On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 23:23 -0500, Conner Lee wrote:
> You could ask the package maintainer of he would be willing to maintain a
> virtualbox-modules-lts package.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=archlinux+virtualbox
The first hit is the Wiki, it works without any disagreeableness:
https://wiki.archlinux.org
You could ask the package maintainer of he would be willing to maintain a
virtualbox-modules-lts package.
Check this out.
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Moving_your_profile_to_another_computer
2012/3/11 Genes MailLists :
> On 03/10/2012 09:10 PM, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
>> Is there any compile flag or something I could alter? I think that
>> would be easy to do. I just want to clean my home folder, backup
>> firefox and thunderbird data. I only want to backup a .mozilla
>> directory a
On 03/10/2012 09:10 PM, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
> Is there any compile flag or something I could alter? I think that
> would be easy to do. I just want to clean my home folder, backup
> firefox and thunderbird data. I only want to backup a .mozilla
> directory and not .mozilla and .thunderbird t
Is there any compile flag or something I could alter? I think that
would be easy to do. I just want to clean my home folder, backup
firefox and thunderbird data. I only want to backup a .mozilla
directory and not .mozilla and .thunderbird them two.
So,anyone knows?
Besides, I don't want to symlin
Hey,
You can install them from source, but there are existing tools to do so.
Install the virtualbox-source package, then run "vboxbuild" as root to
build the modules. They can then be loaded with "modprobe vboxdrv"
Thanks,
Jarek Sedlacek
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 7:19 PM, David Rosenstrauch wr
I see there's a virtualbox-modules package, but that's for the mainline
(3.2 series) kernel. I don't see a similar package for the LTS (3.0
series) kernel. Does one exist somewhere that I'm missing it? If not,
how does one use virtualbox on Arch with the LTS kernel? Do we need to
build the kern
On 11/03/12 02:12, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:42:15 +0100
> Florian Pritz wrote:
>
>> You should read pacman.conf(5) "PACKAGE AND DATABASE SIGNATURE CHECKING"
>> and use "Optional PackageRequired"
>
> Quick question and I'm guessing the answer will be just to wait and
> that's
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:42:15 +0100
Florian Pritz wrote:
> You should read pacman.conf(5) "PACKAGE AND DATABASE SIGNATURE CHECKING"
> and use "Optional PackageRequired"
Quick question and I'm guessing the answer will be just to wait and
that's fine.
There are just a few packages preventing me fro
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:34:45 +0200
Thanasis Georgiou wrote:
> I was forced
> to dual-boot windows for 1 whole year until I finally made a TV tuner
> work in linux.
>
> --
> Thanasis Georgiou
as a matter of interest what was the TV card you could not get working
under linux as i have one i would
OT:
Another reply, just to correct a misunderstanding.
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 15:24 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> There are a lot of ice1712 (envy24) audio cards from the simplest ones
> like M-Audio Audiophile 24/96 up to the most professional ones like
> the RME Hammerfall which are totally not su
Am Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:35:07 +0200
schrieb Thanasis Georgiou :
> No it's not.
Sorry, but it is.
> The developers decided they want it a part of their
> desktop environment and now it's a dependency.
And that's the problem and the reason, why those flame wars regularly
pop up if PA is mentioned.
I can assume that 'Please enter summary' text was included in the bug
report template to remind people they should enter a summary of the
bug they're reporting and not just "tag" it with e.g. '[arptables]'. I
don't know when exactly was this introduced, but in the past month
I've noticed several bu
> On Mar 10, 2012 2:34 AM, "Ralf Mardorf"
wrote:
> At the beginning I only wanted to help, I didn't start that discussion
> about PA for this thread, other people did start it.
>
> I hope we can stop it, thanx
I can see your points and they are perfectly valid. I know how it feels to
have hardware
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 10:35 +0200, Thanasis Georgiou wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2012 2:34 AM, "Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
> > Some people, not only deaf people, don't need audio with or without PA,
> > it's abstruse making it a dependency.
> No it's not. The developers decided they want it a part of their desk
On Mar 10, 2012 2:34 AM, "Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
> Some people, not only deaf people, don't need audio with or without PA,
> it's abstruse making it a dependency.
No it's not. The developers decided they want it a part of their desktop
environment and now it's a dependency. You obviously have proble
17 matches
Mail list logo
