On 2012/6/27 Genes MailLists wrote:
> Update:
>
> After installing and getting errors - I re-installed all the texlive
> 2012 packages again - this time there are no errors - and now I can use
> texlive (it was totally broken before the second install).
>
> gene
I would have needed the lo
Hello,
** Rémy Oudompheng [2012-06-26 22:10:11 +0200]:
[I don't have permission to post on arch-dev- ML, so I reply to general
hoping that Rémy will see it]
> Hello,
> I am going to put Texlive 2012 packages in [testing]. Texlive 2012 is
> not yet released, but it is frozen, so I do not expect c
Update:
After installing and getting errors - I re-installed all the texlive
2012 packages again - this time there are no errors - and now I can use
texlive (it was totally broken before the second install).
gene
On 06/26/2012 04:10 PM, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
...
Please try them and complain on mailing lists. Don't hesitate to
compile your own theses, memoirs or books.
Getting several errors some similar to others some different
gene/
===
recreating all formats...Error: `pdftex -ini -jobnam
All, (kaiting),
Does anyone have server space available to host Trinity binaries for Arch for
testing? Currently the size requirements for TDE binaries is ~270 Meg per
architecture (~540 M for both i686 & x86_64). The package list currently
building on Arch is here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/i
On 06/26/12 at 09:19pm, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> If it wasn't huge before then you were either running nouveau or vesa
> framebuffer on the console and Nvidia in the desktop. This warning is
> likely due to the fact that running a framebuffer and Nvidia used to
> crash linux. It can probably? be ign
On 06/26/2012 01:19 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Putting GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX=text in my default grub, then running a
new grub.cfg. Reboot and the message went away, though in the console
the text is huge. I have seen no actual "fix" for this and have read
that Nvidia is not even sure how or why it
Hi,
for bloom-facebook package I need to ensure a dependency that runs java applets
and WebStart.
This is provided by icedtea-web-java7 (for openjdk7), icedtea-web (openjdk6)
and probably part of JRE (Oracle/Sun Java).
Could there be some provides say 'java-webstart' for these packages so I
> Putting GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX=text in my default grub, then running a
> new grub.cfg. Reboot and the message went away, though in the console
> the text is huge. I have seen no actual "fix" for this and have read
> that Nvidia is not even sure how or why it broke.
If it wasn't huge before the
Hello,
I am going to put Texlive 2012 packages in [testing]. Texlive 2012 is
not yet released, but it is frozen, so I do not expect changes to
these packages except to fix packaging errors.
Please try them and complain on mailing lists. Don't hesitate to
compile your own theses, memoirs or books.
On 06/26/2012 09:42 PM, Don deJuan wrote:
On 06/26/2012 12:31 PM, Arno Gaboury wrote:
dear list,
After a few months of running Arch, I am now fine tuning everything (or
at least trying).
I discovered this error message in *kernel.log* file.
NVRM: Your system is not currently configured to
On 06/26/2012 12:31 PM, Arno Gaboury wrote:
dear list,
After a few months of running Arch, I am now fine tuning everything (or
at least trying).
I discovered this error message in *kernel.log* file.
NVRM: Your system is not currently configured to drive a VGA console
NVRM: on the primary
dear list,
After a few months of running Arch, I am now fine tuning everything (or
at least trying).
I discovered this error message in *kernel.log* file.
NVRM: Your system is not currently configured to drive a VGA console
NVRM: on the primary VGA device. The NVIDIA Linux graphics driver
On 06/26/2012 10:49 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Have you considered flavours like mail, web.
A recent thread showed atleast one person who probably would have liked
an out of the box web arch?
Sorry Kevin, I don't follow you.
probably because it's completely off the radar and probably proj
> >
> >
> > Have you considered flavours like mail, web.
> >
> > A recent thread showed atleast one person who probably would have liked
> > an out of the box web arch?
> >
> >
> Sorry Kevin, I don't follow you.
probably because it's completely off the radar and probably projects
in themselves
>
>
> Have you considered flavours like mail, web.
>
> A recent thread showed atleast one person who probably would have liked
> an out of the box web arch?
>
>
Sorry Kevin, I don't follow you.
--
-msx
Hey folks
A few days ago i was trying to burn an iso to a dual layer dvd, but i
got an i/o error. Thankfully though the burn failed, but it spared the
disc :)
I tried downgrading cdrtools but that didn't fix it either. I found out
that the iso was about 4200 MB in size and apparently trying to bu
> Ensuring users can add keys and allowing multiboot and reasonably easy
> usage of livecds without disabling secureboot all together should be
> the current campaign.
And openbios installation. I wonder if Dell will only allow Dell
Windows?
--
___
Having looked again at the fsfs campaign.
We, the undersigned, urge all computer makers implementing UEFI's
so-called "Secure Boot" to do it in a way that allows free software
operating systems to be installed. To respect user freedom and truly
protect user security, manufacturers must either al
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 15:02 -0700, Don deJuan wrote:
> The border is the rules of the board you're posting to. If you don't
> like them, start your own board. But again this is an Arch board and
> your points and rambles do nothing to solve, help or further educate
> people about Secure Boot, le
Guys,
Attempting to update an arch chroot (only a couple days old), I have run into
the following error:
sudo mkarchroot -u $CHROOT/root
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
local is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade..
> idea of having a server edition of AL ready to deploy and forgot about it
> because Arch rocks
Have you considered flavours like mail, web.
A recent thread showed atleast one person who probably would have liked
an out of the box web arch?
--
_
> I understand that given Microsoft's record in the past, some of you are
> worried, but when looking in the specifications (as Thomas already
> pointed out) it is quite clear that Microsoft wants to do the right
> thing here.
>
> Personally I couldn't come up with a better way/infrastructure than
Dear list,
I boot in runlevel 3, *Kernel 3.4.4-2*. When I am at the login prompt, I
can see this:
magnolia login [ here is a number] NOHZ= *local_softirq_pending 08*.
Pressing Enter give me back the login prompt, and then I can log and startx.
I find this message in my *var/log/kernel.log* f
I'm has used the archlinux in all. My servers are running firewall, web,
bd, proxy, DNS, dhcp and others. I'm used politics of update/upgrade, and
mark some packages to not update/upgrade. I'm used only the oficial mirror
in the pacman. I'm removed compilers and run hardenings.
On Jun 26, 2012 9:31
Hi guys, may be you'll find ArchServer an interesting project, you'll find
more here:
www.archserver.org.
The idea behind this project is to create a rock-solid,
server-oriented Arch flavor ready for
mass deployment with all the pros we love about Arch -easy to maintain,
lightweight,
ultra-stable,
And remember one day when the "Disable Secure Boot" button is not present.
Well we have right to not allow that too.
2012/6/26 Lars Madson
> Karol ... don't ever accept the unacceptable because it's shaped as the
> best proposition ever. Make your own. Microsoft should not ask people to
> pay an
Karol ... don't ever accept the unacceptable because it's shaped as the
best proposition ever. Make your own. Microsoft should not ask people to
pay anything for a technology they impose, the new economy is about giving
what you produce, I guess we'll receive a lot and lower down the quantity
of sh
Hi,
Am 26.06.2012 04:29, schrieb Manolo Martínez:
> Just for clarification: you seem to be endorsing a model in which
> organizations (linux distros?) pay Microsoft for the right to install
> non-Microsoft software in PCs. Is that correct?
Yeah, I see that this creeps the shit out of some of you.
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 10:28 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 22:29 -0400, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> > On 06/26/12 at 12:55am, Karol Babioch wrote:
> > > I have only the following criticism: Given the relatively low cost of
> > > getting a signed certificate from Microsoft (to my kn
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 22:29 -0400, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> On 06/26/12 at 12:55am, Karol Babioch wrote:
> > I have only the following criticism: Given the relatively low cost of
> > getting a signed certificate from Microsoft (to my knowledge it will
> > cost about 100 USD), it might fail to achie
31 matches
Mail list logo
