On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 02:03, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. wrote:
>>
>> I don't really think that people put any conscious thought into if they
>> should top or bottom post. A majority of mail clients and
>> the aforementioned Gmail default to to
On 12/16/2011 02:03, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. wrote:
I don't really think that people put any conscious thought into if they
should top or bottom post. A majority of mail clients and
the aforementioned Gmail default to top posting. What I would like to know
is why is this the common practice. Obvio
[2011-12-16 04:47:14 +0100] Ralf Mardorf:
> Do we really need rules and rules and rules?
We don't. But it's not just about you writing messages the way you want:
it's about other people being able to read them conveniently, especially
you expect them to consider the points you are making or questi
> On 15/12/2011, at 8:32 PM, Frédéric Perrin wrote:
>
> > On 14.12.2011 01:02, Sébastien Leblanc wrote:
> >>In your case it would be the Australian English locale (en_AU, I
> >> think).
> >
> > What is the difference between en_GB, en_US and en_AU ? Is the motd
> > updated to tell you "Good mor
When in a private correspondence, regardless of the number of
participants, the context is probably known and thus there is no need
to read previous replies. I would reply like this, because I only care
about what you and I are talking about at this point of time - there
is no need for any referenc
-Original Message-
From: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org on behalf of Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr.
Sent: Fri 12/16/2011 05:03
I don't really think that people put any conscious thought into if they
should top or bottom post. A majority of mail clients and
the aforementioned Gmail default to t
I don't really think that people put any conscious thought into if they
should top or bottom post. A majority of mail clients and
the aforementioned Gmail default to top posting. What I would like to know
is why is this the common practice. Obviously, people on forums and mailing
lists like everyth
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
> i'm not sure how the script works. i went to the link you gave and hit
> the install button. i closed all chromium instances and opened the
> browser again. still, bottom posting is not automatic.
Might be a Chromium issue. I'm on Firefox v3.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Alex Liu wrote:
> However, there exists a bottom posting script for Greasemonkey if you
> want to check that out.
> http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/35866
> An according lab feature has been suggested some time ago in the Gmail
> group, but as of no there has b
-Original Message-
From: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org on behalf of Calvin Morrison
Sent: Fri 12/16/2011 04:21
To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
Subject: Re: [arch-general] Top Posting Revisited
On 15 December 2011 22:07, Sander Jansen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:17 PM
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Kazuo Teramoto wrote:
> Part of the whole 'bottom posting' thing is about *reading* and
> *thinking* about the reply and not *automatic* replying to a message.
This.
I think it's not about if the reply is above or below whatever you
quote but because a full quot
On Dec 16, 2011 9:06 AM, "Kazuo Teramoto" wrote:
>
> On 2011-12-16T01:21:22, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> >Yeah lets all just spam fuck gmail devs because they won't add a
automatic
> >bottom posting feature.
> >
>
> I don't think this is a solution.
>
> Part of the whole 'bottom posting' thing is abo
On 2011-12-16T01:21:22, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>Yeah lets all just spam fuck gmail devs because they won't add a automatic
>bottom posting feature.
>
I don't think this is a solution.
Part of the whole 'bottom posting' thing is about *reading* and
*thinking* about the reply and not *automatic* re
On 15 December 2011 22:07, Sander Jansen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:17 PM, gt wrote:
> > Hello folks, i'll probably get flamed for reviving a very controversial,
> > yet consistently brought up topic.
> >
> > I have seen a similar thread last year, and every other day, someone
> > points
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:17 PM, gt wrote:
> Hello folks, i'll probably get flamed for reviving a very controversial,
> yet consistently brought up topic.
>
> I have seen a similar thread last year, and every other day, someone
> points out to someone that top posting is bad.
>
> I was off the lis
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:17 AM, gt wrote:
> Hello folks, i'll probably get flamed for reviving a very controversial,
> yet consistently brought up topic.
I think it is very pertinent. I'll start a similar post in archlinux-br.
> I suggest all of the top-posting haters should including one of t
On 15 December 2011 21:17, gt wrote:
> Hello folks, i'll probably get flamed for reviving a very controversial,
> yet consistently brought up topic.
>
> I have seen a similar thread last year, and every other day, someone
> points out to someone that top posting is bad.
>
> I was off the list for
Hello folks, i'll probably get flamed for reviving a very controversial,
yet consistently brought up topic.
I have seen a similar thread last year, and every other day, someone
points out to someone that top posting is bad.
I was off the list for a while, and now when i came back, the story is
st
> There is nothing that stands out, and changing the font doesn't
> improve things at all :(
>
> I also tried logging into Gnome3 (using GDM) and then I do get the
> accented characters, in both lxterminal and gnome-terminal.
The symptoms do not seem like a keyboard layout problem (which would
a
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 12:41 AM, Grant McDuling wrote:
>> Thanks everyone for your help. I have Arch (Gnome) up and running
>> beautifully and I am now a convert. But when I boot up, I don't have an Arch
>> logo on the boot up screen as I see some do
On 12/16/2011 12:41 AM, Grant McDuling wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your help. I have Arch (Gnome) up and running beautifully
> and I am now a convert. But when I boot up, I don't have an Arch logo on the
> boot up screen as I see some do on You Tube. Any way I can fix this?
>
> Grant
>
Welcom
Thanks everyone for your help. I have Arch (Gnome) up and running beautifully
and I am now a convert. But when I boot up, I don't have an Arch logo on the
boot up screen as I see some do on You Tube. Any way I can fix this?
Grant
On 15/12/2011, at 8:32 PM, Frédéric Perrin wrote:
> On 14.12.20
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:12:13PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez
> wrote:
> > Is there any way to give Arch Linux developers feedback about which
> > packages are more popular (# of installations). Maybe it could be
> > useful for them
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez
wrote:
> Is there any way to give Arch Linux developers feedback about which
> packages are more popular (# of installations). Maybe it could be
> useful for them when deciding which new packages to support and which
> one to drop from t
Is there any way to give Arch Linux developers feedback about which
packages are more popular (# of installations). Maybe it could be
useful for them when deciding which new packages to support and which
one to drop from the repository.
As far as I know it exists Debian Popularity Contest, wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/12/11 14:20, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:
> +1 to archlinux initiative. Someone has to be the first and as
> always arch is there. Actually python, read python3, as default is
> one of the reasons I use arch. Hector
>
> On 15 December 2011 17:58
+1 to archlinux initiative. Someone has to be the first and as always
arch is there. Actually python, read python3, as default is one of the
reasons I use arch.
Hector
On 15 December 2011 17:58, Thanasis Georgiou wrote:
> Sorry I meant 'in a different path among distributions'. Forgot to
> doubl
Sorry I meant 'in a different path among distributions'. Forgot to double-check.
On 15 December 2011 17:56, Thanasis Georgiou wrote:
> Or use #!/usr/bin/env python2. This should fix problems like python2
> being in a different path among distribution.
Or use #!/usr/bin/env python2. This should fix problems like python2
being in a different path among distribution.
On 15 December 2011 17:51, Alex Bolgarov wrote:>>
you all think the proper fix is for>> me to put in the docs something
like "on Arch systems you need to do>> [x] before building", wh
> you all think the proper fix is for
> me to put in the docs something like "on Arch systems you need to do
> [x] before building", whether [x] is "get the PKGBUILD with the patch
> from AUR" or even "run the sed-python-with-python2.sh included in the
> distribution".
I personally don't think it
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 08:48:25PM -0800, Evan Martin wrote:
> I just wanted to be certain that you all think the proper fix is for
> me to put in the docs something like "on Arch systems you need to do
> [x] before building", whether [x] is "get the PKGBUILD with the patch
> from AUR" or even "run
> What is the difference between en_GB, en_US and en_AU ? Is the motd
> updated to tell you "Good morning, Sir", "Hi guy" or "Good day, mate"?
man 7 locale
This affects stuff like spelling differences, dd/mm/ or mm/dd/
dates, 12 hour or 24 hour clocks.
==
John K Pate http://homepages.inf
On 14.12.2011 01:02, Sébastien Leblanc wrote:
In your case it would be the Australian English locale (en_AU, I
think).
What is the difference between en_GB, en_US and en_AU ? Is the motd
updated to tell you "Good morning, Sir", "Hi guy" or "Good day, mate"?
--
Fred
On 15-12-2011 08:51, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 21:07, Mauro Santos
> wrote:
> [...]
>> Thinking better about it, check your pacman logs for any font updates
>> and try setting the terminal emulator to use a different font, maybe to
>> a font that renders properly in other p
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:51, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 21:07, Mauro Santos
> wrote:
> [...]
>> Thinking better about it, check your pacman logs for any font updates
>> and try setting the terminal emulator to use a different font, maybe to
>> a font that renders properly
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 21:07, Mauro Santos wrote:
[...]
> Thinking better about it, check your pacman logs for any font updates
> and try setting the terminal emulator to use a different font, maybe to
> a font that renders properly in other places like a text editor.
There is nothing that stand
36 matches
Mail list logo
