allan McRae:
>>> On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
>
"Ignoring upgrade from perl-datetime-format-strptime from 1.51-1
to 1.5000-1"
No complain
On 29.06.2012 07:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
> The developer changed his numbering scheme after 1.5000
> to 1.51.
In that case you should add epoch=1 to the PKGBUILD.
--
Florian Pritz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 29/06/12 16:01, martin kalcher wrote:
> Am 29.06.2012 07:58, schrieb Allan McRae:
>> On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>> "Ignoring upgrade from perl-datetime-format-strptime from 1.51-1
>>> to 1.5000-1"
>>>
>>> No complaints as it's easy to fix, I was just wondering about the
>>> rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/06/12 02:58, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
>> I have a question about pacman's behaviour regarding packges to
>> be updated.
>>
>> According to < $: man pacman >
>>
>> You can also use pacman -Su to upgrade all pack
Am 29.06.2012 07:58, schrieb Allan McRae:
On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
I have a question about pacman's behaviour regarding packges to be updated.
According to < $: man pacman >
You can also use pacman -Su to upgrade all packages that are out of
date. See Sync Options below. When upgr
On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
> I have a question about pacman's behaviour regarding packges to be updated.
>
> According to < $: man pacman >
>
> You can also use pacman -Su to upgrade all packages that are out of
> date. See Sync Options below. When upgrading, pacman performs version
>
I have a question about pacman's behaviour regarding packges to be updated.
According to < $: man pacman >
You can also use pacman -Su to upgrade all packages that are out of
date. See Sync Options below. When upgrading, pacman performs version
comparison to determine which packages need upgradin
> No, it supports the vesa standard. All cards do. But that's completely
> different
> from vesafb, a linux driver.
Your right and you cleared up the confusion somewhbut that's a little
unfair. I believe all cards MUST support VESA. The vesafb driver isn't
supported directly but it uses the VESA
9 matches
Mail list logo
