Am Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:55:32 +0300
schrieb Grigorios Bouzakis :
> Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 20:45:32 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> >> This feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23747
> >>
> >>
> >> Greg
> >
> > Is this some sort of configuration utility for
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 20:45:32 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> >> This feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23747
> >>
> >>
> >> Greg
> >
> > Is this some sort of configuration utility for Xorg?
Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 20:45:32 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>> This feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23747
>>
>>
>> Greg
>
> Is this some sort of configuration utility for Xorg? A little background
> would
> be nice.
>
Autocutsel is not part of the
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 20:45:32 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> This feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23747
>
>
> Greg
Is this some sort of configuration utility for Xorg? A little background would
be nice.
This feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23747
Greg
> > Has upstream accepted that patch?
>
>
> The corresponding bug report is:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=865
>
> It seems there is still some work to be done before the patch can be
> accepted upstream.
Based on my reading, the patch cannot be accepted upstream because it
vio
Upstream is aware of the issue, which occurs with version 0.90 md
arrays. The latest git version fixes the problem. So it's only a
matter of waiting for a new release version from upstream for this to
trickle into the arch repos. For now I simply keep mdadm pinned on
v3.1.5, which is in fact the
>run firefox and gdb and see where the crash occurs
OK, here is the log from gdbStarting program: /usr/bin/firefox
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7fffe76bf700 (LWP 4336)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe6ab4700 (LWP 4337)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe62b3700 (LWP 4338)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe
On 04/13/2011 08:56 PM, Gordy Campbell wrote:
#0 0x in ?? ()
#1 0x745ac314 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so.0
#2 0x745bb187 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so.0
#3 0x745cb70c in ?? () from /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so.0
#4 0x745cb98b in ?? ()
>
>> On 04/13/2011 06:16 PM, Gordon Campbell wrote:
Just did a fresh install of Archlinux. The problem is when I start Firefox
nothing happens. I ran it in the terminal and it's segfaults . Can get the
safe mode box up when I run firefox -safe-mode but when it try's to start
i
On Wednesday 13 of April 2011 18:17:44 Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
> On 13 April 2011 18:10, Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
> > On 13 April 2011 18:03, Marek Otahal wrote:
> >> hi,
> >> by chance I realised that the pacdiff(viewer) utils don't notice a
> >> change in kdmrc file. This is strange as I remember
On 04/13/2011 07:29 PM, Gordy Campbell wrote:
On 04/13/2011 06:16 PM, Gordon Campbell wrote:
Just did a fresh install of Archlinux. The problem is when I start Firefox
nothing happens. I ran it in the terminal and it's segfaults . Can get the
safe mode box up when I run firefox -safe-mode but w
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 18:03 +0200, Marek Otahal wrote:
> hi,
> by chance I realised that the pacdiff(viewer) utils don't notice a change in
> kdmrc file. This is strange as I remember being notified about the
> modification on almost every kde update.
>
> By creating a /etc/rc.conf.pacnew I ver
> 04/13/2011 06:16 PM, Gordon Campbell wrote:
>>Just did a fresh install of Archlinux. The problem is when I start Firefox
>>nothing happens. I ran it in the terminal and it's segfaults . Can get the
>>safe mode box up when I run firefox -safe-mode but when it try's to start it
>>just segf
On 04/13/2011 06:16 PM, Gordon Campbell wrote:
>>Just did a fresh install of Archlinux. The problem is when I start Firefox
>>nothing happens. I ran it in the terminal and it's segfaults . Can get the
>>safe mode box up when I run firefox -safe-mode but when it try's to start it
>>just segfaults.
On 13 April 2011 18:10, Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
> On 13 April 2011 18:03, Marek Otahal wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>> by chance I realised that the pacdiff(viewer) utils don't notice a change in
>> kdmrc file. This is strange as I remember being notified about the
>> modification on almost every kde update.
On 13 April 2011 18:03, Marek Otahal wrote:
>
> hi,
> by chance I realised that the pacdiff(viewer) utils don't notice a change in
> kdmrc file. This is strange as I remember being notified about the
> modification on almost every kde update.
>
> By creating a /etc/rc.conf.pacnew I verify they wor
hi,
by chance I realised that the pacdiff(viewer) utils don't notice a change in
kdmrc file. This is strange as I remember being notified about the
modification on almost every kde update.
By creating a /etc/rc.conf.pacnew I verify they work otherwise.
So was there a change in searchpaths or s
do you use something like libtrash?
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 06:16 PM, Gordon Campbell wrote:
>>
>> Just did a fresh install of Archlinux. The problem is when I start Firefox
>> nothing happens. I ran it in the terminal and it's segfaults . Can get the
>
On 04/13/2011 06:16 PM, Gordon Campbell wrote:
Just did a fresh install of Archlinux. The problem is when I start Firefox
nothing happens. I ran it in the terminal and it's segfaults . Can get the
safe mode box up when I run firefox -safe-mode but when it try's to start it
just segfaults. Anyone
Just did a fresh install of Archlinux. The problem is when I start Firefox
nothing happens. I ran it in the terminal and it's segfaults . Can get the
safe mode box up when I run firefox -safe-mode but when it try's to start it
just segfaults. Anyone else have this problem and how can I sort this?
On 13 April 2011 23:05, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:02:04 +0200
> Øyvind Heggstad wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:30:12 + (UTC)
>> Leandro Costa via LinkedIn wrote:
>>
>> > LinkedIn
>> > Leandro Costa requested to add you as a connection on
>> > LinkedIn:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:02:04 +0200
Øyvind Heggstad wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:30:12 + (UTC)
> Leandro Costa via LinkedIn wrote:
>
> > LinkedIn
> > Leandro Costa requested to add you as a connection on
> > LinkedIn: --
> >
> > Gergely
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:30:12 + (UTC)
Leandro Costa via LinkedIn wrote:
> LinkedIn
> Leandro Costa requested to add you as a connection on
> LinkedIn: --
>
> Gergely,
>
> I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
>
> - Le
2011/4/11, Auguste Pop :
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 11/04/11 10:48, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Aaron DeVore
>>> wrote:
I recently started creating/maintaining packages for the AUR. One
request I've run up against is al
Am Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:29:17 +0300
schrieb Grigorios Bouzakis :
> As usual there is no strict policy
> about this that im aware of, but it used to avoided.
There is one. It was somewhere in the wiki, but I can't find it anymore.
Heiko
Heiko Baums wrote:
>
> And, btw., libreoffice can't depend on jre directly, because libreoffice
> is in [extra] and jre is in [community].
>
I thought the same too until i saw packages like gnucash which depend on
aqbanking which is in community:
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/aq
* Tobias Powalowski [09.04.2011 23:14]:
> xfsprogs-3.1.5 (30 March 2011)
> - Polish translation update, thanks to Jakub Bogusz
> - xfs_repair now warns if running in low memory mode
> - Phase 2 of xfs_repair is now multithreaded
> - xfs_quota no longer attempts to g
Hello, Dennis Beekman:
> Libre Office seems to depend on the openjdk6 package but this package
> doesn't support applets in firefox and therefore i use the jre & jdk
> packages instead.
As others have already told you, icedtea-web provides web browser
support for openjdk6. What the others did
> >
> > libreoffice depends on java-runtime, which is no real package.
> > java-runtine is provided by the openjdk6 and jre package, so it does
> > not matter which you use.
> >
> I suspected as much when both packages seemed to work :-)
> but can we change the Libre Office packages to depend upo
Am Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:16:30 +0200
schrieb Dennis Beekman :
> I suspected as much when both packages seemed to work :-)
> but can we change the Libre Office packages to depend upon JRE
> instead ? Openjdk6 is missing a lot of functionality such as browser
> support, JRE would be a better choice..
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Dennis Beekman wrote:
> I suspected as much when both packages seemed to work :-)
> but can we change the Libre Office packages to depend upon JRE instead ?
> Openjdk6 is missing a lot of functionality such as browser support, JRE
> would be a better choice..
>
b
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Dennis Beekman
wrote:
> I suspected as much when both packages seemed to work :-)
> but can we change the Libre Office packages to depend upon JRE instead ?
> Openjdk6 is missing a lot of functionality such as browser support, JRE
> would be a better choice..
No.
On 04/12/2011 10:01 PM, Richard Schütz wrote:
Am 12.04.2011 21:54, schrieb Dennis Beekman:
Libre Office seems to depend on the openjdk6 package but this package
doesn't support applets in firefox and therefore i use the jre & jdk
packages instead.
When i installed the latest updates wich includ
34 matches
Mail list logo
