>
> I still need to know what to do with the PKGBUILDs I have so far. I don't
> know
> if I should upload them as part of the wiki, or just provide links to them
> on
> another site. I'll create the links once I know where you guys want me to
> put
> them. I can just leave them on my server (it's n
On 01/30/2011 03:23 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> If it's a number of PKGBUILDs, place them for eg. in google code under
> a project name eg. "arch-trinity". This allows a one-stop location to
> check out everything. You can of course use an aur uploader to mass
> upload them. Or you can do both.
Thank
On Jan 31, 2011 1:15 AM, "Allan McRae" wrote:
>
> On 31/01/11 16:27, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>>
>> This is more a general question, I understand abs is updated every 24
>> hours. Would more regular updates (say, every 1 hour or so) be better?
>>
>> Currently, for those (like me) who compulsively update,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2011-01-31 11:42:56 +0100] Seblu:
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Seblu wrote:
>> > Got it. The only difference is the line added in slim.pam? Because i
>> > made some test by manually adding this line tonight, and this was not
>> > a
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 19:00 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 18:45 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> > On 31 January 2011 17:45, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > > I can't imagine a user waiting for a updated package of foo when there
> > > is a new version out and he wants to rebuild. (He jus
Excerpts from Thomas Bächler's message of So Jan 30 21:45:28 +0100 2011:
> Am 27.01.2011 14:30, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> > Am 27.01.2011 11:35, schrieb Jan Spakula:
> >>> This is weird. I think lvm2 is supposed to wait for udev to finish
> >>> creating all links before returning. Inserting a 'slee
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 18:45 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 31 January 2011 17:45, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > I can't imagine a user waiting for a updated package of foo when there
> > is a new version out and he wants to rebuild. (He just does that
> > himself)
> >
> > To rest my case, i think th
[2011-01-31 11:42:56 +0100] Seblu:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Seblu wrote:
> > Got it. The only difference is the line added in slim.pam? Because i
> > made some test by manually adding this line tonight, and this was not
> > a solution.
>
> When i make test with gdm/kdm all works perfec
On 31 January 2011 17:45, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 10:18 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Am 31.01.2011 07:27, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
>> > This is more a general question, I understand abs is updated every 24
>> > hours. Would more regular updates (say, every 1 hour or so) be be
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Seblu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>> [2011-01-31 09:50:35 +0100] Seblu:
>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>>> > If you run i686, please let me know if this package solves your issues:
>>> >
>>> >
Am 28.01.2011 22:57, schrieb Karol Babioch:
> it seems to work now, but I had to put "/dev/mapper/raid-home" in the
> fstab, instead of "/dev/raid/home". I guess its time to ask for the
> difference between those both, because I never really got it.
Both should work the same, but there is a recent
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2011-01-31 09:50:35 +0100] Seblu:
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>> > If you run i686, please let me know if this package solves your issues:
>> >
>> > http://arch.vesath.org/all/slim-1.3.2-3-i686.pkg.tar.x
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 10:18 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 31.01.2011 07:27, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
> > This is more a general question, I understand abs is updated every 24
> > hours. Would more regular updates (say, every 1 hour or so) be better?
>
> A bit off-topic: You don't have to use ABS if
Am 31.01.2011 07:27, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
> This is more a general question, I understand abs is updated every 24
> hours. Would more regular updates (say, every 1 hour or so) be better?
A bit off-topic: You don't have to use ABS if you don't need a complete
tree.
For a single package:
svn co svn:
Am 31.01.2011 09:15, schrieb Jakob Gruber:
> For some reason, I'm not getting this behavior anymore with
> lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1.
>
> I inserted the 'udevadm settle' line into rc.sysinit on the 26th as you
> suggested (which fixed the issue). On the 27th, rc.sysinit was
> overwritten by new
[2011-01-31 09:50:35 +0100] Seblu:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> > If you run i686, please let me know if this package solves your issues:
> >
> > http://arch.vesath.org/all/slim-1.3.2-3-i686.pkg.tar.xz
> >
> > Or you can compile your own package from source:
> >
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2011-01-31 08:40:37 +0100] Seblu:
>> Hello, I dug up this old thread to know if someone find a suitable
>> solution to use slim (or startx) + window manager working correctly
>> with consolekit > 0.4.1 ?
>
> I made a new package for i686 (af
On 01/30/2011 09:45 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 27.01.2011 14:30, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
Am 27.01.2011 11:35, schrieb Jan Spakula:
This is weird. I think lvm2 is supposed to wait for udev to finish
creating all links before returning. Inserting a 'sleep 1' or
'/sbin/udevadm settle' in rc.sysi
On 01/31/2011 10:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2011-01-31 08:40:37 +0100] Seblu:
Hello, I dug up this old thread to know if someone find a suitable
solution to use slim (or startx) + window manager working correctly
with consolekit> 0.4.1 ?
I made a new package for i686 (after Ionut/Foutrelis
[2011-01-31 08:40:37 +0100] Seblu:
> Hello, I dug up this old thread to know if someone find a suitable
> solution to use slim (or startx) + window manager working correctly
> with consolekit > 0.4.1 ?
I made a new package for i686 (after Ionut/Foutrelis suggested a session
pam_ck_connector.so lin
20 matches
Mail list logo
