On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:43:58 +0200 Seblu <se...@seblu.net> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa > <g...@atmarama.net> wrote: > > Afaics, btrfs will soon get fsck tool for repairing the fs, but I > > wonder what's the plan for btrfs support in Arch, iow, when it can > > become 'official' ? > > BTRFS is already supported by initscripts: > https://projects.archlinux.org/initscripts.git/commit/?id=ca372312062e7843ca69e2edd54b58ab609a69ee > > and package is in core distro repository: > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/btrfs-progs-unstable/ > > This sounds "official". But as underline Thomas, btrfs is still > unstable ! However, ubuntu does not seem to be afraid : > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/btrfs >
There is enough reason to be afraid. After 4 weeks of unencumbered using, rm'ing a directory failed with the error "directory not empty". A fs check showed errors, as expected, but of course I wasn't able to repair it. Now I'm back to ext4.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
