-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/2012 06:29 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> I think rather than split packaging, we just drop the .protocol files from
> tdesdk and make tdesvn a dependency of tdesdk. The tdesvn package is only 1.8M
> so it's not a lot of overhead for someone who
On 03/25/2012 07:29 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/2012 05:01 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
You may have a bigger problem then, you may/will have to put them into
unrelated directories so they do not conflict with each other.
I originally thought you
what drivers are you actually using for X?
if it is nvidia, then just remove all the xf86-video drivers (pacman
-Qqs xf86-video|sudo pacman -Rns -)
otherwise, you should still remove those extra ones any way...
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 06:35:57PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> On upd
Guys,
On update today of an i686 box, I get the following unresolved error with
pacman -Syu:
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: ati-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: intel-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: mach64-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: mga-dri: requires libg
Am Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:02:33 -0400
schrieb Baho Utot :
> You stiil had/have a workable solution though
But you don't mean this "solution"?
pkgbase="splittest"
pkgname="splittest"
true && pkgname=('splittest' 'splittest-foo')
This doesn't really work as already explained once on aur-general and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/2012 05:01 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> You may have a bigger problem then, you may/will have to put them into
> unrelated directories so they do not conflict with each other.
>
> I originally thought you could sed this thing but I don't think tha
On 03/25/2012 01:24 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 03/25/2012 06:55 AM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
On 03/24/2012 10:44 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I need to know if makepkg/PKGBUILD can handle a check to see whether the same
files provided by two different packages (which are not dependencie
On 03/25/2012 02:00 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/2012 12:30 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote:
In tdesdk's PKGBUILD do somthing like this
build () {
pach -Np -i patches
sed 's|clause|fix|' file.c
.configure --prefix
}
package_tdesdk ()
{
make i
On 03/25/2012 04:09 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:08:43 +0200
schrieb Heiko Baums:
AUR still doesn't support split packages, and split packages can't be
handled by the AUR wrappers. So this is really the worst ideas for
AUR, and should only be used for binary repos for now.
The
Le 25 mars 2012 21:33, Hans-J. Schmid a écrit :
> Dear Rémy,
>
> thanks a lot for supporting Archlinux and your brilliant work on maintaining
> all these packages.
>
> I am having a quick question. I am just writing a CV and use the moderncv
> package ( http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex
Have you tried manually adding it in grub.cfg BTW?
On 3/25/12, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> With the latest Grub2 (grub2-efi-x86_64 1:2.00beta2-2), it seems that grub-
> mkconfig is not picking up my fallback initramfs any more, so there's no
> fallback option in the boot menu. Has anyone else expe
Am Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:08:43 +0200
schrieb Heiko Baums :
> AUR still doesn't support split packages, and split packages can't be
> handled by the AUR wrappers. So this is really the worst ideas for
> AUR, and should only be used for binary repos for now.
>
> The better way is to create three sing
Am Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:30:52 +0300
schrieb Jesse Juhani Jaara :
> su, 2012-03-25 kello 12:24 -0500, David C. Rankin kirjoitti:
> > Is there a go-by PKGBUILD that anyone can think of that does just
> > that?
>
> In tdesdk's PKGBUILD do somthing like this
> build () {
> pach -Np -i patches
> sed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/2012 12:30 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote:
> In tdesdk's PKGBUILD do somthing like this
> build () {
> pach -Np -i patches
> sed 's|clause|fix|' file.c
> .configure --prefix
> }
>
> package_tdesdk ()
> {
> make install
> rm "$pkgdir/opt/trinit
su, 2012-03-25 kello 12:24 -0500, David C. Rankin kirjoitti:
> Is there a go-by PKGBUILD that anyone can think of that does just that?
In tdesdk's PKGBUILD do somthing like this
build () {
pach -Np -i patches
sed 's|clause|fix|' file.c
.configure --prefix
}
package_tdesdk ()
{
make install
rm
On 03/25/2012 06:55 AM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> On 03/24/2012 10:44 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> I need to know if makepkg/PKGBUILD can handle a check to see whether the
>> same
>> files provided by two different packages (which are not dependencies of each
>> other) exist in the fi
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 08:57:48AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I've now cleared it off, but what had happened was a download of an iso
> with a torrent file and afterwards the iso had a unique inode it couldn't
> be checked with md5sum because md5sum claimed it didn't exist. I didn't
> even t
On 25 March 2012 14:57, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> six aria2c for good measure. The original bittorrent is no better and in
> many ways worse so if I do anything with that type of download again I'll
> either have to find me a 3rd linux alternative that can run from the
> command line or just use fre
I've now cleared it off, but what had happened was a download of an iso
with a torrent file and afterwards the iso had a unique inode it couldn't
be checked with md5sum because md5sum claimed it didn't exist. I didn't
even try it with the asc file since md5sum didn't work. Also the file
comma
On 03/24/2012 10:44 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I need to know if makepkg/PKGBUILD can handle a check to see whether the
> same
> files provided by two different packages (which are not dependencies of each
> other) exist in the file system to prevent an installation failure due to
>
On 03/25/2012 12:44 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I need to know if makepkg/PKGBUILD can handle a check to see whether the same
files provided by two different packages (which are not dependencies of each
other) exist in the file system to prevent an installation failure due to
conflicting
Am 24.03.2012 09:45, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> Hi guys,
> please signoff 3.2.13 series for both arches.
> package is not in testing, please grab it from here:
> http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/
>
> This will move to [core] directly, because 3.3 is in [testing].
>
> greetings
> tpowa
anyone
22 matches
Mail list logo
