Re: [arch-general] Why was /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel dropped from cups?

2012-06-08 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/08/2012 07:06 PM, martin kalcher wrote: > I dont have this problem: > > LC_ALL=C pacman -Qo /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel > /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel is owned by cups-filters 1.0.18-2 > > Try reinstalling cups-filters. I did - it worked. The only thing I can figure that happened w

Re: [arch-general] Why was /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel dropped from cups?

2012-06-08 Thread martin kalcher
Am 09.06.2012 01:35, schrieb David C. Rankin: On 06/08/2012 06:28 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: Guys, After updates to cups yesterday, printing to a laserjet4 stopped working. After searching, I discovered /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel did not exist. Why was it removed from cups PKGBUILD? The

Re: [arch-general] Why was /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel dropped from cups?

2012-06-08 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/08/2012 06:28 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Guys, > > After updates to cups yesterday, printing to a laserjet4 stopped working. > After searching, I discovered /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel did not exist. > Why > was it removed from cups PKGBUILD? The size is minimal in the days of gigaby

[arch-general] Why was /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel dropped from cups?

2012-06-08 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, After updates to cups yesterday, printing to a laserjet4 stopped working. After searching, I discovered /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel did not exist. Why was it removed from cups PKGBUILD? The size is minimal in the days of gigabyte drives and there are still many parallel and serial print

Re: [arch-general] Do packages built on libusb need rebuilding on libusbx? upsd won't stay connected over usb.

2012-06-08 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/08/2012 03:13 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Guys, > > Update yesterday caused network-ups-tools to fail (upsd). I have 2 x86_64 > servers running upsd. The one I did not update continues to work, but the one > I > updated yesterday does not. So I have a working install to compare to. The >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] linux 3.4.1 ready for [core]?

2012-06-08 Thread Ike Devolder
Op vrijdag 8 juni 2012 23:29:49 schreef u: > Op vrijdag 8 juni 2012 15:32:19 schreef Dan McGee: > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Tobias Powalowski > > > > wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > signoffs are done, anything that stops us from moving to new kernel > > > series? > > > > Do we just blindly f

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] linux 3.4.1 ready for [core]?

2012-06-08 Thread Ike Devolder
Op vrijdag 8 juni 2012 15:32:19 schreef Dan McGee: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Tobias Powalowski > > wrote: > > Hi guys, > > signoffs are done, anything that stops us from moving to new kernel > > series? > > Do we just blindly follow the signoffs page, or do we actually notice > people ha

Re: [arch-general] Location of sample websites

2012-06-08 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 08.06.2012 22:59, schrieb Jayesh Badwaik: > Hi, > > I am using wordpress and I found that the sample wordpress site is > installed in the /srv/http location. I find it convenient that all such > sample/getting started things should be actually installed someplace > like /usr/share/wordpress

[arch-general] Location of sample websites

2012-06-08 Thread Jayesh Badwaik
Hi, I am using wordpress and I found that the sample wordpress site is installed in the /srv/http location. I find it convenient that all such sample/getting started things should be actually installed someplace like /usr/share/wordpress/ and then anyone who wants to use the site can copy pas

[arch-general] Do packages built on libusb need rebuilding on libusbx? upsd won't stay connected over usb.

2012-06-08 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, Update yesterday caused network-ups-tools to fail (upsd). I have 2 x86_64 servers running upsd. The one I did not update continues to work, but the one I updated yesterday does not. So I have a working install to compare to. The install that fails -- starts just fine, but then loses communi

Re: [arch-general] Dovecot problem after update today

2012-06-08 Thread mike cloaked
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Yclept Nemo wrote: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30181 > > Non-breaking space, 0x00a0 needs to be replaced with actual space, 0x0020 The problem I had is fixed in version dovecot 2.1.7-4 Fast and fabulous! -- mike c

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] x264 and ffmpeg rebuild

2012-06-08 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 07/06/12 21:36, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Ionut Biru wrote: >> On 06/03/2012 06:52 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just pushed in staging new updates for this two packages. We are doing >>> this two in the same time. >>> >>> >> >> bump. >> >> there are still

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.8-1

2012-06-08 Thread Sudaraka Wijesinghe
On 06/08/12 08:21, gt wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 08:08:43PM +0530, Sudaraka Wijesinghe wrote: >> On 06/07/12 19:52, gt wrote: >>> >>> I am getting the following error: >>> >>> linux-headers-3.3.8-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz: invalid or corrupted package (PGP >>> signature) >> >> I believe you need to

Re: [arch-general] Dovecot problem after update today

2012-06-08 Thread mike cloaked
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Yclept Nemo wrote: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30181 > > Non-breaking space, 0x00a0 needs to be replaced with actual space, 0x0020 Thanks for the link - I'll follow the bug. -- mike c