On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Allie Daneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well thanks a ton for your motivational speech.
Good piece of irony.
I don't understand why so many people responds so aggressively to a
simple question. ¿Can't we treat other persons a little better?
José.
Well thanks a ton for your motivational speech. It's so refreshing to
be on a Linux list that has some balls. I'm an OBSD user trying out
this Arch thingy...this is 1 more reason I like it. Next time I'll
think before I post, sorry for wasting bandwidth ;)
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:04:06 +0200
Thomas
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Abhishek Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Nigel Henry
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have Archlinux running on one machine with no problems, but the install was
>> done a while back. I've just installed it on a new machine
Allie Daneman schrieb:
Will Firefox 3 replace Firefox 2 in a future release ?
No, we will use Firefox 2 until end of all times. Firefox 3 will never
come to extra ... in fact we will go back to Firefox 1 next week, Arch
always uses the oldest and most outdated software.
If we ever brought F
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Nigel Henry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have Archlinux running on one machine with no problems, but the install was
> done a while back. I've just installed it on a new machine that I've built,
> but am having problems running pacman -Sy.
>
> The network setup i
On Wed 2008-06-18 21:39, Jeffrey Parke wrote:
> Patrick Burroughs wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 19:04, Alessio Bolognino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu 2008-06-19 08:52, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>>>
FTR, 3.0rc2 is 3.0
>>> IIRC 3.0rc3 is 3.0
>>>
>>
>> 3.0rc
someone just got owned i think
Patrick Burroughs wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 19:04, Alessio Bolognino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu 2008-06-19 08:52, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
FTR, 3.0rc2 is 3.0
IIRC 3.0rc3 is 3.0
3.0rc3 is identical to 3.0rc2 except on OS X.
~celt
Hi,
A friend of mine already maintains a package at AUR since May 03.
It's available at: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16754
There are also comments regarding the license in this page.
Best regards, Leandro Inacio
Arch Linux Brasil :: http://archlinux-br.org at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Arch
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 19:04, Alessio Bolognino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu 2008-06-19 08:52, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>> FTR, 3.0rc2 is 3.0
>
> IIRC 3.0rc3 is 3.0
3.0rc3 is identical to 3.0rc2 except on OS X.
~celti
On Thu 2008-06-19 08:52, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
> FTR, 3.0rc2 is 3.0
IIRC 3.0rc3 is 3.0
--
Alessio (molok) Bolognino
Please send personal email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Key http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xFE0270FB
GPG Key ID = 1024D / FE0270FB 2007-04-11
Key Fingerprint
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:24:50PM -0700, Allie Daneman wrote:
>> Will Firefox 3 replace Firefox 2 in a future release ?
>
> It only came out yesterday and you're already questioning whether or not
> it will be brought into extra. C
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:24:50PM -0700, Allie Daneman wrote:
>> Will Firefox 3 replace Firefox 2 in a future release ?
>
> It only came out yesterday and you're already questioning whether or not
> it will be brought into extra. C
I'm just askinggeez...
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:24:50PM -0700, Allie Daneman wrote:
>> Will Firefox 3 replace Firefox 2 in a future release ?
>
> It only came out yesterday and you're already questioning whether or not
> it will be brought into extra. C'mon! Have a little patience. Anyways
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:24:50PM -0700, Allie Daneman wrote:
> Will Firefox 3 replace Firefox 2 in a future release ?
It only came out yesterday and you're already questioning whether or not
it will be brought into extra. C'mon! Have a little patience. Anyways
you can play around with firefox3-r
Will Firefox 3 replace Firefox 2 in a future release ?
Private repos are fine, but as for an official response about Ion, see
the following:
http://archlinux.org/news/374/
// jeff
--
. : [ + carpe diem totus tuus + ] : .
I create own repo at
http://web.vrn.ru/sergej/sergej-repo/i686/
http://web.vrn.ru/sergej/sergej-repo/x86_64/
and PKGBUILDs at
http://code.google.com/p/archlinux-stuff/source/browse/trunk/my-repo
it contains ion3 stuff now
On Wed 2008-06-18 22:59, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 00:10 +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> > Hi, All!
> >
> > I forgot which decision was made about ion3
> >
> > Can I add it into community if I'll update it quickly?
>
> If you get ill (yes, getting a real life is what we call ill
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:59:33PM +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 00:10 +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> > Hi, All!
> >
> > I forgot which decision was made about ion3
> >
> > Can I add it into community if I'll update it quickly?
>
> If you get ill (yes, getting a real life is
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:10:50AM +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> Hi, All!
>
> I forgot which decision was made about ion3
>
> Can I add it into community if I'll update it quickly?
>
Its totally up to the maintainer to comply with the license. Ion was
dropped because codemac didnt want to main
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 00:10 +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> Hi, All!
>
> I forgot which decision was made about ion3
>
> Can I add it into community if I'll update it quickly?
If you get ill (yes, getting a real life is what we call ill too ;)) and
can't update the package within 2 weeks after re
Hi, All!
I forgot which decision was made about ion3
Can I add it into community if I'll update it quickly?
I have Archlinux running on one machine with no problems, but the install was
done a while back. I've just installed it on a new machine that I've built,
but am having problems running pacman -Sy.
The network setup is ok. I use static IP addresses, and everything is
correctly set. /etc/resolv.c
23 matches
Mail list logo
