Hi guys,
new nfs-utils package with new .install message, please signoff for both
arches.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:46 PM, prad wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:49:24 -0500
> Dan McGee wrote:
>
>> which also autocomplete
>> without having to remove the "security" of host name hashing
>>
> dan,
> i tried that too last night, but forgot to wipeout the known_hosts file.
>
> what exactly i
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 23:51:19 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2009 06:43:13 David C. Rankin wrote:
> > What do I do with all the :: Replace kdemultimedia with
> > kde-unstable/kde- meta-kdemultimedia? [Y/n] questions if I want to
> > preserve my kdemod3 install?
>
> No idea
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 06:43:13 David C. Rankin wrote:
> What do I do with all the :: Replace kdemultimedia with
> kde-unstable/kde- meta-kdemultimedia? [Y/n] questions if I want to preserve
> my kdemod3 install?
No idea why pacman asks this anyway. If you answer "no" it wont work; so j
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 23:43:13 David C. Rankin wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:51:25 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > [kde-unstable]
> > Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
>
> One more thing
>
> If I do a pacman -s -u
>
> What do I do with all the :: Replace kdemultimedia with
> kde-uns
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:49:24 -0500
Dan McGee wrote:
> which also autocomplete
> without having to remove the "security" of host name hashing
>
dan,
i tried that too last night, but forgot to wipeout the known_hosts file.
what exactly is the benefit of host name hashing? is it to prevent
other us
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:51:25 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> [kde-unstable]
> Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
One more thing
If I do a pacman -s -u
What do I do with all the :: Replace kdemultimedia with
kde-unstable/kde-
meta-kdemultimedia? [Y/n] questions if I want to preserve
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:51:25 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2009 16:39:50 David C. Rankin wrote:
> > and look for the kde-unstable repo.
> >
> > Where do I find this repo and do I need to do anything more than sync
> > against the repo holding the 4.3 packages? Thanks.
>
> Just enab
List,
Most of you know this, but it caught me off-guard. With Arch (with good
security) if you define your squirrelmail data and attachment directories
outside your document root (which you should), then you must explicitly add
the path to the parent directory of data & attachment to th
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 12:12:15 David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> David C. Rankin wrote:
> > What I am pissed at AMD/ATI for is dropping all Linux driver support
> > for all cards sold before 2007 (Everything before the 2400 series). This
> > screwed a lot of loyal ATI users over and left a real bad
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:13:55 Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 11:09 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > What I am pissed at AMD/ATI for is dropping all Linux driver
> > support
> > for all cards sold before 2007 (Everything before the 2400 series).
> > This
> > screwed a lot of
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:18 PM, prad wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:05:51 -0400
> Daenyth Blank wrote:
>
>> Additionally, you probably want to delete any hashed lines so they can
>> be regenerated later.
>>
> that did it!
>
> i tried what aaron suggested last night actually and just now, but it
Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:09 -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
>
>> Baho Utot wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any way to tell which version of gcc an executable is
>>> compiled with?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Hello :)
>>
>> Maybe can be a better way :) But this just works.
>>
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:09 -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > Is there any way to tell which version of gcc an executable is
> > compiled with?
> >
> >
> >
> Hello :)
>
> Maybe can be a better way :) But this just works.
>
> strings -a /the/file | grep -m1 GCC
>
> Good
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:09 -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > Is there any way to tell which version of gcc an executable is
> > compiled with?
> >
> >
> >
> Hello :)
>
> Maybe can be a better way :) But this just works.
>
> strings -a /the/file | grep -m1 GCC
>
> Good
Baho Utot wrote:
> Is there any way to tell which version of gcc an executable is
> compiled with?
>
>
>
Hello :)
Maybe can be a better way :) But this just works.
strings -a /the/file | grep -m1 GCC
Good Luck!
--
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 16:43 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 10:28 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Baho Utot
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 12:20 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >> >>
Did you read the whole article? It may have been working, but not
without some issues. It other words, it was not working 100%, it still
had some things lacking.
>From the article: "Once installing the patched Radeon driver, it
immediately began working with our Diamond Radeon HD 4850 (identified
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 16:43 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 10:28 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Baho Utot
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 12:20 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >> >>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 10:28 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 12:20 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Baho Utot
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On Mon
On 2009-06-17, Ricardo Hernandez wrote:
> ATI noo!!! hehe. As commented above i'm almost 100% sure you'll have
> troubles. At least in my case, ATI 4850, i cannot use X at all. ATI has no
> support for kernel 2.6.29 yet and arch have a patch for that but it does not
> work for some card, for ex
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 10:28 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 12:20 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Baho Utot
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> >> B
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:05:51 -0400
Daenyth Blank wrote:
> Additionally, you probably want to delete any hashed lines so they can
> be regenerated later.
>
that did it!
i tried what aaron suggested last night actually and just now, but it
never occurred to be that the known_hosts file was already
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 15:51, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:37 PM, prad wrote:
>> i had remote host completion:
>> ssh hostna[tab]
>> with my original debian .bashrc file.
>>
>> now with a new arch install it is gone and setting this
>> export HOSTFILE=$HOME/.hosts
>> doesn't br
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:37 PM, prad wrote:
> i had remote host completion:
> ssh hostna[tab]
> with my original debian .bashrc file.
>
> now with a new arch install it is gone and setting this
> export HOSTFILE=$HOME/.hosts
> doesn't bring it back even when i put the hostnames from /etc/hosts
> i
i had remote host completion:
ssh hostna[tab]
with my original debian .bashrc file.
now with a new arch install it is gone and setting this
export HOSTFILE=$HOME/.hosts
doesn't bring it back even when i put the hostnames from /etc/hosts
into that file.
bash-completion is there and working just fi
Well, a few issues here.
1) Video card drivers for X for mostly user mode with a couple
exceptions, the proprietary ATI and Nvidia drivers needs proprieteray
closed source kernel module in order to make full use of the card.
2) If one does not care that their card is being fully utilized (both
ou
David C. Rankin wrote:
What I am pissed at AMD/ATI for is dropping all Linux driver support
for all cards sold before 2007 (Everything before the 2400 series). This
screwed a lot of loyal ATI users over and left a real bad taste in my
mouth.
Forgive me if I'm ignorant on the specifics of
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 16:39:50 David C. Rankin wrote:
> and look for the kde-unstable repo.
>
> Where do I find this repo and do I need to do anything more than sync
> against the repo holding the 4.3 packages? Thanks.
Just enabled it in your pacman.conf:
[kde-unstable]
Include = /etc/pacman.d/
Both old and new ones. Most of the problems I've ran into are with
dual monitor setups that use compiz. I've so much wanted to go with
and opensource driver solution, but I've wasted too much time/money
researching trying. So no more. Maybe in a year of two the nouveau
drivers will have matured. La
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 11:09 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> What I am pissed at AMD/ATI for is dropping all Linux driver
> support
> for all cards sold before 2007 (Everything before the 2400 series).
> This
> screwed a lot of loyal ATI users over and left a real bad taste in my
> mouth.
Baho Utot wrote:
I have a standard solution I now employ with all ATI desktop graphics
cards
that really works well. Open the case, remove the retaining screw for the card,
remove the card, and then put an NVidia card in its place just a fast as you
can. You can use the ATI card for ta
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 12:20 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> >> Baho Utot wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:46 +1000, Allan McRae w
Ricardo Hernandez wrote:
David, indeed old ati card are well supported, new ati card are almost no
supported.
2009/6/17 David Rosenstrauch
Are you referring to old ATI cards? Or new ones?
Dunno ... I've used a number of ATI cards, and haven't had problems. I'm
currently using a laptop with
David, indeed old ati card are well supported, new ati card are almost no
supported.
2009/6/17 David Rosenstrauch
> Are you referring to old ATI cards? Or new ones?
>
> Dunno ... I've used a number of ATI cards, and haven't had problems. I'm
> currently using a laptop with a ATI Mobility Radeon
Are you referring to old ATI cards? Or new ones?
Dunno ... I've used a number of ATI cards, and haven't had problems.
I'm currently using a laptop with a ATI Mobility Radeon 9000, and a
desktop/server with a ATI Radeon 9200 SE - both without incident.
DR
Dwight Schauer wrote:
I have to agr
I have to agree, ATI is big no no if you want a decent workstation
setup. I've tried a whole lot to use ATI instead of Nvidia but it just
never pans out. I've wasted a lot of money and a whole lot of time on
ATI cards and just end up ripping the card out and putting in an
Nvidia one. I don't even u
ATI noo!!! hehe. As commented above i'm almost 100% sure you'll have
troubles. At least in my case, ATI 4850, i cannot use X at all. ATI has no
support for kernel 2.6.29 yet and arch have a patch for that but it does not
work for some card, for example my card. Xorg didn't recognize mi card eve
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:39 PM, David C. Rankin <
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 10 June 2009 09:22:55 David C. Rankin wrote:
>>
>>> Now where can I get 4.3 Beta for Arch? or at least a good
>>> howto on how to download the build dependencies need
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 09:22:55 David C. Rankin wrote:
Now where can I get 4.3 Beta for Arch? or at least a good
howto on how to download the build dependencies needed to build from
source. I'll check the wiki ;-)
Subscribe to arch-dev-public
Pierre, Thanks,
I was
David C. Rankin schrieb:
Your alternative is to use the radeonhd driver. I'm not 100% sure, but I
believe your card is supported. The radeonhd driver is really making progress
and is a very good open-Source driver. I use it with laptop running Arch. Heat
is a bit of a problem on my laptop
> RedFlag (where the heck did this come from??)
>
Hum! Ever heard of China? ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Flag_Linux
http://www.redflag-linux.com/en/about.php
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 23:21 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > I am gathering info on this new system
> >
> > I just bought a new computer ($550USD complete) as I wanted to go 64 bit
> >
> > Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P motherboard
> > AMD Phenom II X4 810 AM3 socket 2.6G
> > 8GB Hig
43 matches
Mail list logo
