On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:34:46 -0500
C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> if you want to use it you'll probably just want to keep close eye on
> development and be conservative about chosen options (eg. bootloaders
> cant handle compression/etc), but IME at least it's been pretty solid
> all things consider
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:17 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Simon Schneider
> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I was about to use btrfs for my new SSD but I couldn't find any reason why I
>> shouldn't stay with my normal LVM and ext4 setup. Is there any particular
>> reason wh
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Simon Schneider
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was about to use btrfs for my new SSD but I couldn't find any reason why I
> shouldn't stay with my normal LVM and ext4 setup. Is there any particular
> reason why everyone is so crazy about that new fs?
for me at least i like how
Am 22.08.2011 18:35 schrieb "C Anthony Risinger" :
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:38:52 +0200
> > Thomas Bächler wrote:
> >
> >> Using LVM and software RAID is the right thing to do here. Any
> >> particular reason why you don't want it?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:38:52 +0200
> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
>> Using LVM and software RAID is the right thing to do here. Any
>> particular reason why you don't want it?
>
> To have one layer less.
>
>> btrfs is not ZFS. and btrfs is
On 08/22/2011 01:41 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Dave Reisner
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:13:45PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.88-1 are in testing for upstream
>>> update. Please test and signoff.
>>>
>>> Eric
>>
AFAK refilling the toner is fine for 2 or 3 times maybe. but refilling it a
lot will cause loss of print quality. It depends also on the type of the
toner and the quality of ink. sometimes even 6 or 7 refills might work, but
that's a rare case! :D
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Madhurya Kakati w
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:38:52 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Using LVM and software RAID is the right thing to do here. Any
> particular reason why you don't want it?
To have one layer less.
> btrfs is not ZFS. and btrfs is still experimental, and I think there
> are some people here who had bad
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:43:58 +0200 Seblu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
> wrote:
> > Afaics, btrfs will soon get fsck tool for repairing the fs, but I
> > wonder what's the plan for btrfs support in Arch, iow, when it can
> > become 'official' ?
>
> BTRFS is alrea
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa wrote:
> Hello!
>
> After package manager which can server both official repos & AUR,there is
> another thing which I consider before returning back to Arch - filesystem.
>
> On FreeBSD I now use zfs running on two 1TB disks in mirror (raid-1) m
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa wrote:
> Afaics, btrfs will soon get fsck tool for repairing the fs, but I wonder
> what's
> the plan for btrfs support in Arch, iow, when it can become 'official' ?
BTRFS is already supported by initscripts:
https://projects.archlinux.org/ini
Am 22.08.2011 08:17, schrieb Gour-Gadadhara Dasa:
> I'd like to have similar setup on Arch, but without using lvm2+raid-1 (if
> possible),
Using LVM and software RAID is the right thing to do here. Any
particular reason why you don't want it?
> so I did research a bit about zfs on Linux and it lo
12 matches
Mail list logo
