On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Alper KANAT wrote:
> Hey There,
>
> I've never heard of BeagleBoard. As a user of it, have you tried playing HD?
> I really would like to have one if can play various formats of digital video
> and of course on Arch!
Apparently HD capable:
http://beagleboard.org/ha
Hi,
I just pushed device-mapper-1.02.33-1 & lvm2-2.02.48-1 in testing.
device-mapper-1.02.33-1 : minor upstream update, removed unneeded
readline depends (close FS#15205)
lvm2-2.02.48-1 : minor upstream update
Please test and signoff. Users are encouraged to signoff too as only
a few devs use t
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Alessandro Doro wrote:
> ¹ Really theoretical, assuming that the user:
> · read the PKGBUILD,
> · trust the package source.
Yeah... I think I'd be somewhat suspicious if I saw a PKGBUILD calling sudo.
sudo -k wouldn't be very effective either. What if I run sud
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 08:45:26PM -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 20:25, Alessandro Doro wrote:
> > A simple workaround could be a "sudo -k" after each sudo invocation in
> > the makepkg script.
> >
>
> I don't think there should be any such behavior added. All we do is
> fo
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 20:25, Alessandro Doro wrote:
> A simple workaround could be a "sudo -k" after each sudo invocation in
> the makepkg script.
>
I don't think there should be any such behavior added. All we do is
follow the settings the user has established -- no more and no less.
Let's not
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 03:00:49PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Square wrote:
> > I noticed this in my typical routine when installing AUR packages.
> > 'makepkg -sic' is the typical command I use, and most of the time if
> > dependencies are installed before buildi
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 14:28, Lee R. Burton wrote:
> Perhaps not needed, but could be useful, more folks complaining generally =
> faster action on the part of a mirror admin (like yours truely)... although,
> if someone comes back from vacation to an inbox full of 300 "YOUR MIRROR IS
> OUTDATED
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Aaron Griffin schrieb:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Square wrote:
>>>
>>> I noticed this in my typical routine when installing AUR packages.
>>> 'makepkg -sic' is the typical command I use, and most of the time if
>>> dependencies are
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Square wrote:
I noticed this in my typical routine when installing AUR packages. 'makepkg
-sic' is the typical command I use, and most of the time if dependencies are
installed before building sudo doesn't time out before the install - mea
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Square wrote:
> I noticed this in my typical routine when installing AUR packages. 'makepkg
> -sic' is the typical command I use, and most of the time if dependencies are
> installed before building sudo doesn't time out before the install - meaning
> I do not hav
Hi all,
It is probably trivial and I surely am the dumbest poster of the week,
but I can't use my VT's (so dim that it is unusable) after X is
started. During the boot process, VT1 is "normal" (i.e. readable).
If I boot in a non-graphical mode (init level <5) there is no problem.
If I boot in grap
I noticed this in my typical routine when installing AUR packages. 'makepkg
-sic' is the typical command I use, and most of the time if dependencies are
installed before building sudo doesn't time out before the install - meaning I
do not have to re-enter a password for installing the package it
Hey There,
I've never heard of BeagleBoard. As a user of it, have you tried playing HD?
I really would like to have one if can play various formats of digital video
and of course on Arch!
Cheers!
Alper KANAT
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 09:00, Jaime Oyarzun Knittel <
joyar...@alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl>
Perhaps not needed, but could be useful, more folks complaining generally =
faster action on the part of a mirror admin (like yours truely)... although, if
someone comes back from vacation to an inbox full of 300 "YOUR MIRROR IS
OUTDATED" messages, they might be understandably unhappy.
Might b
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 13:44, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2009, 19:17 +0200 schrieb Gerhard Brauer:
>> You also could easy check a mirror with this script:
> Could we add such a check into pacman?
I don't think that's really needed. We shouldn't have any consistantly
outdated
Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2009, 19:17 +0200 schrieb Gerhard Brauer:
> You also could easy check a mirror with this script:
Got an idea (hehe!)
Could we add such a check into pacman?
So pacman could warn if current used mirror was outdated, or a
commandline option to check the user prefered mir
Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2009, 11:54 -0400 schrieb David Rosenstrauch:
> Allan McRae wrote:
> > Such as http://users.archlinux.de/~gerbra/mirrorcheck.html
>
> Yes - exactly such as that! :-)
>
> Thanks much! Didn't even know that page existed.
You also could easy check a mirror with this scrip
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:50:50 David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> any way we could post status on a web page somewhere on
> the last time each mirror has synched
There is https://www.archlinux.de/?page=MirrorStatus You can sort the list by
last sync time etc.. There is also a list with current proble
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:54:43 -0400
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Allan McRae wrote:
> > Such as http://users.archlinux.de/~gerbra/mirrorcheck.html
>
> Yes - exactly such as that! :-)
>
> Thanks much! Didn't even know that page existed.
>
> DR
Maybe we should link to it from the main page or h
Allan McRae wrote:
Such as http://users.archlinux.de/~gerbra/mirrorcheck.html
Yes - exactly such as that! :-)
Thanks much! Didn't even know that page existed.
DR
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Gerhard Brauer wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2009, 09:27 -0400 schrieb David Rosenstrauch:
Anyone have contact info for the rit.edu mirror? It doesn't appear
to have been updated since June 30.
I have contacted on Tuesday all mirror admin from the affected US/CA/E
Cool. Thanks much, Lee.
Your mirror is great, btw. Nice and fast for us US Easterners!
DR
Lee R. Burton wrote:
Sorry, just saw this email, RIT mirror is now syncing, ... seems a lockfile got
stuck.
Feel free to give me a call next time for a more rapid response to it.
Thanks,
Lee Burton
lbu
Gerhard Brauer wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2009, 09:27 -0400 schrieb David Rosenstrauch:
Anyone have contact info for the rit.edu mirror? It doesn't appear to
have been updated since June 30.
I have contacted on Tuesday all mirror admin from the affected US/CA/EU
mirrors, which are not sy
Sorry, just saw this email, RIT mirror is now syncing, ... seems a lockfile got
stuck.
Feel free to give me a call next time for a more rapid response to it.
Thanks,
Lee Burton
lbur...@mrow.org
301 910 0246
- Original Message -
From: "Gerhard Brauer"
To: arch-general@archlinux.org
Sent:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Marco wrote:
> Edgar,
>
>> Off topic: The ~2 G size of the installed packages pacman
>> shows is complete size of all updated packages not the
>> difference between the currently installed size and the size
>> after the upgrade, right? So the complete upgrade might
>
Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2009, 09:27 -0400 schrieb David Rosenstrauch:
> Anyone have contact info for the rit.edu mirror? It doesn't appear to
> have been updated since June 30.
I have contacted on Tuesday all mirror admin from the affected US/CA/EU
mirrors, which are not synced and have all the
Edgar,
> Off topic: The ~2 G size of the installed packages pacman
> shows is complete size of all updated packages not the
> difference between the currently installed size and the size
> after the upgrade, right? So the complete upgrade might
> have worked for you.
Bad experiences have thaught
Anyone have contact info for the rit.edu mirror? It doesn't appear to
have been updated since June 30.
Thanks,
DR
Off topic: The ~2 G size of the installed packages pacman shows is complete
size of all updated packages not the difference between the currently installed
size and the size after the upgrade, right? So the complete upgrade might have
worked for you.
Sorry to interrupt the thread. ;)
Edgar
Hi Allan,
> Are you sure it was a "-Syu" and not an "-Sy" followed by installing
> something (which many people now have discovered is bad...). The readline
> and bash packages were one after the other so readline was in the [core]
> repo without base for about one second. It is unlikely any mir
Marco wrote:
Hello,
I recommend putting all dependencies in depends (including base packages),
as direct dependencies are used by pacman to order updates - i.e. a package
is upgraded after all of its dependencies. This sometimes avoids weird race
condition on updates.
However, we
Hello,
> I recommend putting all dependencies in depends (including base packages),
> as direct dependencies are used by pacman to order updates - i.e. a package
> is upgraded after all of its dependencies. This sometimes avoids weird race
> condition on updates.
> However, we usually do not put
Zé Ninguém schrieb:
Hi there.
I was wondering if base or base-devel packages should go in a package
dependency list or not?
What is the current policy about that?
I noticed that the instructions to build a clean chroot tell to install
base, base-devel and sudo, but does that means the package sh
Hi there.
I was wondering if base or base-devel packages should go in a package
dependency list or not?
What is the current policy about that?
I noticed that the instructions to build a clean chroot tell to install
base, base-devel and sudo, but does that means the package should be
expecting them
34 matches
Mail list logo
