lmfao calvin
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 29 December 2011 20:55, Baho Utot wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thursday 29 December 2011 08:45:11 pm Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Baho Utot
> > wrote:
> > > > http:///trinity.bildanet.com/i686
On 29 December 2011 20:55, Baho Utot wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 29 December 2011 08:45:11 pm Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Baho Utot
> wrote:
> > > http:///trinity.bildanet.com/i686
> >
> > Have you tried with 2 '/' (slashes) after 'http:' instead of 3?
>
> No I have
On Thursday 29 December 2011 08:45:11 pm Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Baho Utot
wrote:
> > http:///trinity.bildanet.com/i686
>
> Have you tried with 2 '/' (slashes) after 'http:' instead of 3?
No I have not.
I tried that and it now works
Thank you
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> http:///trinity.bildanet.com/i686
Have you tried with 2 '/' (slashes) after 'http:' instead of 3?
I would like to setup a local repository for my trinity packages
I have a server with apache installed and a virtual host is configured.
I copied all the files to the server and did a repo-add trinity.db.gz *.pkg.*
I put this into the server pacman.conf
[trinity]
Server = file:///srv/http/trinit
Am Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:55:19 +0800
schrieb Oon-Ee Ng :
> While top-posting discussions are interesting and all, I'd really
> prefer an answer to my initial query on extramodules
> /lib/modules/3.1.*-*-ARCH/extramodules rather than in
> /lib/modules/extramodules-3.1.*-*-ARCH
I would prefer the se
On Dec 30, 2011 5:14 AM, "Patrick Burroughs" wrote:
>
> This is a purely a matter of netiquette, and can't be blamed on the
application.
>
> ~Celti
While top-posting discussions are interesting and all, I'd really prefer an
answer to my initial query on extramodules
On Dec 30, 2011 3:32 AM, "David Kolb" wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/29/2011 1:57 PM, Don Juan wrote:
> > If its a repeated question why not either no one respond which
> > would force the person to research on their own or just send one
> > message to check t
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 14:01, Heiko Baums wrote:
> E-mail applications, particularly Google Mail, don't always follow the
> common standards. So if Google Mail doesn't respect the Netiquette and
> the common internet standards, you should interfere and refinish what
> it does automatically or use
Am Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:56:21 -0500
schrieb Jonathan Vasquez :
> You are correct. I just let my email application automatically handle
> the quoting.
E-mail applications, particularly Google Mail, don't always follow the
common standards. So if Google Mail doesn't respect the Netiquette and
the co
You are correct. I just let my email application automatically handle the
quoting.
On Dec 29, 2011 3:47 PM, "Heiko Baums" wrote:
> Am Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:12:53 -0500
> schrieb Jonathan Vasquez :
>
> > Hmm I always reply in a top post way since I see it as a faster way
> > to get the answer from t
Am Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:12:53 -0500
schrieb Jonathan Vasquez :
> Hmm I always reply in a top post way since I see it as a faster way
> to get the answer from the person without having to continuously
> scroll down. Also the quoted text (below the post) is history. It is
> only Hmm I always reply in
Hmm I always reply in a top post way since I see it as a faster way to get
the answer from the person without having to continuously scroll down. Also
the quoted text (below the post) is history. It is only Hmm I always reply
in a top post way since I see it as a faster way to get the answer from t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/29/2011 1:57 PM, Don Juan wrote:
> If its a repeated question why not either no one respond which
> would force the person to research on their own or just send one
> message to check the wiki and or other pertinent place where the
> info has bee
On 12/28/2011 10:16 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Steve Holmes wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:18:33AM +, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
Seriously? It's comments like this that make me wonder if subscribing to this
list is really worth it. At least you did go on to pro
Thanks for the response, but please don't top-post =)
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
wrote:
> I would go with either
>
> /lib/modules/extramodules//
>
> or
>
> /lib/modules//extramodules/
>
> But maybe this is just semantics and I'm just picky about directory
> structure.
To m
I would go with either
/lib/modules/extramodules//
or
/lib/modules//extramodules/
But maybe this is just semantics and I'm just picky about directory
structure.
On Dec 29, 2011 2:40 AM, "Oon-Ee Ng" wrote:
> I'm the maintainer of nvidia-beta-all -
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31
17 matches
Mail list logo
