On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:21 PM, gan lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do your great devs plan to add support of background running capability
> (adding @ like in the rc.conf daemon section) for netcfg2 (net-profile), I
> have set a ethernet-static and adsl internet connection when booting up, but
>
Do your great devs plan to add support of background running capability
(adding @ like in the rc.conf daemon section) for netcfg2 (net-profile), I
have set a ethernet-static and adsl internet connection when booting up, but
if adsl got some trouble to connect, which makes my computer waiting for i
Justin Gx wrote:
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
archlinux isnt ubuntu yet. You have to read the manual and set some things up
before using it. Blame me.
Do not make sick twisted jokes like that please.
It's funny: on another mailing list I keep reading about issues people
are having recentl
On Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2008 05:16 Lin, Zihui wrote:
> About the netowkr, The networking is configured in rc.conf, and I
> believe it's clean. after i swift my laptop to office, I can't
> reconfigure networking by execute "/etc/rc.d/network restart".
> :: Starting Network [BUSY]
> SIOCA
Hi!
Il Thursday 08 May 2008 20:46:57 Attila ha scritto:
> I use for a very long time labels for my partitions and i can say that this
> is a very good method to avoid problems in such cases instead there be some
> others too.
Yes I think I'm going to switch to using labels! It's really clean and
> Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
>> On Thursday 08 May 2008 05:16:15 Lin, Zihui wrote:
>>> Any solution?
>> archlinux isnt ubuntu yet. You have to read the manual and set some
>> things up before using it. Blame me.
>
> Do not make sick twisted jokes like that please.
Personally, I would not wade
On Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2008 19:13 Carotinho wrote:
> The currently running system, with the Arch-supplied 2.6.24 kernel, has the
> disk devices all mapped to a /dev/sd* scheme, even if 3 are IDE and another
> is SATA.
At first sorry that i don't answer your question and gives you instead a hint.
I
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
> On Thursday 08 May 2008 05:16:15 Lin, Zihui wrote:
>> Any solution?
> archlinux isnt ubuntu yet. You have to read the manual and set some things up
> before using it. Blame me.
Do not make sick twisted jokes like that please.
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:53:29PM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
>>> On Thursday 08 May 2008 15:58:51 bardo wrote:
>>> > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
Thanks Samed, I think I missed gdm. But if I had a good memory, Back
in 0.7.2 Gimmick, after "pacman -Sy xorg gnome" the gnome is ready to
go by adding exec gonme-session in the .xinitrc.
Arvid, Thanks for your suggestions, I do follow the wiki to setup the
netwok, and the wiki says "To test your
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Alessio Bolognino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu 2008-05-08 10:06 , Ryan Sims wrote:
>> We needn't get bogged down in another "is this the ARCH WAY?!?!"
>> conversation here;
>
> I swear I don't want to.
I believe you, I just wanted to preempt one.
>> I don't
On Thu 2008-05-08 10:06 , Ryan Sims wrote:
> We needn't get bogged down in another "is this the ARCH WAY?!?!"
> conversation here;
I swear I don't want to.
> I don't think it needs to be a policy decision. If
> neither Arch nor upstream want to deal with .desktop files (and they
> both seem to
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:53:29PM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
>> On Thursday 08 May 2008 15:58:51 bardo wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi, i
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:53:29PM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> On Thursday 08 May 2008 15:58:51 bardo wrote:
> > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi, i wanted to note that there is
> > > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Desktop_Proj
On Thursday 08 May 2008 15:58:51 bardo wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, i wanted to note that there is
> > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Desktop_Project maintained by bardo
> > a TU, which mentions absolutely nothing about upstream
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, i wanted to note that there is
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Desktop_Project maintained by bardo
> a TU, which mentions absolutely nothing about upstream.
> Instead it says "I (bardo) will write/modify the n
Hi, i wanted to note that there is
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Desktop_Project maintained by bardo
a TU, which mentions absolutely nothing about upstream.
Instead it says "I (bardo) will write/modify the necessary files and
notify the corresponding maintainers so they can be added to the
pa
On Thursday 08 May 2008 13:10:02 Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> Yeah, but it glibc compiling much processor time. I've made small
> shell wrapper for ldconfig and it works. Maybe the best solution would
> be adding blowfish support to glibc's libcrypt itself.
Yet another external patch for glibc? Baaah.
Yeah, but it glibc compiling much processor time. I've made small
shell wrapper for ldconfig and it works. Maybe the best solution would
be adding blowfish support to glibc's libcrypt itself.
2008/5/8 Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>
> > Thanks, so now I've to find some solut
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
Thanks, so now I've to find some solutions to this. In the worst case
I can make ldconfig wrapper.
man ldconfig :
-l Library mode. Manually link individual libraries.
Intended for use by experts only.
I don't know what does that do and how to use it but it
On Thursday 08 May 2008 05:16:15 Lin, Zihui wrote:
> Any solution?
archlinux isnt ubuntu yet. You have to read the manual and set some things up
before using it. Blame me.
I suggest starting here:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Official_Arch_Linux_Install_Guide
then
http://wiki.archlinux.org
Thanks, so now I've to find some solutions to this. In the worst case
I can make ldconfig wrapper.
2008/5/8 Alec Hussey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I had this same exact problem while either upgrading or installing a
> package(s) and I simply removed it (which I was almost sure would break
> somethin
Hello,
On Thursday 08 May 2008 06:16:15 Lin, Zihui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Arch install is graceful.After "pacman -S xorg gnome", the startx
> brought me to gnome.
>
> everygthing seem fine till I quited X by Ctrl+Alt+BackSpace, After a
> while i tried to re-startx and just had no response. No message is
--
Regards,
Agus Setiawan
http://mysetiawan.net
24 matches
Mail list logo
