I'm using x4500 MHD with the latest X server and xf86-video-intel
driver, commented load module section in xorg.conf to leave X server
automatically do it, with KMS enabled too. It can successfully load
dri and dri2 module(seen in Xorg.log.0).
Everything seems work fine till now. Gnome with compiz
A lot has changed in X lately... GEM, DRI2, without even talking about
kms...
So many things has changed that its hard to diagnose where the problem might
be. It could even be many problems... :S
2009/4/14 Jonathan Brown
>
> what if the problem may not be the intel or nvidia drivers, but the way
Got a bit of network weirdness going on here. 2 different Arch laptops,
an old one and a new one, with completely different hardware (and also
i686 vs. x86_64), but both are completely up to date with the latest
repos. On the old (i686) one, "iwlist scan" works fine from the command
line, as
what if the problem may not be the intel or nvidia drivers, but the way all of
those drivers might be interplaying with the latest new xorg?
Because I am seeing significant slowdowns in my X environment overall with the
new xorg (I use xfce), and my use the nvidia driver.
- Original Mess
Are you talking about darcs, the distributed revision control system?
I thought 'arch' and wrote 'darcs' :)
Thanks for your report!
Maurício
Hello,
> Unfortunately, I am facing some screen corruptions, as seen on this
> screenshot:
> http://nbigaouette.inrs-emt.homelinux.net/linux/arch/xf86_video_intel_corru
>ption.png
Same problem here. It seems using
Option "AccelMethod" "UXA"
in the device section of xorg.conf solves the problem
2009/4/15 Aaron Griffin :
> That's more of a limitation of flyspray itself - only project managers
> can see that list, and project managers have capabilities to delete
> the entire list of bugs if they wanted to - so we're not going to be
> handing out manager accounts willy-nilly.
I understand. Y
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>> 2009/4/14 Aaron Griffin :
>> I get emails for these and have a "Project Manager" list in flyspray
>> listing all tasks with closure and/or reopen requests. No need to
>> assemble the list - I've just been busy recently...
>
> another thing
> 2009/4/14 Aaron Griffin :
> I get emails for these and have a "Project Manager" list in flyspray
> listing all tasks with closure and/or reopen requests. No need to
> assemble the list - I've just been busy recently...
another thing...I think Bug Wranglers should have access to that list.
--
A
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
> wrote:
>
>> This is the list of 31 task under "Arch Linux".
>>
>>
>>
> I get emails for these and have a "Project Manager" list in flyspray
> listing all tasks with closure and/or reopen requests. No need to
>
2009/4/14 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi :
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5078
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9589
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10233
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11016
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12359
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12422
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
wrote:
> This is the list of 31 task under "Arch Linux".
>
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5078
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9589
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10233
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10895
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/t
This is the list of 31 task under "Arch Linux".
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5078
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9589
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10233
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10895
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11016
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12359
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 22:51, Nicolas Bigaouette wrote:
> Hi all,
> I just fully upgraded on two of my machines. These packages related to xorg
> were updated:
>
> Unfortunately, I am facing some screen corruptions, as seen on this
> screenshot:
> http://nbigaouette.inrs-emt.homelinux.net/linux/a
Hi all,
I just fully upgraded on two of my machines. These packages related to xorg
were updated:
[2009-04-14 12:36] upgraded xf86-input-evdev (2.1.2-1 -> 2.2.1-1)
[2009-04-14 12:36] upgraded xf86-input-keyboard (1.3.2-1 -> 1.3.2-2)
[2009-04-14 12:36] upgraded xf86-input-mouse (1.3.0-1 -> 1.4.0-2)
The Arch's stock kernel (as any other kernel) will always be enough: What
this "special" kernel does is only to build used module inside the kernel,
reducing the loading time.
It's a lot of fun and you learn a lot about the linux kernel and your own
machine by doing so, but this does not diminish
Ah. Yes, knetworkmanager0.7-svn does work. It looked like it wasn't
when I tried it yesterday.
Thanks!
DR
Van de Velde Erwin wrote:
Hi,
Please try building aur/knetworkmanager0.7-svn or aurGetworkmanager-plasmoid-
svn, these work fine for me.
Greetings,
Erwin
On Tuesday 14 April 2009
Also, there is a custom Arch kernel for Eee somewhere on AUR, iirc.
It's optimized for the system and rather nifty from what I hear. My
friend tried it with great success.
-AT
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Nicolas Bigaouette
wrote:
> I have an EeePC 1000 and it works fine with Arch. It's run
I have an EeePC 1000 and it works fine with Arch. It's running KDE 4.2
without problem. You'll always need to tweak those small machines since they
are not that powerful. For example you might want a lighter DE then KDE,
like XFCE or LXDE.
Are you talking about darcs, the distributed revision contr
Hi,
Please try building aur/knetworkmanager0.7-svn or aurGetworkmanager-plasmoid-
svn, these work fine for me.
Greetings,
Erwin
On Tuesday 14 April 2009 21:13:14 David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Anyone been able to build knetworkmanager since the upgrade of
> networkmanager to v0.7? It doesn't see
Anyone been able to build knetworkmanager since the upgrade of
networkmanager to v0.7? It doesn't seem to build for me anymore:
...
In file included from knetworkmanager-devicestore.h:34,
from knetworkmanager.h:35,
from main.cpp:25,
from libkde
Hi,
Do you had any experience using darcs on these
small Eee-like notebooks? Is there someone I
should avoid? Do you think those which come with
Linux instaled are always sure to run any Linux
distro?
Thanks,
Maurício
Tomás Acauan Schertel wrote:
What kind of problem with sound are you having?
I use the same module, and all I got is a continuous "s" for a
while.
--
Tomás A. Schertel
Actually, I think I finally just solved it! (Woo hoo!) What a relief
Symptom was basically ... no sound at
What kind of problem with sound are you having?
I use the same module, and all I got is a continuous "s" for a
while.
--
Tomás A. Schertel
http://tomas.archlinux-br.org/
--
Linux Registered User #304838
Arch Linux User
http://www.archlinux-br
My sound module's (snd-hda-intel) been broken in ALSA for a while now.
Was working around the problem by keeping myself on kernel 2.6.27, but
finally gave that up this week (for various reasons) and now I'm without
sound again.
Tried using OSS instead, but that didn't work either (no headphone
25 matches
Mail list logo
