Am Sonntag 24 Januar 2010 schrieb Carlos Williams:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan
wrote:
> > The other machines you're talking about, do they too have SATA DVD-ROM
> > drives ? If yes, then try out with USB install image, provided it is
> > supported by your $1000 PC. Most
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
wrote:
> On 01/23/2010 08:01 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> On 23/01/10 20:39, Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:25:16 -0600
>>> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>>
> Did you mean ulibc?
No, not uClibc either. We're
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> I tested both patches locally and they appear to work. They are really
> tiny and straightforward so they should be safe to apply to the live dev
> site with little/no further testing.
>
> (I'm not sure who is maintaining the web interfac
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> The other machines you're talking about, do they too have SATA DVD-ROM
> drives ? If yes, then try out with USB install image, provided it is
> supported by your $1000 PC. Most modern boxes after around 2005 do.
The machines that they
On 01/24/2010 07:13 AM, Carlos Williams wrote:
Every time I try and install Arch Linux 2009.08 Netinst .ISO disk on
my newly built PC hardware, I get the following error:
Waiting for boot device...
Error: Boot device didn't show up after 30 seconds...
Falling back to interactive prompt.
You can
I looks like the best result I get from the following:
127.0.0.1localhost.localdomain localhost
127.0.0.2mail.iamghost.com mail
192.168.0.100 " "
Every time I try and install Arch Linux 2009.08 Netinst .ISO disk on
my newly built PC hardware, I get the following error:
Waiting for boot device...
Error: Boot device didn't show up after 30 seconds...
Falling back to interactive prompt.
You can try and fix the problem manually, log out when yo
The list() view was incorrectly returning from the loop that marks
ToDos as complete and thus allowing only the first ToDo to be processed.
---
todolists/views.py |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/todolists/views.py b/todolists/views.py
index 72fed16..fb03
This should fix the issue with Community-Testing packages appearing in
ToDo lists.
After this change has been applied, simply edit and save a ToDo list to
make its Community-Testing packages go away.
---
todolists/views.py |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a
I tested both patches locally and they appear to work. They are really
tiny and straightforward so they should be safe to apply to the live dev
site with little/no further testing.
(I'm not sure who is maintaining the web interface nowadays, so I'm sending the
patches to this ML.)
On 01/23/2010 08:55 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
bump to latest bugfix version.
Please signoff both arches,
Signoff x86_64
Okay, so I got smart an realized that this whole time I'd assumed that
the fault was with Arch, simply because it detected the error.
False.
Windows was set to the wrong time zone, so when I booted into it, it set
the to that time zone time, and a subsequent reboot by Arch was then
seen as th
On 01/22/2010 01:51 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
#
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost mail
10.1.1.200 mail.iamghost.com mail
I have seen multiple styles of hosts file, but I tend to set mine up
like so:
#
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain local
Hi guys,
bump to latest bugfix version.
Please signoff both arches,
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 01/23/2010 08:01 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 23/01/10 20:39, Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:25:16 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
Did you mean ulibc?
No, not uClibc either. We're actually using glibc itself. Other
distros do this as well, as it DOES add a lot of flexibility
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Carlos Williams wrote:
I have never understood Arch's approach to properly setting a FQDN on
a server. According to the Wiki...and I will quote:
There are no guarantees for the wiki, you should never expect some.
There are a lot of "experts" out there today...
The above
On 01/23/2010 09:47 AM, Sébastien Leblanc wrote:
Are you using automatic time synchronisation (NTP) on any of the
systems? This might be the problem.
Sébastien Leblanc
Yes I am. How does this have an affect?
-- Chris
On 23/01/10 20:39, Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:25:16 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
Did you mean ulibc?
No, not uClibc either. We're actually using glibc itself. Other
distros do this as well, as it DOES add a lot of flexibility
Just out of curiosity. Was eglibc considere
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:25:16 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > Did you mean ulibc?
> No, not uClibc either. We're actually using glibc itself. Other
> distros do this as well, as it DOES add a lot of flexibility
Just out of curiosity. Was eglibc considered? Why? Why not?
I can see, that maintaing
Sorry for the late reply,
RL obligations caught up with me in a pretty intrusive way :/
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:06:38 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:51:32 +0100
> Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
>
> > (..)
>
> okay so long story short, you only want the mdadm.conf updating
Are you using automatic time synchronisation (NTP) on any of the
systems? This might be the problem.
Sébastien Leblanc
Usually you set your system clock to 'localtime' for your unix install since
windows only uses localtime. If you have your unix install using gmt, then on
every reboot (at least those where the reboot occurs within a timeframe less
than your localtime offset from gmt), fsck can get called becaus
22 matches
Mail list logo
