On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:51 AM, David C. Rankin
<drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
>  Why does the new dovecot package move the dovecot.conf to
> dovecot.conf.pacsave? The same 2.0 configuration works with 2.1, why leave the
> user without any dovecot.conf at all?

If you wonder why a packaging change was made, the first place to look
is in the changelogs:
<http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/dovecot>.

>From there you should hopefully find your answers :-)

HTH,

Tom

Reply via email to