Re: [arch-general] dovecot.conf moved to dovecot.pacsave - why?

2012-02-27 Thread Genes MailLists
On 02/27/2012 06:51 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > All, > > Why does the new dovecot package move the dovecot.conf to > dovecot.conf.pacsave? The same 2.0 configuration works with 2.1, why leave the > user without any dovecot.conf at all? > For me when I updated to dovecot 2.1.1-3 it was even

Re: [arch-general] dovecot.conf moved to dovecot.pacsave - why?

2012-02-27 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:34 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: >  That's fine and I agree. But, if we are not going to install the sample > config, why does that mean we have to move the existing dovecot.conf to > dovecot.conf.pacsave and leave the user without any config on existing > installs? > >  M

Re: [arch-general] dovecot.conf moved to dovecot.pacsave - why?

2012-02-27 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/27/2012 07:30 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:51 AM, David C. Rankin > wrote: >> Why does the new dovecot package move the dovecot.conf to >> dovecot.conf.pacsave? The same 2.0 configuration works with 2.1, why leave >> the >> user without any dovecot.conf at all? >

Re: [arch-general] dovecot.conf moved to dovecot.pacsave - why?

2012-02-27 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: >  Why does the new dovecot package move the dovecot.conf to > dovecot.conf.pacsave? The same 2.0 configuration works with 2.1, why leave the > user without any dovecot.conf at all? If you wonder why a packaging change was made, the first p

Re: [arch-general] moving away from gnome

2012-02-27 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/25/2012 01:24 PM, Andrea Crotti wrote: > But another thing, is there a way to find out what command is exactly run > when pressing things in the gnome-panel? > (For example when I launch suspend from the gnome-panel, what is it executed?) catching a suspend command might be difficult, but fo

Re: [arch-general] dovecot.conf moved to dovecot.pacsave - why?

2012-02-27 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/27/2012 06:18 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > Was just coming here to ask similar. As far as I can understand, this > is so the user can use their own (unaffected by upgrades) > dovecot.conf, but we have /etc/dovecot/local.conf which is by default > enabled in the stock dovecot.conf anyway for that.

Re: [arch-general] dovecot.conf moved to dovecot.pacsave - why?

2012-02-27 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > All, > >  Why does the new dovecot package move the dovecot.conf to > dovecot.conf.pacsave? The same 2.0 configuration works with 2.1, why leave the > user without any dovecot.conf at all? > > [2012-02-27 15:17] warning: /etc/ssl/dovecot-op

Re: [arch-general] tab completion is mucking up prompt spacing - started a week or so ago - any ideas?

2012-02-27 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/23/2012 06:38 AM, Martti Kühne wrote: > Hi > > After I last saw things like that I pacman -R bash-completion. haven't had any > trouble since. Try getting rid of it, too, simple file names will still be > tab- > completed. > > cheers! > mar77i That worked, thanks. Looks like bash-completi

[arch-general] dovecot.conf moved to dovecot.pacsave - why?

2012-02-27 Thread David C. Rankin
All, Why does the new dovecot package move the dovecot.conf to dovecot.conf.pacsave? The same 2.0 configuration works with 2.1, why leave the user without any dovecot.conf at all? [2012-02-27 15:17] warning: /etc/ssl/dovecot-openssl.cnf saved as /etc/ssl/dovecot-openssl.cnf.pacsave [2012-02-27

Re: [arch-general] moving away from gnome

2012-02-27 Thread Thiago Coutinho
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Calvin Morrison wrote: > On 26 February 2012 11:56, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: >> There is slim which only depends on gtk2 (mayby some other minor libs >> needed >> by anyother gtk app too) and cdm which is a conole mode login manager :D > > I suggest you just use

Re: [arch-general] Need translations for small project

2012-02-27 Thread martin kalcher
Am 27.02.2012 11:45, schrieb Alfredo Palhares: Hello, Sweet project, i am making something like your local repo in lua, but mine will have some build options and keep a clean PKGBUILD dir by warping makepkg with my LuaBash[1] library Good luck with yours, but i think having langueges on this t

Re: [arch-general] moving away from gnome

2012-02-27 Thread Calvin Morrison
On 26 February 2012 11:56, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > sunnuntai, 26. helmikuuta 2012 16:39:31 Andrea Crotti kirjoitti: > > Is kdm in kde-workspace-base? > Yeh it is. kdebase-workspace is the correct name of the pkg tought > > If yes it also has quite a lot of dependencies which I don't really ne

Re: [arch-general] ruby 1.9.3_p125-1 in [extra]

2012-02-27 Thread Cédric Girard
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > As a result of the above change, all ruby gem packages will have to > add a --no-user-install flag when running gem in the PKGBUILD. > PKGBUILD proto should be updated then. I have opened a bug report: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/2868

Re: [arch-general] Need translations for small project

2012-02-27 Thread martin kalcher
Am 27.02.2012 11:17, schrieb Axilleas P: On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Frikilinuxwrote: On Dom 26 Feb 2012 17:29:34 martin kalcher escribió: Am 26.02.2012 17:13, schrieb rafael ff1: 2012/2/26 martin kalcher: Am 26.02.2012 16:58, schrieb Jesse Juhani Jaara: sunnuntai, 26. helmikuuta 2012

Re: [arch-general] Need translations for small project

2012-02-27 Thread Alfredo Palhares
Hello, Sweet project, i am making something like your local repo in lua, but mine will have some build options and keep a clean PKGBUILD dir by warping makepkg with my LuaBash[1] library Good luck with yours, but i think having langueges on this type of app is unecessary, since is almost ce

Re: [arch-general] keyboard problem

2012-02-27 Thread Andrea Crotti
On 02/27/2012 10:36 AM, Jason Steadman wrote: On 27 February 2012 10:34, Andrea Crotti wrote: I'm trying to remove Gnome from another machine, but here starting Xorg with startx gives the following error: (EE) Microsoft Natural® Ergonomic Keyboard 4000: failed to initialize for relative axes.

Re: [arch-general] keyboard problem

2012-02-27 Thread Jason Steadman
On 27 February 2012 10:34, Andrea Crotti wrote: > I'm trying to remove Gnome from another machine, but here starting Xorg > with startx gives > the following error: > > (EE) Microsoft Natural® Ergonomic Keyboard 4000: failed to initialize for > relative axes. > > > While GDM works perfectly fine.

[arch-general] keyboard problem

2012-02-27 Thread Andrea Crotti
I'm trying to remove Gnome from another machine, but here starting Xorg with startx gives the following error: (EE) Microsoft Natural® Ergonomic Keyboard 4000: failed to initialize for relative axes. While GDM works perfectly fine. How can it make a difference? And where should be the driver

Re: [arch-general] Need translations for small project

2012-02-27 Thread Axilleas P
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Frikilinux wrote: > On Dom 26 Feb 2012 17:29:34 martin kalcher escribió: > > Am 26.02.2012 17:13, schrieb rafael ff1: > > > 2012/2/26 martin kalcher: > > >> Am 26.02.2012 16:58, schrieb Jesse Juhani Jaara: > > >>> sunnuntai, 26. helmikuuta 2012 12:55:51 rafael ff1

Re: [arch-general] ruby 1.9.3_p125-1 in [extra]

2012-02-27 Thread Paul Gideon Dann
On Sunday 26 Feb 2012 17:44:51 Jan Steffens wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > >> On Saturday 25 Feb 2012 14:04:03 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > >>> If you run sudo gem install foo, it will install to /root/.

Re: [arch-general] Need translations for small project

2012-02-27 Thread Frikilinux
On Dom 26 Feb 2012 17:29:34 martin kalcher escribió: > Am 26.02.2012 17:13, schrieb rafael ff1: > > 2012/2/26 martin kalcher: > >> Am 26.02.2012 16:58, schrieb Jesse Juhani Jaara: > >>> sunnuntai, 26. helmikuuta 2012 12:55:51 rafael ff1 kirjoitti: > Suggestion: you could provide translations s