[arch-general] Error starting vim after updates (maybe there for a while)

2009-07-24 Thread David C. Rankin
Listmates, The latest menu error was received starting vim by clicking on an attachment in kmail: Error detected while processing /usr/share/vim/vim72/menu.vim: line 155: E121: Undefined variable: paste#paste_cmd E15: Invalid expression: 'vnoremenu

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] [user] cups-1.3.11-1

2009-07-24 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:52:33 +0300 schrieb Roman Kyrylych : > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 15:39, Denis A. Altoé > Falqueto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I didn't find the original signoff message, but here is my user > > signoff for cups-1.3.11-1 in x86_64. The server starts, web > > interface is fine, pdf p

Re: [arch-general] [OT] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kbd-1.15-2

2009-07-24 Thread Sergey Manucharian
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:01:15 +0300 Roman Kyrylych wrote: > a sign == знак > a signature == підпис > to sign == підписувати > that's why translation was incorrect > sign off is even harder :-P > (as there's no word-to-word translation of "(I) sign off (this)" to > my language, but "(я) затверджую

Re: [arch-general] mpd had removed relative volume functionality.

2009-07-24 Thread Andrei Thorp
Excerpts from Dieter Plaetinck's message of Fri Jul 24 11:51:58 -0400 2009: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:36:15 -0400 > Daenyth Blank wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:50, Andrei Thorp wrote: > > > What?! That's so damn silly... why the heck would they deprecate that, > > > it's so handy? Guess

Re: [arch-general] mpd had removed relative volume functionality.

2009-07-24 Thread Andrei Thorp
Excerpts from Xavier's message of Fri Jul 24 12:23:59 -0400 2009: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:09 PM, b4283 wrote: > >> > >> do i understand this correctly: > >> you can still change the volume of mpd, but you can only specify absolute > >> values? they left out the relative setting out of the proto

Re: [arch-general] mpd had removed relative volume functionality.

2009-07-24 Thread b4283
Xavier 提到: And do you have some links / references about this? And what is the problem doing it in mpc client? consult to the mpd wiki: http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/MusicPlayerDaemonCommands#volume stating that "This is a deprecated command, is not recommended for use, and may be broken or remo

Re: [arch-general] mpd had removed relative volume functionality.

2009-07-24 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:09 PM, b4283 wrote: >> >> do i understand this correctly: >> you can still change the volume of mpd, but you can only specify absolute >> values? they left out the relative setting out of the protocol? >> >> Dieter > > Yes, this is correct. Absolute values could still be a

Re: [arch-general] mpd had removed relative volume functionality.

2009-07-24 Thread b4283
do i understand this correctly: you can still change the volume of mpd, but you can only specify absolute values? they left out the relative setting out of the protocol? Dieter Yes, this is correct. Absolute values could still be assigned, which means that in the future, the relative volume ma

Re: [arch-general] mpd had removed relative volume functionality.

2009-07-24 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:36:15 -0400 Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:50, Andrei Thorp wrote: > > What?! That's so damn silly... why the heck would they deprecate that, > > it's so handy? Guess I'll have to update my mpd frontend/library... > > Wow, that's surprising. I mean, I su

Re: [arch-general] mpd had removed relative volume functionality.

2009-07-24 Thread Andrei Thorp
Excerpts from Daenyth Blank's message of Fri Jul 24 11:36:15 -0400 2009: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:50, Andrei Thorp wrote: > > What?! That's so damn silly... why the heck would they deprecate that, > > it's so handy? Guess I'll have to update my mpd frontend/library... > > Wow, that's surprisin

Re: [arch-general] mpd had removed relative volume functionality.

2009-07-24 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:50, Andrei Thorp wrote: > What?! That's so damn silly... why the heck would they deprecate that, > it's so handy? Guess I'll have to update my mpd frontend/library... Wow, that's surprising. I mean, I suppose that they're perhaps going with mpc as a bare-bones mpd client

Re: [arch-general] mpd had removed relative volume functionality.

2009-07-24 Thread Andrei Thorp
Excerpts from b4283's message of Fri Jul 24 10:47:30 -0400 2009: > According to developer Cirrus, the relative volume adjusting method has > been deprecated for 5 years. > which is finally abandoned in the git version. (does anybody know why > mpd in the repo hasn't been updated for sometime whil

[arch-general] mpd had removed relative volume functionality.

2009-07-24 Thread b4283
According to developer Cirrus, the relative volume adjusting method has been deprecated for 5 years. which is finally abandoned in the git version. (does anybody know why mpd in the repo hasn't been updated for sometime while stable 0.15.1 is around?) So anyone who uses mpc to bind a hotkey to

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] gcc-{, libs-}4.4.1-1, libtool-2.2.6a-3

2009-07-24 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Allan McRae wrote: > Upstream update to gcc-4.4.1. Also the necessary rebuild of libtool. > > Signoff both arches. > > Allan > > > * gcc (i686) xulrunner compiles fine, looks good for me. OK gtk2 builds OK linux-2.6.30.2 (custom) OK pacman-git builds OK * gcc-libs (i686) using kde desktop thats u