On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Leonid Isaev <lis...@umail.iu.edu> wrote: > On (10/24/11 18:00), Karol Blazewicz wrote: > -~> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Leonid Isaev <lis...@umail.iu.edu> wrote: > -~> > Besides, one really doesn't have to enable testing in pacman.conf -- > individual > -~> > pacman -U will do, imho. > -~> > -~> I've read that [testing] is all or nothing and you shouldn't > -~> cherrypick packages because you might break something. > -~> Somewhat relevant https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=127144 > > That's where brain comes in handy :) > Yes, its a REALLY good idea to state that its okay to pacman -U individual [testing] packages on a public mailing list with at least some users who really don't know any better than to do just that.
- [arch-general] Discussion on usage of [testing] repo - min... Oon-Ee Ng
- Re: [arch-general] Discussion on usage of [testing] r... Gaetan Bisson
- Re: [arch-general] Discussion on usage of [testing] r... Tom Gundersen
- Re: [arch-general] Discussion on usage of [testin... Martti Kühne
- Re: [arch-general] Discussion on usage of [te... Tom Gundersen
- Re: [arch-general] Discussion on usage of... Myra Nelson
- Re: [arch-general] Discussion on usa... Leonid Isaev
- Re: [arch-general] Discussion on... Karol Blazewicz
- Re: [arch-general] Discussio... Leonid Isaev
- Re: [arch-general] Discussio... Oon-Ee Ng
- Re: [arch-general] Discussio... Myra Nelson
- Re: [arch-general] Discussio... Leonid Isaev
- Re: [arch-general] Discussio... Tom Gundersen
- Re: [arch-general] Discussio... Myra Nelson
- Re: [arch-general] Discussion on usage of [testin... Heiko Baums