Re: [arch-general] Pacman behaviour comparing numerical versions for package upgrades

[Florian Pritz]

On 29.06.2012 07:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
> The developer changed his numbering scheme after 1.5000
> to 1.51.

In that case you should add epoch=1 to the PKGBUILD.

-- 
Florian Pritz

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature