On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:10 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> I hope somebody can point me in the right direction. I have a small dell I
> moved into our TV console to use as a media center box. I installed a wireless
> usb adapter 'WNA3100(v1) Wireless-N 300 [Broadcom BCM43231]' to join the box
> t
Guys,
I hope somebody can point me in the right direction. I have a small dell I
moved into our TV console to use as a media center box. I installed a wireless
usb adapter 'WNA3100(v1) Wireless-N 300 [Broadcom BCM43231]' to join the box to
our wireless network. The box dual-boots and works fine
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:47 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 01:17 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> Maybe it's because
>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-November/021972.html
>> ?
>
> That was it.. Missed the dev post :(
Don't feel bad, you're not the only one
On 12/16/2011 01:17 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> Maybe it's because
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-November/021972.html
> ?
That was it.. Missed the dev post :(
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:17:24PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:14 PM, David C. Rankin
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I haven't seen tpowa's normal kernel signoff
>
> Maybe it's because
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-November/021972.html
> ?
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:14 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> All,
>
> I haven't seen tpowa's normal kernel signoff
Maybe it's because
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-November/021972.html
?
All,
I haven't seen tpowa's normal kernel signoff, so just dropping a note it's
good on multiple x86_64 and i686 boxes here.
Only issue this time, which I haven't seen in the past 4-5 kernels, was the
x86_64 MSI box that had a problem with the boot image being placed in a location
that leaves
On 16 December 2011 11:06, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 11:01 -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> > On 16 December 2011 10:59, Ralf Madorf
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 15:33 +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > > > [snip] If you ban someone they soon
> > > > realise and could u
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 11:01 -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 10:59, Ralf Madorf wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 15:33 +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > > [snip] If you ban someone they soon
> > > realise and could use a different email. [snip]
> >
> > +1
> >
> > If somebody d
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 16:59 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 15:33 +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > [snip] If you ban someone they soon
> > realise and could use a different email. [snip]
>
> +1
>
> If somebody does something bad, friendly [off-list] explain this person
> that (s
* On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:47:03AM +0530, gt wrote:
Hello folks, i'll probably get flamed for reviving a very controversial,
yet consistently brought up topic.
I have seen a similar thread last year, and every other day, someone
points out to someone that top posting is bad.
I was off the li
On 16 December 2011 10:59, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 15:33 +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > [snip] If you ban someone they soon
> > realise and could use a different email. [snip]
>
> +1
>
> If somebody does something bad, friendly [off-list] explain this person
> that (s)he migh
On Friday 16 Dec 2011 15:37:01 Ralf Madorf wrote:
> The Internet anonymity is grotesque, it's like talking to a chatbot like
> ELIZA (Weizenbaum is one of my idols :). Did you note that most Linux users
> use their real names :)?
>
> This is more important for me than thinking about top and bottom
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 15:33 +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> [snip] If you ban someone they soon
> realise and could use a different email. [snip]
+1
If somebody does something bad, friendly [off-list] explain this person
that (s)he might should reconsider the style. If this person ignore your
inqu
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:10:30 +0200
Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote:
,hee hee
silly
being
your
now
well
> Remember how others wrote that bottom posting forces us to contemplate on
> the quoted parts? I don't know if you did, but I don't understand what you
> are saying and, incidentally, you forgot
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:17, gt wrote:
> Hello folks, i'll probably get flamed for reviving a very controversial,
> yet consistently brought up topic.
>
> I have seen a similar thread last year, and every other day, someone
> points out to someone that top posting is bad.
>
> I was off the list
On 2011-12-16 at 11:16 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> I agree.
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> > (...)
> >
> > My favourite option is to have someone with admin access to
> > the list (e.g. me...) just unsubscribe anyone who top posts.
Agreeing to unsubscribing top poste
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:36, Damjan wrote:
[...]
> The symptoms do not seem like a keyboard layout problem (which would
> affect everything in X) or a font problem.
>
> Also, the font and layout settings in rc.conf (or /etc/vconsole.conf)
> have NO effect for X.
>
>
>
> What this looks like is t
Am 16.12.2011 04:47, schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
> Yeah lets all just spam fuck gmail devs because they won't add a automatic
> bottom posting feature.
>
> Seriously...
>
> +++
>
> Since I'm uncertain how to handle incoming emails in the future I still use
> my providers M$ thingy. I prefer bottom po
Am 16.12.2011 15:41, schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
> [2011-12-16 14:51:43 +0100] G. Schlisio:
>> for me, top posting seemed to save scrolling time, and everything
>> included after the reply i regarded as a reference for remembering
>> discussion on the topic.
> Did you see the movie "Memento"?
>
>> man,
[2011-12-16 14:51:43 +0100] G. Schlisio:
> for me, top posting seemed to save scrolling time, and everything
> included after the reply i regarded as a reference for remembering
> discussion on the topic.
Did you see the movie "Memento"?
> man, i cant think of something more stupid…
Well, do you
> On 12/16/2011 04:59, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> > i mean, people don't act the same way with their own family vs.
> > the internet allows for obscene levels of
> > anonymity that simply *cannot* exist in traditional/direct
> > communication
We are humans so it's not bad if we misbehave, act li
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 14:51 +0100, G. Schlisio wrote:
>
> Am 16.12.2011 11:20, schrieb Allan McRae:
> > On 16/12/11 12:17, gt wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> > My favourite option is to have someone with admin access to the list
> > (e.g. me...) just unsubscribe anyone who top posts.
> >
> > Allan
> >
> r
Am 16.12.2011 11:20, schrieb Allan McRae:
On 16/12/11 12:17, gt wrote:
I have seen a similar thread last year, and every other day, someone
points out to someone that top posting is bad.
I was off the list for a while, and now when i came back, the story is
still the same.
And your email has
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 11:33 +0200, Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote:
> [snip]
> I have tried reading some of your messages in the last days, but it was
> too difficult to understand who you are talking with, what you are
> replying to and what do multiple lines of "+++" mean. Thought I'd simply
> ignore th
Kevin Chadwick (2011-12-16 11:20):
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:06:50 +0530
> Piyush P Kurur wrote:
>
> > I am in support for this action. Besides this adds an additional
> > "feature" to the mailing list. Once one is tired of a mailing list,
> > instead of unsubscribing via normal ways just sent a to
On 12/16/2011 04:59, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
wrote:
On 12/16/2011 02:03, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. wrote:
I don't really think that people put any conscious thought into if they
should top or bottom post. A majority of mail clients and
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org on behalf of Calvin Morrison
> Sent: Fri 12/16/2011 04:21
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Top Posting Revisited
>
> On 15 December 2011 22:07,
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:06:50 +0530
Piyush P Kurur wrote:
> I am in support for this action. Besides this adds an additional
> "feature" to the mailing list. Once one is tired of a mailing list,
> instead of unsubscribing via normal ways just sent a top posted reply
> to the next email from the lis
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:20:42PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> And your email has changed the world and we will not see a repeat of
> this in the future. Hooray!
>
>
> My favourite option is to have someone with admin access to the list
> (e.g. me...) just unsubscribe anyone who top posts.
>
I
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Alex Bolgarov wrote:
>> you all think the proper fix is for
>> me to put in the docs something like "on Arch systems you need to do
>> [x] before building", whether [x] is "get the PKGBUILD with the patch
>> from AUR" or even "run the sed-python-with-python2.sh inc
The 16/12/11, Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote:
> I have tried reading some of your messages in the last days, but it was
> too difficult to understand who you are talking with, what you are
> replying to and what do multiple lines of "+++" mean. Thought I'd simply
> ignore them, but since this is kind of
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 16/12/11 12:17, gt wrote:
[...]
> My favourite option is to have someone with admin access to the list
> (e.g. me...) just unsubscribe anyone who top posts.
Power corrupts, absolute power ... is even more fun :D
Rafa
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:19:59 +0100
"Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
> I don't really think that people put any conscious thought into if they
> should top or bottom post.
That is the real issue and banning top-posting solves most problems but
can actually cost a reader time in some cases.
Do unto others a
I agree.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 16/12/11 12:17, gt wrote:
>> I have seen a similar thread last year, and every other day, someone
>> points out to someone that top posting is bad.
>>
>> I was off the list for a while, and now when i came back, the story is
>> st
On 16/12/11 12:17, gt wrote:
> I have seen a similar thread last year, and every other day, someone
> points out to someone that top posting is bad.
>
> I was off the list for a while, and now when i came back, the story is
> still the same.
And your email has changed the world and we will not se
On 16/12/2011, at 06:19, Rafa Griman wrote:
>
> There are other reasons I've seen:
> - people that use "smart" phones have a limited screen size and
> it's "easier" to top post.
> - from a behavioural point of view, people follow these steps:
> 1.- read the whole mail
>
Ralf Mardorf (2011-12-16 04:47):
> -Original Message-
> From: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org on behalf of Calvin Morrison
> Sent: Fri 12/16/2011 04:21
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Top Posting Revisited
Your "M$ thingy" is kind of verbose ^^^.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org on behalf of Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr.
> Sent: Fri 12/16/2011 05:03
>
> I don't really think that people put any conscious thought into if they
> should top or bottom post. A m
HI :)
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org on behalf of Calvin Morrison
> Sent: Fri 12/16/2011 04:21
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Top Posting Revisited
[...]
> I'm
40 matches
Mail list logo
