Re: [arch-general] Update to 2.6.34.3-1 & LTS 2.6.32.18-1 killed dmraid box??

2010-08-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On 08/16/2010 10:17 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: After boot to the normal 2.6.34 kernel, the box kept automatically rebooting itself - WTF? So I booted to the LTS kernel, which booted this time and rebuilt the initramfs file with: /sbin/mkinitcpio -k 2.6.34-ARCH -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /bo

[arch-general] Update to 2.6.34.3-1 & LTS 2.6.32.18-1 killed dmraid box??

2010-08-16 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, This one caught me by surprise. I have my test server that I update before updating my regular server. It is based on a MSI K9N2 board (MS-7374) with a Phenom 9850 proc & 8G of ram. The box has 2 dmraid arrays: [22:00 ecstasy:/mnt/arch] # dmraid -r /dev/sdd: nvidia, "nvidia_baaccaja",

Re: [arch-general] FF Browser Tip for Archers who like a darker desktop (DR, you listening?)

2010-08-16 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Excerpts from Filip Filipov's message of Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:08 +0300: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Filip Filipov > Date: Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 18:39 > Subject: Re: [arch-general] FF Browser Tip for Archers who like a > darker desktop (DR, you listening?) > To: General Discuss

Re: [arch-general] /etc/profile PATH variable wrong

2010-08-16 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 08/16/2010 07:50 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:42:55 -0400 schrieb Matthew Monaco: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12231 I requested to re-open this bug. Heiko I didn't give the link so you could reopen it. I think the short discussion makes it clear that local will not

Re: [arch-general] /etc/profile PATH variable wrong

2010-08-16 Thread mike rosset
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:42:55 -0400 > schrieb Matthew Monaco : > >> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12231 > > I requested to re-open this bug. > > Heiko > Thank you Heiko, I'll submit the patch if the task ever gets reopened. Mike

Re: [arch-general] /etc/profile PATH variable wrong

2010-08-16 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:42:55 -0400 schrieb Matthew Monaco : > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12231 I requested to re-open this bug. Heiko

Re: [arch-general] /etc/profile PATH variable wrong

2010-08-16 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 17.08.2010 00:42, schrieb Matthew Monaco: > On 08/16/2010 09:22 AM, Heiko Baums wrote: >> Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:18:58 +1000 >> schrieb Allan McRae: >> Can also haz bug report? --> http://bugs.archlinux.org/ >>> >>> FYI, there was one a while back... It was closed as won't fix. >> >

Re: [arch-general] /etc/profile PATH variable wrong

2010-08-16 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 08/16/2010 09:22 AM, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:18:58 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae: Can also haz bug report? --> http://bugs.archlinux.org/ FYI, there was one a while back... It was closed as won't fix. Why? Heiko http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12231

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.2-1

2010-08-16 Thread Paul Ezvan
Le 15/08/2010 23:45, David C. Rankin a écrit : The kicker is temp issues are hard to chase down. Something is putting more demand on the processor in the 2.6.35 setup, but what?? Be sure to test with kernel 2.6.35.2, not previous releases. This patch [1] may reduce CPU wakeups from 2.6.35.1.

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.2-1

2010-08-16 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 08/17/2010 02:50 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: Good point on power consumption. I'll see if I can find powertop in AUR. The instrumentation on my laptop sucks - few sensors, but my best sensors are my hands. The CPU and GPU are located in the left side of my laptop and you can feel the temp ch

Re: [arch-general] FF Browser Tip for Archers who like a darker desktop (DR, you listening?)

2010-08-16 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from ms's message of 2010-08-16 22:36:45 +0200: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:29 AM, David C. Rankin > wrote: > ... > > The local file issue should be an easy fix. > ... > > Yes, just add "url-prefix(file://)" to the end of "@-moz-document" > section. In my example for Midnight Style scri

Re: [arch-general] FF Browser Tip for Archers who like a darker desktop (DR, you listening?)

2010-08-16 Thread ms
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:29 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: ... > The local file issue should be an easy fix. ... Yes, just add "url-prefix(file://)" to the end of "@-moz-document" section. In my example for Midnight Style script, @-moz-document url-prefix(http://), url-prefix(https://), url-prefix

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.2-1

2010-08-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On 08/15/2010 06:46 PM, Isaac Dupree wrote: Actually, my fan mostly didn't speed up, instead the temp (if this is real) got hotter, so I manually adjusted it up a bit (via some macbook-fan-specific mechanism), but maybe it's the same thing (macbook linux are long known to run the fan a little slo

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.2-1

2010-08-16 Thread Martín Cigorraga
> > Do you mean that 2.6.34.3 has increased fan-noise from an earlier 2.6.34 > release? 2.6.34.3 is not the same as 2.6.35.* but may have some of the same > patches... > -Isaac > Hi Isaac, exactly, fan-noise is louder now. Far beyond, If you listen my PC's case you will hear how, from time to

Re: [arch-general] FF Browser Tip for Archers who like a darker desktop (DR, you listening?)

2010-08-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On 08/16/2010 07:38 AM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: Indeed nice stuff, but... Stylish is supposed to work with Chrome, and I tried it with Chromium 5.0.375.99 - an error message "unable to open a transaction to the database" keeps popping up... Cheers, Sergey Philipp, Sergey, I hadn't tried lo

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.2-1

2010-08-16 Thread Isaac Dupree
On 08/16/10 12:55, Martín Cigorraga wrote: I'm having fan noise issue since latest kernel update. While system does run smooth, there's a notable increment of noise from the fan that seems to be running a little faster. On the other hand the videocard cooler seems to run as silent as ever. Kernel

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.2-1

2010-08-16 Thread Martín Cigorraga
I want to give my 2 cents of feedback to this issue posted in [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.2-1 : (I had the impression that it might be heating up my laptop more than normal, but then I was doing backups last night, and I'm feeling a part of my laptop that I'm not sure if it's norma

Re: [arch-general] commitpkg script than handle better splitted package

2010-08-16 Thread Laurent Carlier
Le lundi 16 août 2010 17:24:29, vous avez écrit : > Le lundi 16 août 2010 14:10:10, Dan McGee a écrit : > > Patches are a lot more likely to get looked at by any of us. And yes, > > this should probably be more than one patch. > > > > http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/ > > Hre are the pa

Re: [arch-general] commitpkg script than handle better splitted package

2010-08-16 Thread Laurent Carlier
Le lundi 16 août 2010 14:10:10, Dan McGee a écrit : > Patches are a lot more likely to get looked at by any of us. And yes, > this should probably be more than one patch. > > http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/ Hre are the patches (5), i hope i've not introduce bug while merging my chang

Re: [arch-general] /etc/profile PATH variable wrong

2010-08-16 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:18:58 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae : > > Can also haz bug report? --> http://bugs.archlinux.org/ > > > > FYI, there was one a while back... It was closed as won't fix. Why? Heiko

Re: [arch-general] FF Browser Tip for Archers who like a darker desktop (DR, you listening?)

2010-08-16 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Excerpts from Philipp Überbacher's message of Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:36 +0200: > Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of 2010-08-16 00:03:59 +0200: > > Guys, > > > > Here is a quick browser tip for firefox. About a year ago I > > stumbled across 'NightShift - Eyecare' that did a fantastic job

Re: [arch-general] commitpkg script than handle better splitted package

2010-08-16 Thread Dan McGee
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Laurent Carlier wrote: > http://pkgbuild.com/~lcarlier/communitypkg > > Currently all commands that send something to the repos are commented. > > - two seperate paths : monolithic or splitted package > - script take care when arch, pkgver, pkgrel are redefined in

[arch-general] commitpkg script than handle better splitted package

2010-08-16 Thread Laurent Carlier
http://pkgbuild.com/~lcarlier/communitypkg Currently all commands that send something to the repos are commented. - two seperate paths : monolithic or splitted package - script take care when arch, pkgver, pkgrel are redefined in package() functions - archrelease is only called for archs who nee

Re: [arch-general] /etc/profile PATH variable wrong

2010-08-16 Thread Allan McRae
On 16/08/10 21:08, Ray Rashif wrote: On 16 August 2010 15:12, mike rosset wrote: Haha. Don't be so aggressive against discussion on an issue that you brought up in the first place. We're just trying to help put things in their proper place. But yeah I agree there are too many silly tangents on

Re: [arch-general] /etc/profile PATH variable wrong

2010-08-16 Thread Ray Rashif
On 16 August 2010 15:12, mike rosset wrote: >> Haha. Don't be so aggressive against discussion on an issue that you >> brought up in the first place. We're just trying to help put things in >> their proper place. But yeah I agree there are too many silly tangents >> on this issue. So let somebody

Re: [arch-general] FF Browser Tip for Archers who like a darker desktop (DR, you listening?)

2010-08-16 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of 2010-08-16 00:03:59 +0200: > Guys, > > Here is a quick browser tip for firefox. About a year ago I stumbled > across > 'NightShift - Eyecare' that did a fantastic job at basically inverting the > way > firefox rendered pages darkening the display

Re: [arch-general] /etc/profile PATH variable wrong

2010-08-16 Thread mike rosset
> Haha. Don't be so aggressive against discussion on an issue that you > brought up in the first place. We're just trying to help put things in > their proper place. But yeah I agree there are too many silly tangents > on this issue. So let somebody submit a patch and get it over with. Ah wasn't m