i have dolphin installed and using it in awesome WM, it doesn't see
services that are not turned on.
I tried to do both full/minimal kde install, accessing dolphin settings
from kde, still the same
it looks like this
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/7612434/2011-06-07-063524_533x451_scrot.png.htm
On 06/06/2011 09:17 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
On Monday, June 06, 2011 11:34:53 Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Tavian Barnes
wrote:
On 6 June 2011 10:02, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
Hi all,
Since the next kernel will be 3.0 , the kernel26 naming is
meaningless from th
Thank you all for your suggestions,
Hector
On 6 June 2011 22:05, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Javier Vasquez
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Hector Martinez-Seara
>>> wrote:
Hi,
>>
I'd say it would be better to have only one current and one lts kernel
(or whatever it ends up being called).
Having multiple older versions of the same package is not what it said
in the can, arch uses the latest stable versions of packages and not the
latest plus some number of older ones.
--
Am Samstag 04 Juni 2011 schrieb JM:
> Hello,
>
> The current installer images are from 05.2010 which is over a year
> old. I was unable to install Arch on my new laptop using this
> installer due to insufficient hardware support in kernel 2.6.33. Are
> there any plans to update it?
>
> Regards,
>
On Monday, June 06, 2011 11:34:53 Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Tavian Barnes
>
> wrote:
> > On 6 June 2011 10:02, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> Since the next kernel will be 3.0 , the kernel26 naming is
> >> meaningless from the next kernel. I think th
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Javier Vasquez
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Hector Martinez-Seara
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> The case is that we use usb external drives for storing data. It is
>>> likely not the most effici
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Hector Martinez-Seara
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> The case is that we use usb external drives for storing data. It is
>> likely not the most efficient way but is very very cheap. And yes they
>> are plug 24/7. Anyway
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 06-06-2011 13:58, Yaro Kasear wrote:
>
> > There's no reason to ever, ever, put USB drives in the fstab. Look at the
> top
> > of the fstab file, it reads "static file system information." Unless
> you're
> > guaranteed to have your thumbdr
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Tavian Barnes wrote:
> I have kernel26-lts installed as a backup kernel, and this is all
> that's really necessary for rolling back broken kernel updates. I've
> been bitten by a BTRFS bug once and rolled back with -lts no problem.
> -1 from me on keeping multiple
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Tavian Barnes
wrote:
> On 6 June 2011 10:02, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Since the next kernel will be 3.0 , the kernel26 naming is
>> meaningless from the next kernel. I think this is also a good time to
>> consider implementing versioned kernel inst
On 6 June 2011 10:02, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> Hi all,
> Since the next kernel will be 3.0 , the kernel26 naming is
> meaningless from the next kernel. I think this is also a good time to
> consider implementing versioned kernel install. Agreed arch has a
> policy of 1 package per software in
Hi all,
Since the next kernel will be 3.0 , the kernel26 naming is
meaningless from the next kernel. I think this is also a good time to
consider implementing versioned kernel install. Agreed arch has a
policy of 1 package per software in the official repos. While this
attitude is acceptab
On 06-06-2011 13:58, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> There's no reason to ever, ever, put USB drives in the fstab. Look at the top
> of the fstab file, it reads "static file system information." Unless you're
> guaranteed to have your thumbdrive plugged into your computer 24/7 and never
> remove it, it do
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:
> Hi,
> The case is that we use usb external drives for storing data. It is
> likely not the most efficient way but is very very cheap. And yes they
> are plug 24/7. Anyway I will look for some post booting deamon that
> cant take care o
Hi,
The case is that we use usb external drives for storing data. It is
likely not the most efficient way but is very very cheap. And yes they
are plug 24/7. Anyway I will look for some post booting deamon that
cant take care of them. Any idea anyone where to look for?
Hector
On 6 June 2011 15:58,
On Monday, June 06, 2011 07:39:03 Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:
> Thanks Tom for taking your time to answer,
> I will follow your advises to try to stabilize my system. I will try
> to downgrade my system also. If I see that this helps I will let you
> know, just in case this is a bug an not a simpl
Thanks Tom for taking your time to answer,
I will follow your advises to try to stabilize my system. I will try
to downgrade my system also. If I see that this helps I will let you
know, just in case this is a bug an not a simple speeding problem.
Thanks again,
Hector
On 6 June 2011 15:25, Tom Gun
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:
> Which information exactly do you need? I can provide you any
> information you may require if you explain me how to gather it (I'm
> not as good as most of you).
As far as I can tell, the problem is as described below (i.e., this is
n
Hi,
Which information exactly do you need? I can provide you any
information you may require if you explain me how to gather it (I'm
not as good as most of you).
Regarding testing. I don't want to use testing in this computer as it
has some sensitive data.
Regarding non mounting at boot it is rat
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:
> t 4 days I've been again experiencing problems with my usb
> disks at boot. Right now it is not as bad as before, it fails around
> 75% of the boots which is still unacceptable. The problem was totally
> solved with udev-168-2. But a
On 06/06/2011 10:54, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
For now use
wget --inet4-only# or
curl --ipv4
to ensure both use only ipv4 addresses.
Or shorter:
wget -4
curl -4
--
slubman
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:30, Abdul Halim wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>
>>
>> That seems consistent with what I'm experiencing, this does not happen
>> in my university. I get the following:-
>>
>> ngoonee@ngoonee-laptop ~ % wget -O - icanhazip.com
>> --2011-06-06 14
Hi,
for the last 4 days I've been again experiencing problems with my usb
disks at boot. Right now it is not as bad as before, it fails around
75% of the boots which is still unacceptable. The problem was totally
solved with udev-168-2. But at some point, currently udev-171-1, the
problem was ba
Hello, I'm using XeLaTeX with PSTricks, and run into a
problem. After some STFW, I read that I may need to add
`-dNOSAFER' to the `rungs' line in
/usr/share/texmf/dvipdfmx/dvipdfmx.cfg, and I did so. But
the actual command seen from the output of compilation
didn't change:
** WARNING ** Filtering
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>
> That seems consistent with what I'm experiencing, this does not happen
> in my university. I get the following:-
>
> ngoonee@ngoonee-laptop ~ % wget -O - icanhazip.com
> --2011-06-06 14:21:38-- http://icanhazip.com/
> Resolving icanhazip.com..
26 matches
Mail list logo
