Re: [arch-general] [solved] synaptics edge scrolling

2009-04-16 Thread Sergey Manucharian
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:03:04 -0600 Sergey Manucharian wrote: > Hi, > > With the current xorg-server 1.6.1-1 the vertical scrolling using the > edge of touchpad is almost unusable since it's too fast now. > > It's not possible to adjust it with both gsynaptics and > 'Option "HorizScrollDelta"'

[arch-general] synaptics edge scrolling

2009-04-16 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Hi, With the current xorg-server 1.6.1-1 the vertical scrolling using the edge of touchpad is almost unusable since it's too fast now. It's not possible to adjust it with both gsynaptics and 'Option "HorizScrollDelta"' in the xorg.conf... Thanks for ideas. My computer is ThinkPad R61. Cheers,

Re: [arch-general] thinkpad t61 and not able to adjust brightness

2009-04-16 Thread 李业
Hi, On my thinkpad T400, by default I can set LCD brightness by Fn+home/end shortcut, no need to manually set hotkeys. I have acpi package installed. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:13:15 -0400 > Adam Stokes wrote: > >> So pressing the fn home

Re: [arch-general] thinkpad t61 and not able to adjust brightness

2009-04-16 Thread Sergey Manucharian
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:13:15 -0400 Adam Stokes wrote: > So pressing the fn home/end for brightness alters : > > /proc/acpi/video/VID/LCD0/brightness > > doing an: > > echo '100' >/proc/acpi/video/VID/LCD0/brightness > > My .config for the kernel is set to: > > CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI_VIDEO=y >

[arch-general] thinkpad t61 and not able to adjust brightness

2009-04-16 Thread Adam Stokes
So pressing the fn home/end for brightness alters : /proc/acpi/video/VID/LCD0/brightness doing an: echo '100' >/proc/acpi/video/VID/LCD0/brightness My .config for the kernel is set to: CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI_VIDEO=y CONFIG_VIDEO_OUTPUT_CONTROL=m CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m lsmod shows: thinkpad_acpi

Re: [arch-general] i686 extra repo - busted?

2009-04-16 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2009/4/17 pyther : > Strangely the rss feed for updated showed only x86_64. > you should watch the full list [1] [1] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-general] i686 extra repo - busted?

2009-04-16 Thread pyther
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:32:23 +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > did you try pacman -Syy? You have a partial/incomplete database, extra > repo works. Yep, somehow my database got messed up! Strangely the rss feed for updated showed only x86_64.

Re: [arch-general] i686 extra repo - busted?

2009-04-16 Thread Andrea Scarpino
did you try pacman -Syy? You have a partial/incomplete database, extra repo works. -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-general] i686 extra repo - busted?

2009-04-16 Thread pyther
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:25:52 -0500, Jeffrey Parke wrote: > pyther wrote: >> I'm guessing something is wrong with the extra repo on i686! Did Allan >> break it? >> I tried three different mirrors including ftp.archlinux.org >> >> R2D2:~ $ sudo pacman -Sl extra >> extra 3ddesktop 0.2.9-3 >> extra a

Re: [arch-general] i686 extra repo - busted?

2009-04-16 Thread Jeffrey Parke
pyther wrote: I'm guessing something is wrong with the extra repo on i686! Did Allan break it? I tried three different mirrors including ftp.archlinux.org R2D2:~ $ sudo pacman -Sl extra extra 3ddesktop 0.2.9-3 extra a2ps 4.14-1 extra a52dec 0.7.4-4 extra aalib 1.4rc5-6 extra abcde 2.3.99.7-1 ext

[arch-general] i686 extra repo - busted?

2009-04-16 Thread pyther
I'm guessing something is wrong with the extra repo on i686! Did Allan break it? I tried three different mirrors including ftp.archlinux.org R2D2:~ $ sudo pacman -Sl extra extra 3ddesktop 0.2.9-3 extra a2ps 4.14-1 extra a52dec 0.7.4-4 extra aalib 1.4rc5-6 extra abcde 2.3.99.7-1 extra abiword 2.6.

Re: [arch-general] Understanding permissions

2009-04-16 Thread ludovic coues
I've just tried to ls my home folder from an foo account. Doesn't work. So I was wrong. Need more try and fail learning =p

Re: [arch-general] Understanding permissions

2009-04-16 Thread slubman
On 16 avr. 09, at 22:47, slubman wrote: On 16 avr. 09, at 22:21, ludovic coues wrote: I'm pretty sure that +x is not set for everybody in home. Just cause you don't want that anybody can see what folder you have. If you want have have a pokemon subfolder of anime, nobody else need to now thi

Re: [arch-general] Understanding permissions

2009-04-16 Thread slubman
On 16 avr. 09, at 22:21, ludovic coues wrote: I'm pretty sure that +x is not set for everybody in home. Just cause you don't want that anybody can see what folder you have. If you want have have a pokemon subfolder of anime, nobody else need to now this. So, for me, +x have not to be set. Wit

Re: [arch-general] Understanding permissions

2009-04-16 Thread ludovic coues
I'm pretty sure that +x is not set for everybody in home. Just cause you don't want that anybody can see what folder you have. If you want have have a pokemon subfolder of anime, nobody else need to now this. So, for me, +x have not to be set. But doesn't seem to be the case for my home directory.

Re: [arch-general] Understanding permissions

2009-04-16 Thread Frédéric Perrin
Le Jeudi 16 à 17:45, kludge a écrit : > Dieter Plaetinck wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:36:36 +0200 >> Johannes Held wrote: >>> Maurí­cio : stat("/home/mauricio/public_html", 0x7fffceb2dcb0) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) >>> Is your ~ r-x for others? >> >> actually only x is needed

Re: [arch-general] Understanding permissions

2009-04-16 Thread kludge
Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:36:36 +0200 > Johannes Held wrote: > >> Maurí­cio : >>> stat("/home/mauricio/public_html", 0x7fffceb2dcb0) = -1 EACCES >>> (Permission denied) >> Is your ~ r-x for others? >> >> > > actually only x is needed to traverse directories. and, iirc, if

Re: [arch-general] network WTF

2009-04-16 Thread David Rosenstrauch
Guus Snijders wrote: It looks like there is a pam module pam_cap which can be used to set roles on users, but i havent checked if Arch has it. Some info i found: man 7 capabilities http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2008/02/18/capabilties-and-pam http://www.friedhoff.org/posixfilecaps.html Especially sec

Re: [arch-general] Understanding permissions

2009-04-16 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:36:36 +0200 Johannes Held wrote: > Maurí­cio : > > stat("/home/mauricio/public_html", 0x7fffceb2dcb0) = -1 EACCES > > (Permission denied) > Is your ~ r-x for others? > > actually only x is needed to traverse directories.

Re: [arch-general] Understanding permissions

2009-04-16 Thread Johannes Held
Maurí­cio : > stat("/home/mauricio/public_html", 0x7fffceb2dcb0) = -1 EACCES (Permission > denied) Is your ~ r-x for others? -- Gruß, Johannes Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut. http://cryptocd.eduforge.org/online_version signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[arch-general] Understanding permissions

2009-04-16 Thread Maurí­cio
Hi, I'm using lighttpd as http server, and it complains about permissions when I ask for a file on my public_html directory. Using strace on lighty I get: stat("/home/mauricio/public_html", 0x7fffceb2dcb0) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) However, using ls: ls -ld public_html public_html/inde

Re: [arch-general] Corruption with new intel driver

2009-04-16 Thread Simon Braunstein
Hello, > I'm also having issues. Tried using UXA and everything works fine until I > log off: screen goes black and no response via keyboard (no ctrl+alt+Fn nor > ctrl+alt+backspace). If you are using kdm as login manager, uncomment TerminateServer=true in /usr/share/config/kdm/kdmrc can help. G

Re: [arch-general] Corruption with new intel driver

2009-04-16 Thread 李业
The new X server will automatically load dri2 if you don't explicitly define dri in load module section, and dri2 needs uxa. So if you try to use dri+uxa or dri2+exa, X server would hang up just like you described. I met the same problem last night, and this is my conclusion from Xorg.log.0. On Th

Re: [arch-general] Corruption with new intel driver

2009-04-16 Thread Rafa Griman
Hi :) On Wednesday 15 April 2009 00:56:27 Simon Braunstein wrote: > Hello, > > > Unfortunately, I am facing some screen corruptions, as seen on this > > screenshot: > > http://nbigaouette.inrs-emt.homelinux.net/linux/arch/xf86_video_intel_cor > >ru ption.png > > Same problem here. It seems using >

Re: [arch-general] Small laptops running archy?

2009-04-16 Thread Stefano Z.
All ok also on my Dell mini 9 , only the wifi card have some trouble, i must use the proprietary drivers (broadcom-wl from aur) Unfortunately this one have some issue with latest 2.6.29 kernel Other than that, great hardware. On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Maurí­cio wrote: > Hi, > > Do you