Re: [arch-general] packman -S eterm [done] But: bash: eterm: command not found ????

2010-04-19 Thread Rob Bean
pacman -Ql eterm | grep bin or similar will tell you the executable name. If experience serves correctly, it's Eterm. On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Nathan Wayde wrote: > On 20/04/10 03:56, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > >> >> Could be I'm missing something here... But shouldn't 'pacman -S e

Re: [arch-general] packman -S eterm [done] But: bash: eterm: command not found ????

2010-04-19 Thread Nathan Wayde
On 20/04/10 03:56, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: Could be I'm missing something here... But shouldn't 'pacman -S eterm' put executable somewhere in the standard path??? This was done using a root shell in a konsole terminal under E17 on my recently updated Arch installation... I did search the w

[arch-general] packman -S eterm [done] But: bash: eterm: command not found ????

2010-04-19 Thread Joe(theWordy)Philbrook
Could be I'm missing something here... But shouldn't 'pacman -S eterm' put executable somewhere in the standard path??? This was done using a root shell in a konsole terminal under E17 on my recently updated Arch installation... I did search the wiki for eterm just in case there was something ab

Re: [arch-general] [arch-announce] Vim/GVim 7.2.411 Update

2010-04-19 Thread Allan McRae
On 20/04/10 00:36, José M. Prieto wrote: 2010/4/19 Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Daniel Griffiths : Daniel Griffiths wrote: Users of vim/gvim should take note! The recently released update of vim/gvim (7.2.411) introduces a few important changes. * We have moved vim/gvim to a single PKGBUILD

Re: [arch-general] [arch-announce] Vim/GVim 7.2.411 Update

2010-04-19 Thread José M . Prieto
2010/4/19 Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Daniel Griffiths : > Daniel Griffiths wrote: > > Users of vim/gvim should take note! The recently released update of vim/gvim > (7.2.411) introduces a few important changes. * We have moved vim/gvim to a > single PKGBUILD following the splitpkg format. * I