On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 19:38, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>> On (10/24/11 18:00), Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> -~> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Leonid Isaev
>> wrote:
>> -~> > Besides, one really doesn't have to enable testing in pacman.conf --
>>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Erwin José Lopez Pulgarin
wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Just to communicate that the archlinux forum pages are all down for the time
> being, I guess you already know that but just wanting to make sure in case
> you didn't.
>
Yup, forums are down.
I've e-mailed Ioni, flo
Greetings
Just to communicate that the archlinux forum pages are all down for the time
being, I guess you already know that but just wanting to make sure in case
you didn't.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On (10/24/11 18:00), Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> -~> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> -~> > Besides, one really doesn't have to enable testing in pacman.conf --
> individual
> -~> > pacman -U will do, imho.
> -~>
> -~> I'
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> There are two ways to solve this: either merge your / and your /usr
> partitions, or make your initramfs mount /usr so init won't even know
> that /usr is separate.
>
> We are currently working on adding support for the second approach,
> but
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Dwight Schauer wrote:
> I've been using Arch Linux for about 4 years now. I have it on a few
> important systems at work and it has been doing very well.
>
> This morning I saw "/usr is not mounted. This is not supported." in my
> boot up after a recent rc.sysinit
On (10/24/11 18:00), Karol Blazewicz wrote:
-~> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
-~> > Besides, one really doesn't have to enable testing in pacman.conf --
individual
-~> > pacman -U will do, imho.
-~>
-~> I've read that [testing] is all or nothing and you shouldn't
-~> cherr
On 10/24/2011 06:58 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 10/24/2011 06:37 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
While we're at it, what it the preferred way to contact our Dear Arch
Overlords if something is malfunctioning?
Pierre said "try to contact us immedi
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Besides, one really doesn't have to enable testing in pacman.conf --
> individual
> pacman -U will do, imho.
I've read that [testing] is all or nothing and you shouldn't
cherrypick packages because you might break something.
Somewhat relevan
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 10/24/2011 06:37 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> While we're at it, what it the preferred way to contact our Dear Arch
>> Overlords if something is malfunctioning?
>> Pierre said "try to contact us immediately"
>> https://bbs.archlinux.org/view
On (10/24/11 09:37), Myra Nelson wrote:
-~> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 06:53, Tom Gundersen wrote:
-~> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
-~> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
-~> >>
-~> >>> Maybe this requirement should be communicated more clearly (e.g
On 10/24/2011 06:37 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 10/24/2011 05:30 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote:
Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum
seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are
located
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 10/24/2011 05:30 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote:
>>
>> Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum
>> seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are
>> located on the same host). Does anyone know w
On 10/24/2011 05:30 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote:
Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum
seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are
located on the same host). Does anyone know what the situation is?
the services had come back online in the
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote:
> Jelle van der Waa, Mon 2011-10-24 @ 16:41:53+0200:
>> For now: Use google Cache, way back machine? Else pacman -Ss arch wiki
>> (it's from 15 october so it should be fine)
>
> Thanks, I didn't know the wiki was available as a downloadable pa
Am 24.10.2011 16:42, schrieb Dwight Schauer:
> I've been using Arch Linux for about 4 years now. I have it on a few
> important systems at work and it has been doing very well.
>
> This morning I saw "/usr is not mounted. This is not supported." in my
> boot up after a recent rc.sysinit update.
B
On 2011-10-24 17:42, Dwight Schauer wrote:
This morning I saw "/usr is not mounted. This is not supported." in my
boot up after a recent rc.sysinit update.
What is this, bait and switch? I've been running Linux and BSD systems
since 1996 and typically always have /usr in a separate partition (as
This is not a new thing, it has been "broken" for quite a while.
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
Sander
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Dwight Schauer wrote:
> I've been using Arch Linux for about 4 years now. I have it on a few
> important systems at work
Jelle van der Waa, Mon 2011-10-24 @ 16:41:53+0200:
> For now: Use google Cache, way back machine? Else pacman -Ss arch wiki
> (it's from 15 october so it should be fine)
Thanks, I didn't know the wiki was available as a downloadable package.
That will suffice for now.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:30:26AM -0400, Taylor Hedberg wrote:
> Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum
> seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are
> located on the same host). Does anyone know what the situation is?
There has been a ha
Paul Gideon Dann, Mon 2011-10-24 @ 15:35:58+0100:
> They both look fine to me. Maybe an issue with your local DNS?
Strange, I've tried it from multiple hosts, including remote hosts in
other cities/on other ISPs, all with the same result, no response from
the server. I haven't seen a problem with
I've been using Arch Linux for about 4 years now. I have it on a few
important systems at work and it has been doing very well.
This morning I saw "/usr is not mounted. This is not supported." in my
boot up after a recent rc.sysinit update.
What is this, bait and switch? I've been running Linux a
On Monday 24 Oct 2011 09:38:19 Dwight Schauer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Paul Gideon Dann
wrote:
> > On Monday 24 Oct 2011 10:30:26 Taylor Hedberg wrote:
> >> Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and
> >> forum
> >> seem to have been down for at least a few
On 24/10/11 16:38, Dwight Schauer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
On Monday 24 Oct 2011 10:30:26 Taylor Hedberg wrote:
Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum
seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are
l
Le Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:38:19 -0500,
Dwight Schauer a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Paul Gideon Dann
> wrote:
> > On Monday 24 Oct 2011 10:30:26 Taylor Hedberg wrote:
> >> Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and
> >> forum seem to have been down for at least
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> On Monday 24 Oct 2011 10:30:26 Taylor Hedberg wrote:
>> Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum
>> seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are
>> located on the same host). Does any
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 06:53, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe this requirement should be communicated more clearly (e.g. a
>>> comment in the standard pacman.conf)?
>>
>> Great id
On Monday 24 Oct 2011 10:30:26 Taylor Hedberg wrote:
> Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum
> seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are
> located on the same host). Does anyone know what the situation is?
They both look fine to me. Ma
Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum
seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are
located on the same host). Does anyone know what the situation is?
bibleo.org doesn't appear in the current mirrorlist.
assuming you mean ibiblieo, that last synced 10 days ago
Could it be that your mirrorlist [1] is outdated?
Perhaps check for /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist.pacnew
[1] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/any/pacman-mirrorlist/
2011/10/24 Steve Hol
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> I assume he meant ibiblieo, a giant internet archive/library.
There is a mirror there:
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/archlinux/
But it has not been updated for 10 days.
--
Cédric Girard
2011/10/24 Cédric Girard :
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Steve Holmes wrote:
>
>> I've been doing 'pacman -Syu' for several days in a row lately to see
>> no updates. Is bibleo.org still a good repo in the US? Is aArch all
>> that quiet lately or am I missing something?
>>
>
> Your mirror doe
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Steve Holmes wrote:
> I've been doing 'pacman -Syu' for several days in a row lately to see
> no updates. Is bibleo.org still a good repo in the US? Is aArch all
> that quiet lately or am I missing something?
>
Your mirror does not even appear here:
https://www.a
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Steve Holmes wrote:
> I've been doing 'pacman -Syu' for several days in a row lately to see
> no updates. Is bibleo.org still a good repo in the US? Is aArch all
> that quiet lately or am I missing something?
>
there's an up-to-date list of mirrors on archlinux.o
I've been doing 'pacman -Syu' for several days in a row lately to see
no updates. Is bibleo.org still a good repo in the US? Is aArch all
that quiet lately or am I missing something?
Am Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:24:26 +0200
schrieb Tom Gundersen :
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Oon-Ee Ng
> wrote:
> > A user basically is using [testing] without fulfilling the above
> > requirements. Should the user be advised not to use [testing] or is
> > this counter-productive to the purpose
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
>> Maybe this requirement should be communicated more clearly (e.g. a
>> comment in the standard pacman.conf)?
>
> Great idea. I mean, as a non-[testing] user I get that guinea pig
> f
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Maybe this requirement should be communicated more clearly (e.g. a
> comment in the standard pacman.conf)?
Great idea. I mean, as a non-[testing] user I get that guinea pig
feeling which comes naturally with linux often enough. Don't miss
Hi. I'm trying to translate some articles into Turkish. While looking
to the net, i've found a wiki extension named Translate extension.
Advantages of this extension as well as the contact information of
authors can be found here:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Translate
Features incl
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> A user basically is using [testing] without fulfilling the above
> requirements. Should the user be advised not to use [testing] or is
> this counter-productive to the purpose of [testing]?
It is very important that people use testing [0], so we
On Friday 21 Oct 2011 20:05:18 R7h0re4 wrote:
> Just to be safe I added the full path to my script for the commands it
> is calling.
>
> I also looked at the wiki again and nothing mentions the use of Cronie,
> and system cron jobs. I also checked the file /var/spool and see anacron
> which has th
41 matches
Mail list logo
