Preston C. wrote:
I think that this is a simple question. How do I mount an external
hard drive before I log into my desktop? Thanks
You have been asking all these newbie questions while these have been widely
covered by The Internets. I suggest you use an Internet Search Machine like
googl
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 00:39 -0500, Preston C. wrote:
> Got it! It was /sdc . Thanks.
You can also run "fdisk -l" as root to check your partitions.
Got it! It was /sdc . Thanks.
Ok, am about to try "mount /dev/sdb /media/disk . Thanks a lot for the
help Leonid. Hope this works, :-).
Yes, it is typical that USB external drives are /dev/sdb or /dev/sdb1
(the number at the end indicates the partition number, generally).
Thanks guys. I think I got it down. The only question I have is that I
think, not sure though, that the usb external hdd is on /sdb ? I ran
cat /proc/partitions and it gave me a pretty good bit of results, hard
to tell which one is the external hdd. Any other way to check this?
> denotes a comment, which means that everything before it and the end
> of the line is ignored. So
I'm sorry, I meant that everything *between* it [the # sign] and the
end of the line is ignored.
--
Leonid
Hi Preston,
Basically, you should think of mounting a file system as placing it
under some "root" in your larger file system. In this case, /dev/sdXY
can be thought of as a representation of the file system you want to
mount (the one on the external HD). You can place it anywhere you
want, and tha
> and login
>
> $ cat /proc/partitions #idenitfy the partition, is usually one of the
> last ones, lets assume it is /dev/sdXY
>
> $ sudo mount /dev/sdXY /path/to/mount/point
>
> $ exit
>
> to go back to your login manager
>
> Not sure what kind of answer you were looking for.
>
That is t
and login
$ cat /proc/partitions #idenitfy the partition, is usually one of the
last ones, lets assume it is /dev/sdXY
$ sudo mount /dev/sdXY /path/to/mount/point
$ exit
to go back to your login manager
Not sure what kind of answer you were looking for.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:55
I think that this is a simple question. How do I mount an external
hard drive before I log into my desktop? Thanks
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
>
>
>> Now i tested the latest alpha version of cdrecord (
>> cdrtools-2.01.01a57.tar.gz ) and its work perfect without the DMA problem.
>> The version that failed was <= cdrtools-2.01.01a55.tar.gz, with these
>> versions i need to set ve
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:46:19PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
> Nicolas Bigaouette wrote:
>> I totally second that. It is really frustrating as a bug reporting user to
>> end the discussion like this.
>> It really looks like a "shut-up and stop annoying us" thing...
>>
>> I know it did not gave me th
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:46:19PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
> Nicolas Bigaouette wrote:
>> I totally second that. It is really frustrating as a bug reporting user to
>> end the discussion like this.
>> It really looks like a "shut-up and stop annoying us" thing...
>>
>> I know it did not gave me the
Allan McRae wrote:
> Leslie P. Polzer wrote:
>> I've noticed that the Arch Haskell community has made astonishing
>> progress with their packages.
>>
>> I think it would be nice to have the same for Common Lisp.
>>
>> Would anyone be interested in devising a packaging system
>> that works with mult
Nicolas Bigaouette wrote:
I totally second that. It is really frustrating as a bug reporting user to
end the discussion like this.
It really looks like a "shut-up and stop annoying us" thing...
I know it did not gave me the motivation to open other bugs.
I don't see why the discussion should be
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
Actually, I kinda don't have that option. I still seriously don't
understand what this is about. Your bug was not a bug. Period.
>>>
>>> That bug is not the single event that prompted me to write this mail.
>>> It has happened a
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
Actually, I kinda don't have that option. I still seriously don't
understand what this is about. Your bug was not a bug. Period.
>>>
>>> That bug is not the single event that prompted me to write this mail.
>>> It has happened a
>>> Actually, I kinda don't have that option. I still seriously don't
>>> understand what this is about. Your bug was not a bug. Period.
>>
>> That bug is not the single event that prompted me to write this mail.
>> It has happened a lot.
>> So let's focus on the main issue.
>
> Then convince me -
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
>> Actually, I kinda don't have that option. I still seriously don't
>> understand what this is about. Your bug was not a bug. Period.
>
> That bug is not the single event that prompted me to write this mail.
> It has happened a lot.
> So
> Actually, I kinda don't have that option. I still seriously don't
> understand what this is about. Your bug was not a bug. Period.
That bug is not the single event that prompted me to write this mail.
It has happened a lot.
So let's focus on the main issue.
> If you think the man page is wrong,
Hmm..
it looks like, this was a temporary success.
I tried with the package from testing, but it's the same... :-/
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Sonntag 15 Februar 2009 schrieb Avramucz Péter:
>> hmmm... building ndiswrapper 1.54 vanilla works.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Geoffroy Carrier
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 17:23, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
>> Sometimes you just have useful information that would interest the
>> original poster, the people who helped him out and/or anyone who reads
>> the ticket afterwards because he has
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
>>> Sometimes you just have useful information that would interest the
>>> original poster, the people who helped him out and/or anyone who reads
>>> the ticket afterwards because he has the same problem.
>>
>> True but leaving comments o
>> Sometimes you just have useful information that would interest the
>> original poster, the people who helped him out and/or anyone who reads
>> the ticket afterwards because he has the same problem.
>
> True but leaving comments open means more emails. As one who is
> actually assigned to a lot
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:48:16 -0600
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Xavier wrote:
>> > Either you want to add information for justifying the cllosed bug,
>> > and in this case it's not a big deal since you ba
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 17:23, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> Sometimes you just have useful information that would interest the
> original poster, the people who helped him out and/or anyone who reads
> the ticket afterwards because he has the same problem.
I'd agree with that.
A bug can be closed be
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:48:16 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Xavier wrote:
> > Either you want to add information for justifying the cllosed bug,
> > and in this case it's not a big deal since you basically agree that
> > the bug should be closed. (I understand it c
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Xavier wrote:
> Either you want to add information for justifying the cllosed bug, and
> in this case it's not a big deal since you basically agree that the
> bug should be closed. (I understand it can be a bit annoying in some
> cases though :))
> Or you want to a
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:30:47 +0100
RedShift wrote:
> Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > I find it pretty frustrating that once bugs are closed in
> > http://bugs.archlinux.org/ you can no longer add comments.
> > The only option you have is request re-opening of the bug, which, I
> > guess, would then
Damjan Georgievski wrote:
I find it pretty frustrating that once bugs are closed in
http://bugs.archlinux.org/ you can no longer add comments.
The only option you have is request re-opening of the bug, which, I
guess, would then frustrate the maintainer who closed the bug.
Adding comments to alr
Leslie P. Polzer wrote:
I've noticed that the Arch Haskell community has made astonishing
progress with their packages.
I think it would be nice to have the same for Common Lisp.
Would anyone be interested in devising a packaging system
that works with multiple Lisps?
There is this wiki pa
hey, sorry, I just found how to, I will give the explanation if
someone else need it:
1. start bluetoothd
2. run this command: bluez-simple-agent hci0 00:00:00:00:00
(hci0 is the device id and 00:00:00 is the headset mac adress), the
headset must be in pairing mode
3. enjoy
I mostly use command l
Either you want to add information for justifying the cllosed bug, and
in this case it's not a big deal since you basically agree that the
bug should be closed. (I understand it can be a bit annoying in some
cases though :))
Or you want to add information against the closing of the bug : in
this ca
34 matches
Mail list logo
