Re: [arch-general] Beep no longer works

On 02/08/2012 01:18 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: Could not open /dev/tty0 or /dev/vc/0 for writing > open: No such file or director It's because beep is not installed with the suid bit set. Do |sudo chmod 4755 /usr/bin/beep https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=117309 |

Re: [arch-general] Phonon backends not loading

Hi, > WARNING: bool Phonon::FactoryPrivate::createBackend() phonon backend plugin > could not be loaded > WARNING: Phonon::createPath: Cannot connect Phonon::MediaObject ( no > objectName ) to Phonon::AudioOutput ( no objectName ). Could be this bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27850 -Bjør

Re: [arch-general] Beep no longer works

On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 05:18:03AM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban > wrote: > > #beep > > Could not open /dev/tty0 or /dev/vc/0 for writing > > open: No such file or director > > [...] > You need root / sudo. Works here. Well looking a

Re: [arch-general] Beep no longer works

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote: > #beep > Could not open /dev/tty0 or /dev/vc/0 for writing > open: No such file or director > > beep 1.3-2 > > Before update beep was working ok. You need root / sudo. Works here.

[arch-general] Beep no longer works

#beep Could not open /dev/tty0 or /dev/vc/0 for writing open: No such file or director beep 1.3-2 Before update beep was working ok.

[arch-general] Debugging a kde app

Caveat: I know this is probably an upstream bug so I'm just looking for some general info. This is my first try at debugging. I'm using the wiki articles for my guidance. I some questions about debugging a KDE app, kshisen which is included in the kdeames package. The best I can describe the behav

Re: [arch-general] backing up a blackberry phone (solved)

On Tuesday 07 Feb 2012 21:58:38 P Nikolic wrote: > On Tuesday 07 Feb 2012 16:45:52 Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > > On 02/07/2012 04:31 PM, P Nikolic wrote: > > > Hi .. > > > > > > I have a Balckberry Curve i could do with backing up again on suse i > > > used to use BarryBackup has anyone provided

Re: [arch-general] backing up a blackberry phone

On Tuesday 07 Feb 2012 16:45:52 Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > On 02/07/2012 04:31 PM, P Nikolic wrote: > > Hi .. > > > > I have a Balckberry Curve i could do with backing up again on suse i > > used to use BarryBackup has anyone provided this for Arch or what do > > people use to backup their Bal

Re: [arch-general] backing up a blackberry phone

On 02/07/2012 04:31 PM, P Nikolic wrote: Hi .. I have a Balckberry Curve i could do with backing up again on suse i used to use BarryBackup has anyone provided this for Arch or what do people use to backup their Balckberrys .. Cheers Pete . Search AUR. If it isn't in AUR, then likely

[arch-general] backing up a blackberry phone

Hi .. I have a Balckberry Curve i could do with backing up again on suse i used to use BarryBackup has anyone provided this for Arch or what do people use to backup their Balckberrys .. Cheers Pete . -- Linux 7-of-9 3.2.4-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Feb 4 10:53:01 CET 2012 x86_64 AMD

Re: [arch-general] Can't rebuild audiofile 3.2 from PKGBUILD?

On 02/07/2012 10:53 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > tiistai, 7. helmikuuta 2012 14:48:23 David C. Rankin kirjoitti: > >> /usr/bin/ld: power.o: undefined reference to symbol 'log10@@GLIBC_2.0' >> /usr/bin/ld: note: 'log10@@GLIBC_2.0' is defined in DSO /lib/libm.so.6 so >> try adding it to the linke

Re: [arch-general] Can't rebuild audiofile 3.2 from PKGBUILD?

On 02/07/2012 02:53 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: These probles can be solved by adding -lm to static Makefile or LIBS="-lm" ./configure -blah -blah -blah Thank you! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Re: [arch-general] Can't rebuild audiofile 3.2 from PKGBUILD?

tiistai, 7. helmikuuta 2012 14:48:23 David C. Rankin kirjoitti: > /usr/bin/ld: power.o: undefined reference to symbol 'log10@@GLIBC_2.0' > /usr/bin/ld: note: 'log10@@GLIBC_2.0' is defined in DSO /lib/libm.so.6 so > try adding it to the linker command line These probles can be solved by adding -lm

[arch-general] Can't rebuild audiofile 3.2 from PKGBUILD?

Guys, I have almost survived the updates from today, but the last issue I have is audiofile 3.2->3.3 kills sound in trinity and kills basket-notepads. I am trying to rebuild from the 3.2 pkgbuild, but the build fails: /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -std=gnu99 -march=i686 -m

Re: [arch-general] libpng 14/15 - anyway to workaround by having parallel installs?

2012/2/7 David C. Rankin > On 02/07/2012 01:12 PM, fredbezies wrote: > >> Have you tried >> e.g.https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=56248 >>> > >>> >> >> Thanks guys for talking about the PKGBUILD I made based on the libpng 1.4 >> when it

Re: [arch-general] libpng 14/15 - anyway to workaround by having parallel installs?

On 02/07/2012 01:12 PM, fredbezies wrote: Have you tried e.g.https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56248 > Thanks guys for talking about the PKGBUILD I made based on the libpng 1.4 when it was the stable version :) Thanks to all! I just grabbed it from AUR and built it. Smart move on putt

Re: [arch-general] libpng 14/15 - anyway to workaround by having parallel installs?

2012/2/7 Karol Blazewicz > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:06 PM, David C. Rankin > wrote: > > Guys, > > > > The libpng issue breaks nearly all of trinity. Is there a way to work > > around the libpng 1.5 update by having both 1.5 and 1.4 installed or with > > softlinks until all the rebuilds can be d

Re: [arch-general] libpng 14/15 - anyway to workaround by having parallel installs?

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:06 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Guys, > >  The libpng issue breaks nearly all of trinity. Is there a way to work > around the libpng 1.5 update by having both 1.5 and 1.4 installed or with > softlinks until all the rebuilds can be done? I'll play with it, but if > anyone k

Re: [arch-general] libpng 14/15 - anyway to workaround by having parallel installs?

2012/2/7 David C. Rankin > Guys, > > The libpng issue breaks nearly all of trinity. Is there a way to work > around the libpng 1.5 update by having both 1.5 and 1.4 installed or with > softlinks until all the rebuilds can be done? I'll play with it, but if > anyone knows how to approach this wor

Re: [arch-general] libpng 14/15 - anyway to workaround by having parallel installs?

On 02/07/12 at 01:06pm, David C. Rankin wrote: > The libpng issue breaks nearly all of trinity. Is there a way to > work around the libpng 1.5 update by having both 1.5 and 1.4 > installed or with softlinks until all the rebuilds can be done? I'll > play with it, but if anyone knows how to approa

[arch-general] libpng 14/15 - anyway to workaround by having parallel installs?

Guys, The libpng issue breaks nearly all of trinity. Is there a way to work around the libpng 1.5 update by having both 1.5 and 1.4 installed or with softlinks until all the rebuilds can be done? I'll play with it, but if anyone knows how to approach this workaround (if possible), I would we

Re: [arch-general] [SOLVED] help building aoe block driver against kernel 3.2.4

On 7 February 2012 20:50, Chuck Remes wrote: > I needed to add another include to aoeblk.c (and another C file when I got a > similar error). > > #include > > Apparently that is a new requirement as of the 3.x kernel series? Anyway, > looks like it is compiling correctly now. Hopefully it works

Re: [arch-general] [SOLVED] help building aoe block driver against kernel 3.2.4

On Feb 7, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Chuck Remes wrote: > Like the subject says, I need a hand building the latest aoe block driver > (available here [1]). The built-in aoe driver is back at version 47... there > have been *many* improvements, particularly for performance, that I need in > the later d

[arch-general] help building aoe block driver against kernel 3.2.4

Like the subject says, I need a hand building the latest aoe block driver (available here [1]). The built-in aoe driver is back at version 47... there have been *many* improvements, particularly for performance, that I need in the later driver releases. I had great success building the driver a

Re: [arch-general] Nvidia Driver issues

On 02/04/2012 07:08 AM, Martti Kühne wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 07:08:34AM -0800, Don deJuan wrote: pgrep -P `pidof openbox` | xargs kill -s SIGTERM sleep 5 it throws an error in regards to pgrep, I believe but it goes by so quickly I can not read the whole thing. So not really sure whats

Re: [arch-general] What hapenned to netcfg ?

Am 07.02.2012 18:40, schrieb Leonid Isaev: > In the bug reports [1] I didn't see many patches... Have you tried contacting > the existing maintainer directly? There is no maintainer. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] What hapenned to netcfg ?

On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:56:44 +0100 Alfredo Palhares wrote: > > Hello, > > I was just talking about this on #archlinux-offtopic. > > No one is acepting patches[1] to the netcfg[2] project. > I aplied as mainteiner when help was asked[3] (as masterkorp) . No replies. > Can i apply again ? Is a

Re: [arch-general] What hapenned to netcfg ?

Am 07.02.2012 10:56, schrieb Alfredo Palhares: > > Hello, > > I was just talking about this on #archlinux-offtopic. > > No one is acepting patches[1] to the netcfg[2] project. > I aplied as mainteiner when help was asked[3] (as masterkorp) . No replies. > Can i apply again ? Is anyone taking c

[arch-general] What hapenned to netcfg ?

Hello, I was just talking about this on #archlinux-offtopic. No one is acepting patches[1] to the netcfg[2] project. I aplied as mainteiner when help was asked[3] (as masterkorp) . No replies. Can i apply again ? Is anyone taking care of it? I have a a local repo with the patches and bugfixes