On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:51 AM, David C. Rankin <drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote: > Why does the new dovecot package move the dovecot.conf to > dovecot.conf.pacsave? The same 2.0 configuration works with 2.1, why leave the > user without any dovecot.conf at all?
If you wonder why a packaging change was made, the first place to look is in the changelogs: <http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/dovecot>. >From there you should hopefully find your answers :-) HTH, Tom