On 12/06/10 12:43, Andreas Radke wrote:
The former ooo-build project "go-openoffice" is deprecated by
upstream developers in favor of the upcoming LibreOffice (LibO).
It's time to drop it from our repos while we are rebuilding all
OpenOffice branches for the icu-4.6 .so-bump.
Please use the van
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
>> Out of curiosity why is everyone so again just writing Javascript? Everyone
>> seems to want to write in some other language and then compile to Javascript
>> these days. --Kaiting.
>>
>> --
>> Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.co
Because writing javascript that is compatible con every mayor browser
"by hand" is a very hard work
Ignacio
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:14 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
>> the benefit to the pyjs approach is 100% client side operation, so it
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> You reminded me of a comment on reddit:
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/cf8cv/extjs_to_add_more_confusion_to_developers_changes/c0s6tah
>
Funny comment, but whoever wrote it is an idiot and needs to RTFM. In terms
of epi
Am 14.12.2010 19:37, schrieb Dave Reisner:
> It is worth noting, however, that the upstream for iana-etc seems to
> have disappeared. As to why Arch took these files from an intermediary
> I'm not sure, but they appear to have been taken from iana itself:
>
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-n
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:44 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
>> ) JS is completely unstructured. powerful, but causes developers to
>> implement many things that would be a part of the core syntax in other
>> langs
>> ) the causes many d
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:44 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> ) JS is completely unstructured. powerful, but causes developers to
> implement many things that would be a part of the core syntax in other
> langs
> ) the causes many different impls of the same, and new devs to
> misuse the real
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:14 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
>> the benefit to the pyjs approach is 100% client side operation, so it
>> can run without online access. additionally, the python-DOM version
>> (or the pyjs version if proxying t
El 14/12/10 01:14, C Anthony Risinger dijo:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Tomás Acauan Schertel
> wrote:
> > You've done a great job Anthony. Your app is a all-in-one!
> > Our focus is (was) create a better AUR, with new features and using
> > other platform (from php to django). I think you
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:14 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> the benefit to the pyjs approach is 100% client side operation, so it
> can run without online access. additionally, the python-DOM version
> (or the pyjs version if proxying thru a local daemon) could
> potentially direct install from
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Tomás Acauan Schertel
wrote:
> You've done a great job Anthony. Your app is a all-in-one!
> Our focus is (was) create a better AUR, with new features and using
> other platform (from php to django). I think your focus is a little
> different, isn't?
well, the imm
You've done a great job Anthony. Your app is a all-in-one!
Our focus is (was) create a better AUR, with new features and using
other platform (from php to django). I think your focus is a little
different, isn't?
--
Tomás A. Schertel
--
Linux Registered
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 19:25:11 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 14.12.2010 19:02, schrieb Jesse Young:
> > Hopefully I'm not too late. But I think you should know that filesystem
> > depends on iana-etc, which is not in the base group, nor is it on the
> > core install CD. What I would do is to
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:25:11PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 14.12.2010 19:02, schrieb Jesse Young:
> > Hopefully I'm not too late. But I think you should know that filesystem
> > depends on iana-etc, which is not in the base group, nor is it on the
> > core install CD. What I would do is t
Am 14.12.2010 19:02, schrieb Jesse Young:
> Hopefully I'm not too late. But I think you should know that filesystem
> depends on iana-etc, which is not in the base group, nor is it on the
> core install CD. What I would do is to add iana-etc to base/core ISO,
> which should not hold up this signoff
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:12 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>> * git://ius.student.utwente.nl/aur2 -- Thralas's repository
>>> * git://git.berlios.de/aur2 -- Djszapi's repository
>>> * git://github.com/SpeedVin/aur2.git -- SpeedVin's AUR2
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> * git://ius.student.utwente.nl/aur2 -- Thralas's repository
>> * git://git.berlios.de/aur2 -- Djszapi's repository
>> * git://github.com/SpeedVin/aur2.git -- SpeedVin's AUR2 forked repo
>> with some patches and translation's.
>
> I'll add "
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 08:21:41 +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Morning,
>
> this is a minor update to the filesystem package and I hope we can
> finally move it to core. Only change is:
>
> * don't check if profiles are executable; FS#22036
>
> Please sign off,
Hopefully I'm not too late. But
Thanks for your answer Allan.
We gonna start working and sending code ASAP.
--
Tomás A. Schertel
--
Linux Registered User #304838
Arch Linux User
http://www.archlinux-br.org/
--
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11
On 14/12/10 21:54, Tomás Acauan Schertel wrote:
The Brazilian Arch Linux Community wants to help Arch Linux project,
working on bug reports and feature requests.
As first task, we plan to help conclude the development of AUR version 2.
That is a big goal! But it just might be crazy enough to s
The Brazilian Arch Linux Community wants to help Arch Linux project,
working on bug reports and feature requests.
As first task, we plan to help conclude the development of AUR version 2.
We don't have lots of developers, but we really want to help. And
maybe others join us on this effort.
To acc
21 matches
Mail list logo
