On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Hugo Doria wrote:
>> Fixing FS#12071. Added a daemon, a .install and a user and group
>>
>> -- Hugo
>>
>
> Why are you sending signoffs for packages in extra?
> Theres no need to. The same applies to li
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Hugo Doria wrote:
> Fixing FS#12071. Added a daemon, a .install and a user and group
>
> -- Hugo
>
Why are you sending signoffs for packages in extra?
Theres no need to. The same applies to libedit as well..
--
Greg
--
Greg
Baho Utot wrote:
Getting the following error building acl-2.2.47 in chroot
using devtools
== doc ===
/bin/gzip --best -c < CHANGES > CHANGES.gz
=== po ===
/usr/bin/msgfmt -o de.mo de.po
/usr/bin/msgfmt: error while loading shared libraries:
libcroco-0.6.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No
Getting the following error building acl-2.2.47 in chroot
using devtools
== doc ===
/bin/gzip --best -c < CHANGES > CHANGES.gz
=== po ===
/usr/bin/msgfmt -o de.mo de.po
/usr/bin/msgfmt: error while loading shared libraries:
libcroco-0.6.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or direc
Compiz isn't really gnome-specific, afaik. It just so happens that
it's most popularized by Gnome-based distros and there is a nice GTK
frontend for the configuration.
As such, since you can use Compiz with KDE/XFCE, it makes some sense
that compiz would have gnome compatability. I'm not sure to w
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
I am testing using the devtools scripts
I created the chroot according to the developer
wiki:Building_in_a-Clean_Chroot
modified the pacman.conf as follows:
[CORE]
Server = file:///home/CORE
[EXTRA]
Server = file:///h
"That's not a bug, thats' a feature!"
Anyone know why compiz requires "Gnome compatibility"? I thought compiz was
integrated party with gnome...
From: Sentinel
To: General Discusson about Arch Linux
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 2:34:22 PM
Subject: Re: [arc
Christian Babeux wrote:
Sentinel wrote:
Hello,
after a recent update (unfortunately I could not update the system
for a while because of sickness) gnome-shortcuts do not work anymore.
If I go to System->Preferences->Keyboard Shortcuts most of the
shortcuts are entirely missing. Like the shor
Sentinel wrote:
Hello,
after a recent update (unfortunately I could not update the system for
a while because of sickness) gnome-shortcuts do not work anymore. If I
go to System->Preferences->Keyboard Shortcuts most of the shortcuts
are entirely missing. Like the shortcuts for changing deskto
Hi,
Uses the files $repo.files.tar-gz that the community/pkgtools downloads
Output both files for each repo, one sorted by package and other sorted
by packager
http://djgera.pastebin.com/f23dd3601
Can be very improved, sure!
Sample usage:
$ ./badfhs.sh usr/man/.+
[core]
Done: /tmp/core.usrman.t
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> I am testing using the devtools scripts
>
> I created the chroot according to the developer
> wiki:Building_in_a-Clean_Chroot
>
> modified the pacman.conf as follows:
>
> [CORE]
> Server = file:///home/CORE
>
> [EXTRA]
> Server = file:///home/EXT
Markus Krell (2009-03-21 15:42):
> Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> In most cases the problem is somewhere in your user configuration. Try
>> to move ~/.mozilla somewhere else in order to see if it still crashes
>> with a clean config.
>
> Tried this, but firefox still segfaults after browsing trough a f
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
In most cases the problem is somewhere in your user configuration. Try to move
~/.mozilla somewhere else in order to see if it still crashes with a clean
config.
Tried this, but firefox still segfaults after browsing trough a few sites.
Alessandro Doro wrote:
> Try this:
Try this:
http://www.nabble.com/-Cooker--Acroread-problem-solved-to12261537.html#a12261537
Am Samstag, 21. März 2009 15:15:39 schrieb Markus Krell:
> I dont know what to do now
In most cases the problem is somewhere in your user configuration. Try to move
~/.mozilla somewhere else in order to see if it still crashes with a clean
config.
--
Pierre Schmitz
Clemens-August-Straße 76
Alessandro Doro wrote:
Try to change gtk/gnome theme to something not using the murrine engine.
Tip: next time
$ LANG=C your command
Yes thanks, LANG=C is a good hint.
I changed the theme, but this didnt change anything. Still getting:
Xlib: extension "RANDR" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 02:59:12PM +0100, Markus Krell wrote:
> 139 mar...@zoidberg ~ % firefox
> Xlib: extension "RANDR" missing on display ":0.0".
> Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
> Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
> Xli
It's strange, firefox shouldn't detache from the console. Check if there
is any running firefox instance.
And have a look at ~/.xsession-errors.
Ok you were right, firefox does not detach from console. I just caught
this output.
--
139 mar...@zoidberg
Did you try with firefox -safe-mode?
Jep tested it right now, still those crashes after a maximum runtime of
1 Minute.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 02:36:33PM +0100, Markus Krell wrote:
> Launched from shell, firefox detaches directly, so i dont know where to
> look first.
It's strange, firefox shouldn't detache from the console. Check if there
is any running firefox instance.
And have a look at ~/.xsession-errors.
2009/3/21 Markus Krell :
> Hi arch users out there,
>
> since a few weeks, my firefox crashes permanently.
> I disabled all three Add Ons, i had installed, but still no difference.
Did you try with firefox -safe-mode?
>
> Version is up to date: 3.0.7-1
--
Abhishek
Hi arch users out there,
since a few weeks, my firefox crashes permanently.
I disabled all three Add Ons, i had installed, but still no difference.
Really annoying, so is there any possibility to find out why firefox
crashes, often a few minutes after starting?
Launched from shell, firefox deta
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 00:42, Michael Fellinger wrote:
> There are around 140 gems that have a name starting with 'ruby-*', (`gem list
> -r ruby-`), should they become 'ruby-ruby-*'?
>
That's a good question which I don't know the answer to.
> What about naming convention for github gems?
Same a
I am testing using the devtools scripts
I created the chroot according to the developer
wiki:Building_in_a-Clean_Chroot
modified the pacman.conf as follows:
[CORE]
Server = file:///home/CORE
[EXTRA]
Server = file:///home/EXTRA
these point inside the chroot
I built bcm43xx-fwcutter as a tes
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:31:46 +0530
Abhishek Dasgupta wrote:
> 2009/3/21 Daenyth Blank :
> > I've made a draft of some packaging guidelines for ruby gems; anyone
> > care to comment or expand them?
> >
> > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ruby_Gem_Package_Guidelines
> >
>
> Since ruby gems alr
2009/3/21 Daenyth Blank :
> I've made a draft of some packaging guidelines for ruby gems; anyone
> care to comment or expand them?
>
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ruby_Gem_Package_Guidelines
>
Since ruby gems already have a specification file at
http://gems.rubyforge.org/yaml
I made a gem
Thank you! =)
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Firmicus wrote:
> Henri Häkkinen a écrit :
> > Hello.
> >
> > I have some problems with installing LaTeX. Here is the output of `pacman
> -S
> > texlive-core`:
> >
> > :: Retrieving packages from extra...
> > t1lib-5.1.2-2-i686 838.9K 87.9
Henri Häkkinen a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> I have some problems with installing LaTeX. Here is the output of `pacman -S
> texlive-core`:
>
> :: Retrieving packages from extra...
> t1lib-5.1.2-2-i686 838.9K 87.9K/s 00:00:10 [#]
> 100%
> gd-2.0.35-1 175.9K 52.8
Hello.
I have some problems with installing LaTeX. Here is the output of `pacman -S
texlive-core`:
:: Retrieving packages from extra...
t1lib-5.1.2-2-i686 838.9K 87.9K/s 00:00:10 [#]
100%
gd-2.0.35-1 175.9K 52.8K/s 00:00:03 [#]
100%
29 matches
Mail list logo
