Daenyth Blank wrote:
Speaking of architecture-independent packages, do we have an x86_64 build
machine?
gcarrier has graciously offered his machine for building. Contact him.
Thanks for the update Daenyth! Will do.
--
Your Fortune...
---
There comes a time in the affairs o
On 11/30/08, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 16:29 -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>> Also, the server flag:
>>
>> Option "AutoAddDevices" "False"
>>
>> Doesn't help getting this solved...
>
> Input devices have nothing to do with video devices.
> I think it's a conflic
I've talking about this for a long time.
Here it is, a x86_64 build (virtual) machine for every dev and TU who needs one.
So please drop me an E-mail with your desired login and a ssh public key.
If you don't have a ssh keypair:
ssh-keygen -t rsa
Then the public key is in $HOME/.ssh/id_rsa.pub
Eve
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> If anyone has a setup that he needed input hotplugging for, I'd be very
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If anyone has a setup that he needed input hotplugging for, I'd be very
>> interested to hear, because I cannot think of one.
>
> Hah, thanks Tho
> Speaking of architecture-independent packages, do we have an x86_64 build
> machine?
gcarrier has graciously offered his machine for building. Contact him.
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Johannes Held schrieb:
David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ah - figured it out: evdev kernel module wasn't being automatically
loaded in my rc.conf.
The X server runs as root, so it should be
I completely agree you can hardly call this hotplugging anyway as I had to
configure my touchpad in the obscure hal fdi file :(
Hotplugging is there to make life easier, not harder I thought...
Greetings,
Erwin
On Monday 01 December 2008 18:08:23 Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Hah, thanks Thomas, I
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johannes Held schrieb:
>>
>> David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> Ah - figured it out: evdev kernel module wasn't being automatically
>>> loaded in my rc.conf.
>
> The X server runs as root, so it should be cap
Thomas Bächler wrote:
1) With the kbd driver, all keyboards are picked up automatically.
Okay, they all have the same layout, but can you assign different
layouts with input hotplugging (if so, it might actually be useful).
Yep, you can do matching on properties, brand name, type etc and spe
Johannes Held schrieb:
David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ah - figured it out: evdev kernel module wasn't being automatically
loaded in my rc.conf.
The X server runs as root, so it should be capable of loading evdev
(although I think udev should autoload it).
Sorry for the noise.
Th
David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ah - figured it out: evdev kernel module wasn't being automatically
> loaded in my rc.conf.
>
> Sorry for the noise.
That's no noise!
That could be my solution too. Atm, I disabled the automatic search via
ServerFlags - just three seconds before I went m
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
André Ramaciotti wrote:
Do you have hal running when you start X? (/etc/rc.d/hal start)
Yes.
But it looks as if hal is somehow not picking up any evdev/x11 input
devices:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10osvendor]$ hal-device | grep input
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10osvendor]$
WTF?!?
André Ramaciotti wrote:
Do you have hal running when you start X? (/etc/rc.d/hal start)
Yes.
But it looks as if hal is somehow not picking up any evdev/x11 input
devices:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10osvendor]$ hal-device | grep input
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10osvendor]$
WTF?!?!?
Tnx,
DR
Aaron Griffin a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 14:10 +0300, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
you are
knowing the lack of resources, why you don't proposed to move your
pkgs which have a small use to unsupported (i think 20% of
Do you have hal running when you start X? (/etc/rc.d/hal start)
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:11 PM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Having major probs after the upgrade to the latest X w/hotplugging.
>
> X starts, but keyboard and mouse are dead. The wiki page is really vague -
> I'm
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 14:10 +0300, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
you are
knowing the lack of resources, why you don't proposed to move your
pkgs which have a small use to unsupported (i think 20% of you
Having major probs after the upgrade to the latest X w/hotplugging.
X starts, but keyboard and mouse are dead. The wiki page is really
vague - I'm not really sure what/how I'm supposed to configure to make
this work. It says I want to update the entries for things like
input.xkb.layout, inpu
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 14:10 +0300, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
>> > you are
>> > knowing the lack of resources, why you don't proposed to move your
>> > pkgs which have a small use to unsupported (i think 20% of your
>> > packages
On 11/30/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
>> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:30:09 +0100
>> Subject: [arch-general] pysol/python broken?
>> From: "Javier Vasquez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: arch-general@archlinux.org
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to run pyso
It is ok, but why replacing?
I spend ~4h per week to maintain all my packages. It is not problem to
add high voted packages to community.
To summarize the TU meetings (logs have been posted...), it is about
replacing very low usage/unused packages in [community] with those
with higher usage in
Sergej Pupykin wrote:
Disk space is not an issue at this moment, as we have expanded our disk
capacity quite a bit a few weeks ago.
I think getting architecture-independent packages up and running gives
us much more space than deleting one or two packages.
As I understand mirror traffic an
Disk space is not an issue at this moment, as we have expanded our disk
capacity quite a bit a few weeks ago.
I think getting architecture-independent packages up and running gives
us much more space than deleting one or two packages.
As I understand mirror traffic and disk space not an is
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 14:10 +0300, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> > you are
> > knowing the lack of resources, why you don't proposed to move your
> > pkgs which have a small use to unsupported (i think 20% of your
> > packages or more)?, as I said, starting just with sergej should be a
> >
> If disk s
you are
knowing the lack of resources, why you don't proposed to move your
pkgs which have a small use to unsupported (i think 20% of your
packages or more)?, as I said, starting just with sergej should be a
If disk space situation so bad, I suggest to remove flightgear and
rocksndiamons gam
you are
knowing the lack of resources, why you don't proposed to move your
pkgs which have a small use to unsupported (i think 20% of your
packages or more)?, as I said, starting just with sergej should be a
If disk space situation so bad, I suggest to remove flightgear and
rocksndiamons gam
> Secondly, your remark abo
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 30 November 2008 23:24:42 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>> Do you think its appropriate to provide all those applications as
>> binary for 2-3 people?
>
> I'm rather new to the whole Arch world,
Does the latest version of hwd, make lshwd obsolete?
lshwd returns no results conserning modules here while hwd works great.
I dont remember exactly how it used to work in the past, hadnt used it much,
but now it returns kernel modules too. Didnt lshwd take care of that
part before?
Greg
On Sunday 30 November 2008 23:24:42 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> Do you think its appropriate to provide all those applications as
> binary for 2-3 people?
I'm rather new to the whole Arch world, but I can offer the following:
Your messages to this list about Sergej sound more like personal attack
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So you didn't take the hint when I said the TUs were dealing with this...
> Packages in community, the low proportion of people who reportedly use some
> of them and how we can improve that is currently being discussed.
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
