Re: [arch-general] what happened to nut (network-ups-tools)?

2010-11-29 Thread David C. Rankin
On 11/29/2010 11:07 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > I'd like to encourage you to perform several searches in different > places before asking any question on the mailing list. Ideally, such > trivial questions should never be asked on the list. > > There's a really handy search engine called google (http:

Re: [arch-general] what happened to nut (network-ups-tools)?

2010-11-29 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon 29 Nov 2010 22:31 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 11/29/2010 09:11 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > > David, is it really that hard to do a few searches before asking? > > No, I did search for the package on the web-site. I just didn't think > to search AUR. I hadn't heard of packages getting kic

Re: [arch-general] what happened to nut (network-ups-tools)?

2010-11-29 Thread David C. Rankin
On 11/29/2010 09:11 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > David, is it really that hard to do a few searches before asking? No, I did search for the package on the web-site. I just didn't think to search AUR. I hadn't heard of packages getting kicked out of the package list before, so it never occurred to me to

Re: [arch-general] what happened to nut (network-ups-tools)?

2010-11-29 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon 29 Nov 2010 20:03 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: > Where did nut go? I just checked and network-ups-tools is no longer > available. Did it change names? I must have missed it. Thanks. David, is it really that hard to do a few searches before asking?

Re: [arch-general] what happened to nut (network-ups-tools)?

2010-11-29 Thread David C. Rankin
On 11/29/2010 08:08 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > It has been moved to the AUR [1] on 2010-09-21. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5379 Thank you Lukas! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Fa

Re: [arch-general] what happened to nut (network-ups-tools)?

2010-11-29 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:03:28PM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: > Where did nut go? I just checked and network-ups-tools is no longer > available. > Did it change names? I must have missed it. Thanks. It has been moved to the AUR [1] on 2010-09-21. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.p

[arch-general] what happened to nut (network-ups-tools)?

2010-11-29 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, Where did nut go? I just checked and network-ups-tools is no longer available. Did it change names? I must have missed it. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339

Re: [arch-general] Opinions on pulseaudio [WAS: PulseAudio in [testing]]

2010-11-29 Thread Sander Jansen
2010/11/29 "Jérôme M. Berger" : > Morgan Gangwere wrote: >> As well, Pulse still doesn't work on my Alienware laptop. Realtek >> chipset, hda_intel picks it up as being generic. things almost work, >> except headphones. PA will only let sound go through the front >> speakers, while ALSA just has a

Re: [arch-general] Opinions on pulseaudio [WAS: PulseAudio in [testing]]

2010-11-29 Thread Ulf Winkelvos
On 29.11.2010 23:25, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote: Morgan Gangwere wrote: As well, Pulse still doesn't work on my Alienware laptop. Realtek chipset, hda_intel picks it up as being generic. things almost work, except headphones. PA will only let sound go through the front speakers, while ALSA just ha

Re: [arch-general] Opinions on pulseaudio [WAS: PulseAudio in [testing]]

2010-11-29 Thread Jérôme M. Berger
Morgan Gangwere wrote: > As well, Pulse still doesn't work on my Alienware laptop. Realtek > chipset, hda_intel picks it up as being generic. things almost work, > except headphones. PA will only let sound go through the front > speakers, while ALSA just has a switch. Its a known WONTFIX bug, too.

[arch-general] [signoff] lilo 23.1-2

2010-11-29 Thread Andrea Scarpino
from lilo 23.1-1 - upstream release - new url - updated source - use package() function - updated make options - rebuilt to switch to tar.xz lilo 23.1-2 - fixed source - added sharutils as new makedependence - added perl as optdependence to run keytab-lilo lilo 23.1-1 was without signoff, please

Re: [arch-general] networkmanager crash

2010-11-29 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 11/29/2010 08:38 PM, Martín Cigorraga wrote: 2010/11/24 Martín Cigorraga Despite latest upgrades to networkmanager (-4 and -5) and the other KDE libraries, networkmanager is still crashing on KDE shutdown, sometimes crashing KDE itself sometimes showing a long output in the tty right before

Re: [arch-general] networkmanager crash

2010-11-29 Thread Ángel Velásquez
2010/11/29 Martín Cigorraga : > 2010/11/24 Martín Cigorraga > >> Despite latest upgrades to networkmanager (-4 and -5) and the other >> KDE libraries, networkmanager is still crashing on KDE shutdown, >> sometimes crashing KDE itself sometimes showing a long output in the >> tty right before syste

Re: [arch-general] networkmanager crash

2010-11-29 Thread Martín Cigorraga
2010/11/24 Martín Cigorraga > Despite latest upgrades to networkmanager (-4 and -5) and the other > KDE libraries, networkmanager is still crashing on KDE shutdown, > sometimes crashing KDE itself sometimes showing a long output in the > tty right before system shutdown script. > > Regards! > > 2

Re: [arch-general] associations for chromium

2010-11-29 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Hi Thomas, Excerpts from Thomas Jost's message of Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:10 +0100: > Le 29/11/2010 03:26, Sergey Manucharian a écrit : > > I wonder if somebody could already figure out how to handle file and > > protocol associations for Chromium. For those who use a DE like > > KDE/Gnome most proba

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-29 Thread Jan Steffens
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Sander Jansen wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but if pulseaudio is installed, I believe you > should be able to prevent it from starting by removing the dbus > activation files: > > etc/xdg/ > etc/xdg/autostart/ > etc/xdg/autostart/pulseaudio-kde.desktop > etc/xd

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-29 Thread Sander Jansen
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Damjan Georgievski wrote: >> I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no >> feedback on this. >> >> This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. >> >> So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running >> PulseAudio.

Re: [arch-general] Pulseaudio

2010-11-29 Thread Ulf Winkelvos
On 29.11.2010 10:21, Jan de Groot wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:09 +0100, Philipp Überbacher wrote: I guess I am one of those pulse-haters. I don't care whether it's in [extra], some other official repo or not since I simply don't need it. But now mplayer pulls in libpulse, and I have no idea

Re: [arch-general] associations for chromium

2010-11-29 Thread Thomas Jost
Le 29/11/2010 14:11, howit...@archlinux.us a écrit : > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:10:21AM +0100, Thomas Jost wrote: >> Le 29/11/2010 03:26, Sergey Manucharian a écrit : >>> I wonder if somebody could already figure out how to handle file and >>> protocol associations for Chromium. For those who use

Re: [arch-general] Opinions on pulseaudio [WAS: PulseAudio in [testing]]

2010-11-29 Thread fons
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:31:06AM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > Thanks fons, I was under the mmap alsa capability implied direct control > over the hardware's memory. It probably does in some cases (e.g. a hw: device on a PCI bus), but only to the sample data - there's no direct access to any contro

Re: [arch-general] associations for chromium

2010-11-29 Thread howitzer
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:10:21AM +0100, Thomas Jost wrote: > Le 29/11/2010 03:26, Sergey Manucharian a écrit : > > I wonder if somebody could already figure out how to handle file and > > protocol associations for Chromium. For those who use a DE like > > KDE/Gnome most probably everything works

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-29 Thread Sebastian Rust
On 28.11.2010 11:47, Χρήστος Κώτσαρης wrote: > Regarding phonon being dropped, after some googling it seems i was mistaken, > what i had read was that Qt framework is dropping phonon, not KDE. But still, > i believe it would be sane to drop phonon in KDE too and replace it with > Pulseaudio, it

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-29 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 13:21 +0100, Damjan Georgievski wrote: > > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > > feedback on this. > > > > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. > > > > So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running > > Puls

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-29 Thread Damjan Georgievski
> I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > feedback on this. > > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. > > So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running > PulseAudio. Great work Jan, it seems your updates have eliminated all the *-pu

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-29 Thread Damjan Georgievski
>> The benefit is that Flash will not f**k and lock your sound card. > > These problems are solved since years. I even made a test. Playing two > flash videos, playing music through mplayer with alsa and starting an > old game which uses oss. All this works just fine with plain alsa. No, I ment th

Re: [arch-general] Pulseaudio

2010-11-29 Thread Peter Lewis
On Monday 29 November 2010 09:21:12 Jan de Groot wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:09 +0100, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > > I guess I am one of those pulse-haters. I don't care whether it's in > > [extra], some other official repo or not since I simply don't need it. > > But now mplayer pulls in lib

Re: [arch-general] Pulseaudio

2010-11-29 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from Jan de Groot's message of 2010-11-29 10:21:12 +0100: > On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:09 +0100, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > > I guess I am one of those pulse-haters. I don't care whether it's in > > [extra], some other official repo or not since I simply don't need it. > > But now mplayer p

Re: [arch-general] archlinux hardware question

2010-11-29 Thread Ray Rashif
On 29 November 2010 05:22, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Has anyone managed to get archlinux up and running on either a sled drive or > a full-sized usb drive yet.  Another Linux system I have couldn't even > detect the disk drive was in the machine and I gave it my best hard drive > too.  Slackware has

Re: [arch-general] Pulseaudio

2010-11-29 Thread Casey Peter
On 11/28/10 23:19, Christos Kotsaris wrote: Well Morgan Gangwere since all of us Arch users understand this greatly important need to play a 13 year game on an 11 year old machine, we should rollback all changes and send pulseaudio in AUR where it belongs. I mean, we can't leave behind every ch

Re: [arch-general] Pulseaudio

2010-11-29 Thread Jan de Groot
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 17:25 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > Good luck getting pulse-haters to understand that a 1.14 MB package > isn't going to kill their system though. > > Thanks JGC for your work on this. I didn't think it was possible to > have > such choice, and it looks like you've jumped through

Re: [arch-general] Pulseaudio

2010-11-29 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:21 +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:09 +0100, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > > I guess I am one of those pulse-haters. I don't care whether it's in > > [extra], some other official repo or not since I simply don't need it. > > But now mplayer pulls in libp

Re: [arch-general] Pulseaudio

2010-11-29 Thread Jan de Groot
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:09 +0100, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > I guess I am one of those pulse-haters. I don't care whether it's in > [extra], some other official repo or not since I simply don't need it. > But now mplayer pulls in libpulse, and I have no idea which consequences > this could have.

Re: [arch-general] Pulseaudio

2010-11-29 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from christos.kotsaris's message of 2010-11-29 08:05:40 +0100: > On a more serious mode now: > > As the devs themselves said, pulseaudio is optional, unless you are using > GNOME, which requires Pulseaudio upstream. There is nothing clearer than > that. > Go blame GNOME developers. >

Re: [arch-general] associations for chromium

2010-11-29 Thread Thomas Jost
Le 29/11/2010 03:26, Sergey Manucharian a écrit : > I wonder if somebody could already figure out how to handle file and > protocol associations for Chromium. For those who use a DE like > KDE/Gnome most probably everything works out of box. There is an > article in wiki how to use chromium with no

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-29 Thread Jan Steffens
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > These problems are solved since years. I even made a test. Playing two > flash videos, playing music through mplayer with alsa and starting an > old game which uses oss. All this works just fine with plain alsa. > > -- > Pierre Schmitz, http