Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update

2008-04-18 Thread Alec Hussey
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 08:59 +0200, JJDaNiMoTh wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:00:26 +0200 > Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Justin Gx wrote: > > > Alec Hussey wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> I was glad when you guys (or Jan de Groot, whichever) decided to push > > >> the banshee alpha o

Re: [arch-general] 2008.04-RC Images are out

2008-04-18 Thread Øyvind Heggstad
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:04:37 -0500 Simo Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Crosspostingissocool > http://www.archlinux.org/news/389/ > > Enjoy. I had some strange issues with kernel panics, oops and other fun, on my first try at installing using the 64bit ftp image. Sadly it only happened once a

Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update

2008-04-18 Thread Tobias Kieslich
Hi, to defend the basic feature set in the PKGBUILD, not every developer always uses ALL the packages he maintains. So we are not always up to snuff when it comes to the latest bells and whistles. In Banshees case, to make matters worse, changing the microversion aka the number behind the

Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update

2008-04-18 Thread gan lu
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Timm Preetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 10:19 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > > Current banshee version is 0.98.1 and latest is 0.98.3. Even though i > > dont know i doubt the features added are that essential to cause this > > fuzz. > > O

Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update

2008-04-18 Thread Timm Preetz
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 10:19 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Current banshee version is 0.98.1 and latest is 0.98.3. Even though i > dont know i doubt the features added are that essential to cause this > fuzz. Oh, they are. Banshee had a complete rewrite and the 0.98.1 version is really really

Re: [arch-general] ClamAV should be update to 0.93

2008-04-18 Thread Hussam Al-Tayeb
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 18:38 +0200, Tino Reichardt wrote: > Hello list, > > clamav should be updated. > I filed a bug with the two CVE links for the two security issues fixed by clamav 0.93 here http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10214 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message pa

Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update

2008-04-18 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On 4/18/08, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Current banshee version is 0.98.1 and latest is 0.98.3. Even though i > dont > > know i doubt the features added are that essential to cause this fuzz. > > What Xav

Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update

2008-04-18 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Current banshee version is 0.98.1 and latest is 0.98.3. Even though i dont > know i doubt the features added are that essential to cause this fuzz. > What Xavier meant to say was since you think the Archlinux package i

Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update

2008-04-18 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On 4/18/08, JJDaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:00:26 +0200 > Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Justin Gx wrote: > > > Alec Hussey wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> I was glad when you guys (or Jan de Groot, whichever) decided to push > > >> the banshee alpha out

Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update

2008-04-18 Thread JJDaNiMoTh
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:00:26 +0200 Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Justin Gx wrote: > > Alec Hussey wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I was glad when you guys (or Jan de Groot, whichever) decided to push > >> the banshee alpha out to extra. However, it is missing many pretty > >> essential features