Alper KANAT wrote:
But you still have to use ide-legacy to use Arch in Virtualbox.. :P
I was just installing an Arch box in Virtualbox on my MBP.. Second
installation though since I didn't know about ide-legacy..
Alper KANAT
http://raptiye.org
Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat yazmış:
I am happy f
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Looks like Arch is now listed as an "OS type" choice in virtualbox. Cool!
(Maybe it was already; I just noticed it today though.)
DR
yeah I noticed that when 1.6 came out. I just wonder what the tech facts
behind it are.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I rewrote stonecrest's python script which generated the Integrity
> Checks :
> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=dbscripts.git;a=blob_plain;f=cron-jobs/check_archlinux.py;hb=HEAD
> last results :
> http://www.archlinu
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Amanai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:27:32 -0700, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Amanai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there no maintaince on udev anymore?
>>>
>>
>> Could you be even more obscure
But you still have to use ide-legacy to use Arch in Virtualbox.. :P
I was just installing an Arch box in Virtualbox on my MBP.. Second
installation though since I didn't know about ide-legacy..
Alper KANAT
http://raptiye.org
Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat yazmış:
> I am happy for that too! :D
>
> On
I am happy for that too! :D
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:10 PM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like Arch is now listed as an "OS type" choice in virtualbox. Cool!
>
> (Maybe it was already; I just noticed it today though.)
>
> DR
>
>
--
Gustavo Andrés Gómez Farhat
Looks like Arch is now listed as an "OS type" choice in virtualbox. Cool!
(Maybe it was already; I just noticed it today though.)
DR
There was a recent news story about udev and how they want people to just
use the vanilla rules rather than go off naming all their devices in their
own way.
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;605162254;fp;4194304;fpid;1
C
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wouldn't say there are *exciting* changes
> (these are rare for this type of software)
> but here are the latest changes
> v125 - http://lwn.net/Articles/291028/
> v126 - http://lwn.net/Articles/292596/
>
> I think ud
2008/8/26 Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Amanai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I was just wondering, it is outdated and I didn't see any udev release
>> updates anymore. That's all.
>>
>> There is no problem with the latest version, it works.
>
> Cool, so what is
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Amanai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was just wondering, it is outdated and I didn't see any udev release
> updates anymore. That's all.
>
> There is no problem with the latest version, it works.
Cool, so what is so exciting in the latest version?
It's maintained ofcourse, although I do not believe any new release of udev
has been present the last months. I see other distros (Ubulubuntebian)
constantly updating it, but that seems to be distro-specific/internal
changes/patches mostly.
Hey, why change something that works?
-- bjorn hamra
(D
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:27:32 -0700, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Amanai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there no maintaince on udev anymore?
Could you be even more obscure?
Are you simply referring to the fact that udev 119 is outdated?
Did you at least t
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Amanai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there no maintaince on udev anymore?
>
Could you be even more obscure?
Are you simply referring to the fact that udev 119 is outdated?
Did you at least try the latest version on your system and can confirm it works?
And what
Is there no maintaince on udev anymore?
My locale is es_CO.utf8... but now I am confused... I have rebuilt the
script but now it works without the patch =)
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I had to apply this p
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had to apply this patch to actually execute the script because of my locale:
>
>
> --- check_archlinux.sh.orig 2008-08-17 15:25:04.0 -0500
> +++ check_archlinux.sh 2008-08-26 10:34:39.0 -05
I had to apply this patch to actually execute the script because of my locale:
--- check_archlinux.sh.orig 2008-08-17 15:25:04.0 -0500
+++ check_archlinux.sh 2008-08-26 10:34:39.0 -0500
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
export CARCH
cat << EOF
+# -*- coding: UTF-8 -*-
class
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think there was no rule decided. Afair we wanted to let it up to the
> maintainer if he wants to add info files and further documentation when
> he thinks it's helpful. I don't use the info command at all but could
> al
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Daenyth Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was talking with some of the other TUs, and they thought that I
should not include pkgtools in community, because it's an unofficial
tool for archlinux. I wanted to get some arch dev's opinions on
Hello,
I rewrote stonecrest's python script which generated the Integrity
Checks :
http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=dbscripts.git;a=blob_plain;f=cron-jobs/check_archlinux.py;hb=HEAD
last results :
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-August/007655.html
Main changes include :
21 matches
Mail list logo
