On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Jaroslaw Swierczynski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/2/15, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > If anyone out there is doing pl or ru translations, can you let me
> > know if you need a bit more time?
>
> I'm working on the Polish one and I plan to fini
2008/2/15, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> If anyone out there is doing pl or ru translations, can you let me
> know if you need a bit more time?
I'm working on the Polish one and I plan to finish it today's evening (CET).
--
Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www.archlinux.org | www
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Hugo Doria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ping? It has been close to a week and I want to put a release together
> > this weekend. Wating on de and pt_BR translations- I think you guys
> >
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ping? It has been close to a week and I want to put a release together
> this weekend. Wating on de and pt_BR translations- I think you guys
> are in good shape besides the message changes since 3.1.1 (only 6
> message chang
Ping? It has been close to a week and I want to put a release together
this weekend. Wating on de and pt_BR translations- I think you guys
are in good shape besides the message changes since 3.1.1 (only 6
message changes since then), so this shouldn't be too hard to get
together and submit before r
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2008 23:08:02 schrieb David Rosenstrauch:
Anyone know what's up with the
ftp://mirrors.unixheads.org/archlinux/$repo/os/i686 mirror?
Just for reference: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9561
Thanks!
Anyone know why they're out of sync, BTW?
D
Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2008 23:08:02 schrieb David Rosenstrauch:
> Anyone know what's up with the
> ftp://mirrors.unixheads.org/archlinux/$repo/os/i686 mirror? It appears
> to be out of sync on at least one key package: the kernel!
>
> The devs released 2.6.24.1 on 2/10, but the mirror still
Anyone know what's up with the
ftp://mirrors.unixheads.org/archlinux/$repo/os/i686 mirror? It appears
to be out of sync on at least one key package: the kernel!
The devs released 2.6.24.1 on 2/10, but the mirror still has 2.6.23.14.
Anyone know what's going on with it? (And/or who to contac
On Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2008 21:15 Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> It happened to me too (which means I even did test it correctly, yay! :-P)
> so I'll take a closer look, but cannot promise anything as I don't
> have much idea where to look exactly.
I wants again to thank you for your work and good l
2008/1/30, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/1/30, Petar Bogdanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a reason, why /etc/issue is not in the backup array of
> > core/base/filesystem/PKGBUILD?
> >
>
>
> On developers' opinion this file is not something that is supposed to
2008/2/14, Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 23:15 Roman Kyrylych wrote:
>
> > Just wanted to inform users who don't keep an eye on a bugtracker,
> > that I've patched rlocate to work with 2.6.24 kernel
>
>
> At first i want to thanks for your your work.
>
>
> > So now:
2008/2/14, Petar Bogdanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> during the past few weeks there were xserver and firefox updates and it
> seems that they have made firefox render some monospace-fonts slightly
> bigger.
>
> The following image displays a part of a board which has not been
> modified
I have removed the Opera devel snapshots from our testing repo
to not mix it with future 9.2x releases.
You find the latest 9.5x snapshots now in unstable for both arches.
Take care - it replaces the stable Opera from extra. So backup all your
stuff before you try it out.
-AndyRTR
On Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 23:15 Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> Just wanted to inform users who don't keep an eye on a bugtracker,
> that I've patched rlocate to work with 2.6.24 kernel
At first i want to thanks for your your work.
> So now:
> * configure doesn't fail due to capabilities not being m
Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
BTW:
I don't have a clue about the font-family used in the example
since xfontsel is still a total mystery to me. However, I do
know that `monospace' is just something like an alias and not a
real font.
DejaVu Sans Mono
Hi,
during the past few weeks there were xserver and firefox updates and it
seems that they have made firefox render some monospace-fonts slightly
bigger.
The following image displays a part of a board which has not been
modified for years:
Mirror 1: http://i30.tinypic.com/vg6e0h.png
16 matches
Mail list logo
