Re: [arch-general] qtcurve for gtk3/GNOME3?

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:19 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote: > I'm not loving this GNOME3 upgrade.  Latest irritation is that all the gtk > apps are no longer picking up the qtcurve theme that I use on all my apps > to make a uniform desktop.  Is there any way to enable this? > > Thanks, > > DR qtcur

[arch-general] qtcurve for gtk3/GNOME3?

I'm not loving this GNOME3 upgrade. Latest irritation is that all the gtk apps are no longer picking up the qtcurve theme that I use on all my apps to make a uniform desktop. Is there any way to enable this? Thanks, DR

Re: [arch-general] What broke?!?!?!?

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Ty John wrote: > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:20 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote: > >> On 05/02/2011 11:12 AM, Rafa Griman wrote: >> >>> Are you using xorg-server-catalyst-maximize-fix? I was and the latest >>> update left my kbd and mouse unuseable under X. Solution

Re: [arch-general] What broke?!?!?!?

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:20 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote: > On 05/02/2011 11:12 AM, Rafa Griman wrote: > >> Are you using xorg-server-catalyst-maximize-fix? I was and the latest >> update left my kbd and mouse unuseable under X. Solution was to >> uninstall it and install normal xorg: >> >> >> htt

Re: [arch-general] Why are financial contributions not accepted?

2011/5/1 Cédric Girard > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Seblu wrote: > > > What about create a association elsewhere in the world where it can be > > less expensive? > > > > In France, we have an "association law 1901" > > (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_loi_de_1901) which allow a > >

[arch-general] broken suspend - blank screen

Hi guys, sorry to spam the list, but this bug renders my ntb almost unusable. Could any of you please look at the bug and suggest some further steps? https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=24029 Thank you, Mark -- Marek Otahal :o) signature.asc Description: This is a digit

Re: [arch-general] Dmenu vs. KMS

> Same here with x86-video-ati-6.14.1 and HD4670, but I don't normally use such > long > lines with dmenu. > > I wonder whether anyone else has missed this delay, because you didn't > describe what you see in your first message. Yeah, my mistake. With short lines everything's ok.

Re: [arch-general] What broke?!?!?!?

On 05/02/2011 11:12 AM, Rafa Griman wrote: Are you using xorg-server-catalyst-maximize-fix? I was and the latest update left my kbd and mouse unuseable under X. Solution was to uninstall it and install normal xorg: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ATI_Catalyst#Catalyst.27s_repositories # pa

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3, a bug?

On 2 May 2011 17:03, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 05/02/2011 07:01 PM, Aljosha Papsch wrote: > >>> >>> /M >> >> It's a design pattern of the GNOME Shell. Switching between windows work >> application based, not window based. Which means, if a Webbrowser is opened >> and two Shells, you won't switch betw

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3, a bug?

On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 05:01:43PM +0100, Aljosha Papsch wrote: > >This is such a basic issue that I refuse to believe I'm the first to > > >bump into this behaviour.  Hence I ask here first for some help. > > > >I recently upgraded to Gnome3 and switching between windows with > >alt+tab is rather

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3, a bug?

On 05/02/2011 07:01 PM, Aljosha Papsch wrote: /M It's a design pattern of the GNOME Shell. Switching between windows work application based, not window based. Which means, if a Webbrowser is opened and two Shells, you won't switch between the shells but between Firefox and the last focused

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3, a bug?

>This is such a basic issue that I refuse to believe I'm the first to >bump into this behaviour.  Hence I ask here first for some help. > >I recently upgraded to Gnome3 and switching between windows with >alt+tab is rather broken for me.  Here's why I say that: > >1. I make sure I have two non-ove

[arch-general] Gnome 3, a bug?

This is such a basic issue that I refuse to believe I'm the first to bump into this behaviour. Hence I ask here first for some help. I recently upgraded to Gnome3 and switching between windows with alt+tab is rather broken for me. Here's why I say that: 1. I make sure I have two non-overlapping

Re: [arch-general] What broke?!?!?!?

David Rosenstrauch wrote: > > * Connecting to an openvpn no longer works under > networkmanager/networkmanager-openvpn/nm-applet. Maybe this: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24006

Re: [arch-general] What broke?!?!?!?

Hi :) On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote: > OK, performed a pacman -Syu today, and all sorts of things broke.  Can > anyone please help point me to fixes? > > * My USB (wireless) keyboard no longer works under X.  (Although it still > works fine from consoles 1-6.) > > * Int

[arch-general] What broke?!?!?!?

OK, performed a pacman -Syu today, and all sorts of things broke. Can anyone please help point me to fixes? * My USB (wireless) keyboard no longer works under X. (Although it still works fine from consoles 1-6.) * Internal trackpad no longer works under X. * Connecting to an openvpn no lon

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts-2011.04.1-2

On 05/02/2011 09:48 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 02.05.2011 14:43, schrieb Tom Gundersen: On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 29.04.2011 02:33, schrieb Tom Gundersen: Hi guys, A new initscripts package is in testing, please test and signoff. The only change since -1 is

Re: [arch-general] Status of dcron

On Sun, 1 May 2011 21:43:42 -0400, Jim Pryor wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 04:06:47AM +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> Jim Pryor wrote: >> > v4.5 was released as a tarball at >> > ; but Paul won't be able to >> > package it right away. >> > >> Pierr

Re: [arch-general] Status of dcron

On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:19:36AM +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Sunday 01 May 2011 21:43:42 Jim Pryor wrote: > > I suggest these changes: > > > > --- PKGBUILD2011-05-01 21:30:00.046676526 -0400 > > +++ PKGBUILD.new2011-05-01 21:35:10.066676512 -0400 > > @@ -38,5 +38,8 @@ > > inst