On 09/23/2010 05:47 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
No more experienced btrfs people here?
@shridhar, from your btrfs experience, it seems it's worth a try,
waiting for more positive feedbacks.
ive had it as / on my laptop since .31 w
On 09/23/2010 12:11 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
ah yes i forgot to mention that; i've unlcean shutdown both my laptop
and netbook more times than i can count... no issues. from the btrfs
list, most people seem to have problems with unclean power down only
when other layers/indirection are invo
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Tavian Barnes wrote:
> On 23 September 2010 11:17, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>> No more experienced btrfs people here?
>> @shridhar, from your btrfs experience, it seems it's worth a try,
>> waiting for more positive feedbacks.
>
> I've been running it / (SSD),
On 23 September 2010 11:17, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> No more experienced btrfs people here?
> @shridhar, from your btrfs experience, it seems it's worth a try,
> waiting for more positive feedbacks.
I've been running it / (SSD), /home, and /var since the beginning of
the summer on my new comp
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> No more experienced btrfs people here?
> @shridhar, from your btrfs experience, it seems it's worth a try,
> waiting for more positive feedbacks.
ive had it as / on my laptop since .31 without issue. my fiance has
it as / on her netb
"David C. Rankin" writes:
> If there is somewhere to turn for help when I run into build issues I
> can't solve, then I wouldn't mind picking up a couple of packages so
> they can be kept current. What nobody needs when trying to help is to
> be lambasted for not being able to solve those types o
I too have been using btrfs for nearly 9 months (to be precise since 18.1)
as my home
and var partition that are on one partition in differed sub-volumes. I have
never had any
problems whit it, I don't really know anythin about its speed compared to
ext4 or some
other filesystem, but its working fa
No more experienced btrfs people here?
@shridhar, from your btrfs experience, it seems it's worth a try,
waiting for more positive feedbacks.
--
Regards,
Nilesh Govindarajan
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/nilesh.gr
Twitter: http://twitter.com/nileshgr
Website: http://www.itech7.com
VPS Hosting
On 09/23/2010 08:56 AM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
2010/9/23 Cédric Girard:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Adamzyg wrote:
thank you.
if I max the glxgears window, it only ouput like below:
*118 frames in 5.0 seconds = 23.560 FPS*
*137 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.220 FPS*
*139 frames in 5.0 sec
On 14:01 Wed 22 Sep , Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
> On 09/22/2010 01:20 PM, Fess wrote:
>> On 09:18 Tue 21 Sep , Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
>>> Since the other thread is huge and hard to follow, I am creating a new
>>> thread.
>>> I would like to use this thread to talk strictly about the Local Mirror
>>
2010/9/23 Cédric Girard :
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Adamzyg wrote:
>
>> thank you.
>> if I max the glxgears window, it only ouput like below:
>>
>> *118 frames in 5.0 seconds = 23.560 FPS*
>> *137 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.220 FPS*
>> *139 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.691 FPS*
>> *139 fra
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Adamzyg wrote:
> thank you.
> if I max the glxgears window, it only ouput like below:
>
> *118 frames in 5.0 seconds = 23.560 FPS*
> *137 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.220 FPS*
> *139 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.691 FPS*
> *139 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.730 FPS*
>
>
Excerpts from Magnus Therning's message of 2010-09-23 08:08:29 +0200:
> Arch-announce resends old announcements with some regularity, though
> it's worth noting that I've never received the same mail more than
> twice.
And that part made me grin :)
On 09/23/2010 07:08 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> In my experience this is a regular one-time occurrence ;)
Now that just made me grin :p
--
Mauro Santos
thank you.
if I max the glxgears window, it only ouput like below:
*118 frames in 5.0 seconds = 23.560 FPS*
*137 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.220 FPS*
*139 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.691 FPS*
*139 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.730 FPS*
I attach my *xorg.conf* and */var/log/Xorg.0.log*, may be you can
I don't know how mailinglist apps work, but can't we put some spam
filtering to it and black list his namw or is there alredysome filtered?
what is your native language?
Maybe in that way you can understand that this kind of messages are not
welcomed in here.
For the 99 time, we don't care and stop spaming us with your
bullshit ideas
--
Ionuț
Name is filtered from now; skip inbox, send to trash. Hurray!
2010/9/23 Ng Oon-Ee
>
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:41 -0500, Myra Nelson wrote:
> >
> > One would hope this is enough to end the BS, it's getting tiring.
> >
> > Myra Nelson
>
> Did you just compare the service of highly-paid lawyers and doctors with
> voluntary time on the Arch ML? =)
>
> My observ
19 matches
Mail list logo
